zaid Khalid wrote:
Hi Folks
I want some help in writing regular expressions in Ocaml, as I know how to
write it
in informal way but in Ocaml syntax I can not. For example I want to write
a* | (aba)* .
This question would better be posted on the beginners' list -
Thanassis Tsiodras wrote:
I apologize beforehand if this is not the forum to ask.
I am on the fence about whether to learn OCaml or not, and while reading
an article called Why OCaml
(http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Software/Ocaml/why_ocaml.html), I saw that
OCaml was praised for the speed of
Isaac Gouy wrote:
David Allsopp dra-news at metastack.com writes:
-snip-
Reducing an entire programming language's strengths (or
weaknesses!) to a single number is just not really realistic - the
truth is more complex than one single-precision floating point
number (or even an array
Isaac Gouy wrote:
Ed Keith e_d_k at yahoo.com writes:
I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a JUSTIFICATION
for them (which you
have been incapable of providing so far).
I feel no need to provide a JUSTIFICATION to you for anything.
Am I to interpret this to mean that
Edgar Friendly wrote:
It looks like high-performance computing of the near future will be built
out of many machines (message passing), each with many cores (SMP). One
could use message passing for all communication in such a system, but a
hybrid approach might be best for this architecture,
Emmanuel Dieul wrote:
Hi everyone.
I've just noticed a type inference problem (or am I wrong ?). Here's my
example :
let format_date =
let format_valeur = function valeur -
(if valeur 10 then 0 else ) ^ (string_of_int valeur)
Your main problem has already been answered but it's
Oliver Bandel wrote:
Hello,
I want to refresh my OCaml knowledge after I (again) paused for a while.
I want to know, when certain parts of the code are executed,
for example if I have more than one let _ = ...
statement in my code (for example in different comp0ilaion units each one
of
Jean Krivine wrote:
Dear ocaml users,
A simple question: is it safe to marshalize a data structure that contains
imperative elements (like arrays or hashtbl) ?
Simple answer: yes. Marshal works on the runtime representation of data which
is imperative (immutability is enforced by the type
Paul Steckler wrote:
In Windows, NTFS filenames are specified in Unicode (UTF-16). Am I right
in thinking that OCaml file primitives, like open_in, readdir, etc. cannot
handle NTFS filenames containing characters with codepoints greater than
255?
Given that the WinAPI wide functions use
Paul Steckler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:23 PM, David Allsopp dra-n...@metastack.com
wrote:
A way (but not foolproof on Windows 7 and Windows 2008 R2 because you
can disable it) would be to wrap the GetShortPathName Windows API
function[1] which will convert the pathname to its DOS
Hi,
why does camlp4 parse quotations inside comments? Eg
I don't know for certain, but I guess it might be for the same reason as the
compiler which checks string literals (amongst other things) inside comments
e.g.
(* This will not compile *)
File foo.ml, line 1, characters 0-2:
Error:
Adrien wrote:
Hi,
snip
Also, on my computer, I have the following behaviour:
11:44 ~ % sudo echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
zsh: permission denied: /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
r...@jarjar:~# echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
r...@jarjar:~#
I
Oliver Bandel wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:01:24PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:42:40AM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le jeudi 8 juillet 2010 06:44:34, Richard Jones a écrit :
Stdlib could bind the uname(2) syscall, but it's legendary in its
complexity.
Martin DeMello wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net
wrote:
The authors of C-- have implemented a Lua engine in OCaml, with a
good, high-level, type-safe interface for embedding it. Look for 'lua-
ml'.
There is also an OCaml implementation of Scheme
bluestorm wrote:
Here is a small Camlp4 filter removing exhaustive patterns. It obviously
depends on 3.12.
snip
Notes :
- that the OCaml printer expand sugared { a; b } patters into { a = a; b = b
} is necessary
for printing backward-compatible code; I'm not sure it's a good idea to
k/Paul Steckler wrote:
I've written a wee Web server in OCaml that's compiled using the ocamlopt
from the Fedora MinGW distribution of ocaml. I'm running the server in
Windows 7.
Sometimes after receiving several requests, the Unix.send call that sends
a response back to a Web client just
W Dan Meyer wrote:
bluestorm bluestorm.d...@gmail.com writes:
Beware that %identity is an unsafe feature that breaks all safety
guarantees if used badly.
Yes %identity is another solution. Although as safe as Obj.magic.
It's a bit pedantic but the %identity *primitive* is not the evil
Gabriel Scherer wrote:
Incidentally, the general function for getting a unique integer for a
variant type with non-constant constructors isn't that bad either:
let int_of_gen x =
let x = Obj.repr x
in
if Obj.is_block x
then -1 * Obj.tag x - 1
else (Obj.magic x : int)
I consider
Luc Maranget wrote:
Of course, if you have the following:
type t = A | B | C
let int_of_t = function
A - 0
| B - 1
| C - 2
Then in fact I believe that the compiler already converts that to a
hashtable lookup instead of a sequence of jumps..
