Re: There are two sorts of auto-generated files

2021-07-21 Thread Stefan Klinger
Hello Mikolaj! Mikolaj Konarski (2021-Jul-20, excerpt): > > ...so the plan would be to raise an issue > Yes, please. Done. https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/7488 Thanks for the encouragement, let's hope for the best! Kind regards Stefan -- Stefan Klinger, Ph.D. -- computer

Re: There are two sorts of auto-generated files

2021-07-20 Thread Mikolaj Konarski
Hi, > > That's unfortunate, but why not use the normal workflow, > > that is, `cabal build`, possibly with `cabal list-bin`? > > H, I'm sorry, I don't understand what you refer to. There might > be a normal workflow that I'm not aware of. Are you hinting at not > using `cabal install` at

Re: There are two sorts of auto-generated files

2021-07-19 Thread Stefan Klinger
Hello Mikolaj, thanks for getting back to me so quickly. Mikolaj Konarski (2021-Jul-19, excerpt): > https://github.com/acfoltzer/gitrev/issues/23 > > That's unfortunate, but why not use the normal workflow, > that is, `cabal build`, possibly with `cabal list-bin`? H, I'm sorry, I don't

Re: There are two sorts of auto-generated files

2021-07-19 Thread Mikolaj Konarski
> Hi, Hi Stefan, > I, too, ran into the requirement to have a compiled Haskell binary > print the Git hash it was derived from. There's a package for that > (gitrev), which does not work to my satisfaction. I can see the problem is with `cabal v2-install` breaking gitrev.