Sliv: Do you know where I can find information on the Cookbook
development? Things like project info, source, openings, tickets or
similar info. I can't say for sure how helpful I could be. My skill-
level varies greatly with the topic but I would like to have a look to
see if I find anything I
Have a look at the CakePHP Tickets: How To Help page in the pages
section for this group. There are links to view ticket reports on the
trac site. I would include direct links in this post, but I really
want to encourage folks to check out that page. One of the available
reports is for
Thanks, I must have not looked hard enough in trac. I had not noticed
there were milestones for the Cookbook.
Hope I can be of help.
On May 14, 1:26 pm, Sliv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a look at the CakePHP Tickets: How To Help page in the pages
section for this group. There are links to
There is only really one main thing I would like to see changed about
the cookbook. That is the way proposals are forever hidden from me
after I initially post them. Being abel to not only add, but edit and
update a section not yet approved would make it easier for us
outsiders to contribute. At
There is only really one main thing I would like to see changed about
the cookbook. That is the way proposals are forever hidden from me
/Martin
Like Nate said, this is all doable, it's just about finding available
time + available ability in the same person to do it. If you think
that's
Also, I'd say that even though the Cookbook has its limitations,
documentation has made an amazing progress (and I really do mean
amazing in the most extreme sense of the word) and is still a work in
progress.
So..it's hardly necessary to change anything at this point, isn't it?
My 2p.
On May
Sorry, I wasn't aware that this was up for public discussion
because usually we leave these sorts of decisions to people who are
actually, you know, doing the work.
That's why I gave a proposal, not a demand. And I'd be happy to set up
a MediaWiki installation for you and do all the
Aaron, the brashness wasn't in the proposal itself, but in the tone in
which it was presented. Also in the fact that you already presented
the idea once, and it was rejected unanimously. Add to that the fact
that discussions of a wiki, in all it's forms and facets, has already
played out
On May 12, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Aaron Shafovaloff wrote:
I propose that the Cake team use MediaWiki with the FlaggedRevs
extension (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FlaggedRevs)
instead of their homegrown wiki, which currently has a closed review
process. This extension, which will be
Instead of spending so much time in trying to tell everyone what's
supposedly wrong with the Cookbook, why not use that time to help with the
*ACTUAL* documentation?
God forbid we all chip in on what is actually good for the community.
-MI
I can assure you that the tone wasn't sneering or cocky, it was a
sincere, constructive proposal. If you don't like my idea, then shoot
it down. No hard feelings.
To me, FlaggedRevs seems to make using a wiki all the more attractive.
I have suggested abandoning the progressive chapter-breakdown
I propose that the Cake team use MediaWiki with the FlaggedRevs
extension (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FlaggedRevs)
instead of their homegrown wiki, which currently has a closed review
process. This extension, which will be integrated into Wikipedia in
the coming months, allows for
I am personally a fan of MediaWiki, I am also a fan of the CakePHP
team and the hard work they do, either way I think both methods have
attractors and detractors.
I personally think that your ideas are valid, I too will be interested
in seeing what others have to say.
- People could engage in
:48:19 PM
Subject: Re: Cookbook overhaul proposal
I am personally a fan of MediaWiki, I am also a fan of the CakePHP
team and the hard work they do, either way I think both methods have
attractors and detractors.
I personally think that your ideas are valid, I too will be interested
in seeing what
Thoughts?
Here is one It makes CakePHP team eat their own dogfood ;)
Sam D
--
--
(the old fart) the advice is free, the lack of crankiness will cost you
- its a fine line between a real question and an idiot
http://blog.samdevore.com/archives/2007/03/05/when-open-source-bugs-me/
, and read it offline. I find
the Cake website feeds out pages from the manual very slowly.
- Original Message
From: Esoteric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CakePHP cake-php@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:48:19 PM
Subject: Re: Cookbook overhaul proposal
I am personally a fan
On May 12, 1:15 pm, Aaron Shafovaloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose that the Cake team use MediaWiki with the FlaggedRevs
extension (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FlaggedRevs)
instead of their homegrown wiki, which currently has a closed review
process.
Sorry, I wasn't aware
17 matches
Mail list logo