The compiler does not convert the
Luc Maranget wrote:
Luc Maranget wrote:
Of course, if you have the following:
type t = A | B | C
let int_of_t = function
A - 0
| B - 1
| C - 2
Then in fact I believe that the compiler already converts that to
a hashtable lookup instead of a sequence of
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
snip
However if the exception is, say, an I/O error reading a disk file,
these should be thrown, and caught somewhere central where you can
display an error message to the user (for GUI programs) or abort the
current transaction (for server programs).
Matthieu Dubuget wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile ocaml (mingw) on XP.
I did not succeed, and could reproduce the very same behaviour on two
computers (a real one, and in a virtual machine).
On my main development system, the compilation does not fail. The
difference may be that I
Florent Ouchet wrote:
Same here, specially to avoid the Not_found exception.
The optional return values gives the oportunity to have a clear view of
what is being done if the result is not available.
Agreed - though [find] is one of the examples where you do need find and
find_exc - because
Daniel Bünzli wrote:
Agreed - though [find] is one of the examples where you do need find
and find_exc - because often there are occasions where before calling
{Map,Set,Hashtbl}.find you already know that the key exists and so
won't fail at which point the 'a option boxing is a waste of
Mark Shinwell wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:54:29AM +0100, David Allsopp wrote:
Florent Ouchet wrote:
Same here, specially to avoid the Not_found exception.
The optional return values gives the oportunity to have a clear view
of what is being done if the result is not available
Michael Grünewald wrote:
Dear Jeff,
Jeff Shaw wrote:
Dear OCamlers,
I spent quite a lot of time today getting better acquainted with GNU
make and decided I to share my experience and results. It's a bit on
the newbie friendly side of instruction.
Eray Ozkural wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net
wrote:
Yes, Python's hash tables are particularly optimized due to their wide
pervasive usage. When you're testing Python hash tables, you're
really testing a carefully-written, thoroughly-tuned C
Oliver Bandel wrote:
Zitat von Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:27:47PM +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote:
is it planned, to also include SHA1-Hash into stdlib?
I don't know about stdlib, but the ocaml-sha library
(http://tab.snarc.org/projects/ocaml_sha/) provides Sha1
Alain Frisch wrote:
On 3/17/2010 6:42 PM, David Allsopp wrote:
AFAIK local modules is a syntax extension not a compiler extension - I
expect (not looked at it) that the syntax extension simply alpha
renames all the local module declarations to make them unique and puts
them globally
Dario Teixeira wrote:
Hi,
AFAIK local modules is a syntax extension not a compiler extension - I
expect (not looked at it) that the syntax extension simply alpha
renames all the local module declarations to make them unique and puts
them globally... a very useful extension but no
Dario Teixeira wrote:
I've come across a problem which though novel to me, I presume must be
familiar to those with more ML baggage. Namely, I need a module whose
values are not known at the initialisation stage, since they can only be
determined after reading a configuration file. If this
Michael Hicks wrote:
I've just been playing with using camelia on Windows, since some
students in my class are using it.
My problem is that I can't figure out how to configure Camelia to run a
non-Cygwin Ocaml. My installation puts the executables in C:\Program
Files\Objective Caml\bin,
Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
Guillaume Yziquel a écrit :
# type untyped;;
type untyped
# type 'a typed = private untyped;;
type 'a typed = private untyped
# type -'typing tau = private obj
and 'a t = 'a typed tau
and obj = private untyped tau;;
type 'a
Marco Maggi wrote:
Ciao,
I am a True Beginner taking a look at O'Caml; I hope not to be
abusing by posting here rather than the beginners list.
Building OCaml from source is definitely not a beginners' question! :o)
I think I successfully compiled ocaml-3.11.2 on my
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
David Allsopp dra-n...@metastack.com writes:
external foo_of_bar : bar - foo = %identity
in *both* the .ml and .mli file for the module in question. I'm
virtually certain that ocamlopt eliminates calls to the %identity
primitive.
Where is that documented
Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
David Allsopp a écrit :
snip
external foo_of_bar : bar - foo = %identity
in *both* the .ml and .mli file for the module in question. I'm
virtually certain that ocamlopt eliminates calls to the %identity
primitive.
yziq...@seldon:~$ grep magic /usr/lib/ocaml
matter once it's fixed in 3.12.0 (as you
say).
Martin DeMello wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:44 PM, David Allsopp dra-n...@metastack.com
wrote:
My shiny new Nokia N900 has finally arrived so, of course, having got
bash, vim and texlive successfully installed I naturally need a
compiler
My shiny new Nokia N900 has finally arrived so, of course, having got bash,
vim and texlive successfully installed I naturally need a compiler!
Before I dig into trying to compile OCaml on Maemo 5, can I ask if anyone
else out there has already tried (and hopefully succeeded)?
David
Romain Beauxis:
I have a problem with the following code under win32:
let m = Mutex.create ()
let () =
Mutex.lock m;
if Mutex.try_lock m then
Printf.printf locked !\n
else
Printf.printf could not lock!\n
This code is behaving correctly for a Windows mutex (AFAIK - I
Tom Wilkie wrote:
Dear all
Is Queue.fold going over items in the wrong order? It says equivalent
to List.fold_left but I would expect the behaviour to be, when
inserting items 1, then 2, then 3 a fold would be given items in that
order?
