On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 07:22:28AM +0100, yoann padioleau wrote:
Qemu is written in C, because I guess indeed C struct and union
and bitfields makes it easy to match directly to the hardware (no marshalling,
there is direct mapping).
I was hacking on qemu last week, and wishing it wasn't
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:06:34AM +, Jon Harrop wrote:
Indeed. Which raises the question of how I should put an OCaml front
end onto HLVM...
Use the output of camlp4 (the AST). It's reasonably well documented
in the camlp4 wiki.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones
Red Hat
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Richard Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 07:22:28AM +0100, yoann padioleau wrote:
Qemu is written in C, because I guess indeed C struct and union
and bitfields makes it easy to match directly to the hardware (no
marshalling,
there is direct mapping).
I was
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Richard Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:34:54PM +0300, malc wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Richard Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 07:22:28AM +0100, yoann padioleau wrote:
Qemu is written in C, because I guess indeed C struct and union
and bitfields
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:49:01PM +0300, malc wrote:
You lost me here.
Look at the patch I linked to [1].
- (Possibly) handling 32 and 64 bit quantities.
Not possibly, definitely (in case of better being applied to current
implementation of OCaml)
I'm not sure I mentioned OCaml, just a
Brian Hurt wrote:
[...]
Here are two real problems I've hit with type classes, in only a
few weeks banging around in Haskell.
For example, you can't have more than one instance of a type class
for any given type. So let's say you want to have a type class for
things that can be
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Richard Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:49:01PM +0300, malc wrote:
You lost me here.
Look at the patch I linked to [1].
- (Possibly) handling 32 and 64 bit quantities.
Not possibly, definitely (in case of better being applied to current
implementation
I would like to compile trading systems written in a pascal-like
programming language to OCaml AST at runtime, convert it to machine
code and use it from the same running
OCaml program (natdynlink?).
Is it possible to do this without having gcc installed?
The code I'm generating will need
Does it actually work?
./configure -cc gcc -m64
./build/fastworld.sh
...
boot/ocamlrun ./ocamlopt -nostdlib -c -nopervasives -I stdlib -o
stdlib/pervasives.cmx stdlib/pervasives.ml
/var/folders/pc/pcNEaYn32RW2i++8ZQvErU+++TM/-Tmp-/camlasmce9dc3.s:
602:junk `...@plt' after expression
...
I looked at the Camlp4 filter wiki [1] but still can't figure this out.
+ ocamlfind ocamlc -package 'oUnit, dyp, extlib' -c -I +camlp4 -g -w a
-pp 'camlp4of -I src -filter map' -I src -o src/easy_type_check.cmo
src/easy_type_check.ml
File src/easy_type_check.ml, line 45, characters 10-15:
Excerpts from Joel Reymont's message of Thu Mar 05 16:04:09 +0100 2009:
I looked at the Camlp4 filter wiki [1] but still can't figure this out.
+ ocamlfind ocamlc -package 'oUnit, dyp, extlib' -c -I +camlp4 -g -w a
-pp 'camlp4of -I src -filter map' -I src -o src/easy_type_check.cmo
Of course, you can always say that you can use the foreign function
interface, but then you lose inlining and speed.
The same is true of C/C++. You can get much better performance from
assembler
but calling assembler from C or C++ not only costs inlining and
speed but
even functionality
On 05-03-2009, Joel Reymont joe...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to compile trading systems written in a pascal-like
programming language to OCaml AST at runtime, convert it to machine
code and use it from the same running
OCaml program (natdynlink?).
Is it possible to do this without
I don't think that it compiles the way it is now. It seems to me that
there was a version merge error and asmcomp/amd64/emit.mlp has
repeated definitions of emit_call and emit_jump.
Andres
On Mar 5, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Joel Reymont wrote:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 3:10 PM, David Allsopp wrote:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
Why not using the LLVM OCaml binding? It is directly shipped with
LLVM.
So you can write the entire generator in OCaml...
I would love to use LLVM. My concern is the overhead of calling from
LLVM into OCaml, though. The code I'll be
On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:08 PM, Andres Varon wrote:
I don't think that it compiles the way it is now. It seems to me
that there was a version merge error and asmcomp/amd64/emit.mlp has
repeated definitions of emit_call and emit_jump.
I wonder if the OCaml team will move to git at some point
This is the sort of thing that OCaml-bitstring might be adapted to do.
ditto lisp bit vectors? still, seems sorta not close enough.
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives:
I just did a fresh install and it is working fine for me when I use the
normal method. The ocamlbuild method seems to compile fine, but make install
gives some error. I checked ocamlbuild's log file and the last line says
Compilation successful, but when I do make install it says cp: ocamlc: No
Ashish,
I'm not getting the previous error anymore and my issue is the same as
yours now.
Reason?
SANITIZE: a total of 749 files that should probably not be in your
source
tree has been found. A script shell file _build/sanitize.sh is
being
created. Check this script and run it to
Joel Reymont joe...@gmail.com writes:
I have a cma that I built and I'm trying to interactively test some
functions.
ocaml seems to require me to individually #load cmo-s, including
dependencies.
Is there a way to load all modules of a cma in one fell swoop?
Do I resign to creating
On Mar 5, 2009, at 6:58 PM, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
Joel Reymont joe...@gmail.com writes:
ocaml seems to require me to individually #load cmo-s, including
dependencies.
I'm sorry for the noise.
The cma was missing the required cmos.
Foot in mouth!
---
http://tinyco.de
Mac, C++, OCaml
On Thursday 05 March 2009 06:22:28 yoann padioleau wrote:
Come on, can you stop all those stuff about LLVM. The guy works in a game
company with people knowing C/C++ for decades, with quite a lot of legacy
code I guess, and you arrive with your hey you should use LLVM that
almost nobody knows
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote:
Is this [the lambda IL] format documented anywhere?
The ocamljs backend compiles Javascript from the lambda intermediate
language. I haven't found documentation of it, but most of it is
pretty easy to understand (a few
On Thursday 05 March 2009 20:50:58 Jake Donham wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote:
Is this [the lambda IL] format documented anywhere?
The ocamljs backend compiles Javascript from the lambda intermediate
language. I haven't found documentation of
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:10:18PM -0800, Pal-Kristian Engstad wrote:
During the PlayStation 2 era, Naughty Dog used its own proprietary
language called Goal - an imperative variant of Scheme.
I thought I'd heard of you guys before ...
http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20020710/white_01.htm
25 matches
Mail list logo