Is there a good reason for this? Could be have a
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
David Allsopp dra-n...@metastack.com writes:
Matej Kosik wrote:
I am sorry, I have a stupid question.
I would like to ask if this:
# 2147483648l 2147483647l;;
- : bool = true
The bug is in fact:
# 2147483648l;;
- : int32 = -2147483648l
Michel Levy wrote:
I have byte-code produced by ocamlc version 3.11.1 which does not work
with ocamlrun version 3.09.3.
Is this situation normal ?
Afraid so.
Must I have exactly the same version for the compiler producing the
byte-code and the ocamlrun executing this code ?
Yes - even
Guillaume Yziquel:
Basile STARYNKEVITCH a écrit :
Why do these functions not follow the usual CAMLparam/CAMLreturn
macro stuff?
Because they are written by the Ocaml guys (Damien knows really well
the Ocaml garbage collector; he wrote it). And also, because these
particular
Matej Kosik wrote:
I am sorry, I have a stupid question.
I would like to ask if this:
# 2147483648l 2147483647l;;
- : bool = true
The bug is in fact:
# 2147483648l;;
- : int32 = -2147483648l
and given that behaviour, the above result makes sense! But...
it cannot be encoded
Damien Doligez wrote:
It is our pleasure to announce that the release of 3.11.2 is imminent.
What we need now is your cooperation for testing the release candidate,
especially on Windows.
I've managed to compile this RC on Windows 7 x64 using the MinGW 32-bit port
(with ocaml-calendar 2.02,
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Eray Ozkural wrote:
Compiling Ocaml to efficient C is not easy and probably impossible (or
extremely difficult) in the general case. In
particular, tail recursive calls are essential in Ocaml, and are not
available in C in most compilers.
What's this based on
Ashish Agarwal wrote:
If you only have a file ast.mli, you should not be able to write Ast.Sig
because you do not have a module named Ast.
This isn't true - the include statement works at a type system level
(because you're dealing with a signature) and therefore only a .cmi file is
required. It
Mykola Stryebkov wrote:
I'm trying to declare to record types with fields having the same name
but different types.
This is not possible with record types (at the same module scope) - when you
declare the second type you obscure the previous type.
snip
If I declare type ta second -
I'm creating a parser for a LaTeX-ish language that features verbatim blocks.
Out of interest, how LaTeX-ish do you mean? I would hazard a guess that it's
impossible to parse an unrestricted TeX file using an LR grammar (or at least
no more clear than a hand-coded automaton) because you have
Aaron Bohannon wrote:
I am quite confused by the whole process of compiling and installing
wrappers for C libraries. It seems like I can get things to work OK
without really knowing what I'm doing if everything is put and built
in a single directory. The hard part seems to be putting the
The problem is that a c:\windows\system32\cmd.exe windows pops up:
I'd like to avoid this.
Both Sys.command and Unix.system use cmd in order to provide command line
parsing (it gives the closest equivalent to the Unix version - except for
the usual quoting weirdness of cmd as compared to bash!)
If i find a way to read the exit status of the process…
Pass a PROCESS_INFORMATION structure to CreateProcess (in order to get the
hProcess for the process you created) and then use GetExitCodeProcess[1]. You
can use WaitForSingleObject passing hProcess to it if you need to block until
the
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
snip
Then what about
type t1 = Bar of int * int
type t2 = Foo of (int * int)
If you treat constructors as functions taking one argument then
But why (so arbitrarily) do this?
t1: int * int - t1
t2: int * int - t2
If you look at each type definition and
Le 9 oct. 09 à 16:18, Damien Guichard a écrit :
Imagine my code is:
type color = int
let black : color = 0
Then, following your proposition, evaluating black should give me
an int rather than a color because int is shorter and therefore nicer.
Hmm, I'd say that having OCaml
Is there a reason for constructors not to behave like functions? For
instance, one cannot make a partial application from a constructor:
This is how SML handles constructors, Xavier explained the reasons he chose to
depart from this in:
David Allsopp wrote:
Is there a reason for constructors not to behave like functions?
For instance, one cannot make a partial application from a constructor:
This is how SML handles constructors, Xavier explained the reasons he
chose to depart from this in:
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml
Jon Harrop wrote:
David Allsopp wrote:
I think it would be possible to simulate the SML behaviour in OCaml
using camlp4 (if you assume that for [type foo = Bar of int] that future
unbound references to [bar] are interpreted as [fun x - bar x] instead of
an
error)
Only if you turned
I tried, and it works fine until the require of json-static. It breaks
when loading pcre.cma.
Now we can say that pcre package has some problem, but dynlink is loaded
successfully.
Hmm - a few other things to check:
1. Are you definitely using Cygwin's PCRE and which version (run pcre-config
Conglun Yao wrote:
Thanks for all of your help.
Unfortunately, it still does not work. It is really nightmare to use camp4
in a windows machine.
In this instance, it's very much Cygwin that's causing the problem, rather
than Windows! I didn't realise that Cygwin's Dynlink only extended to
The problem is : most of the usefull types and functions are installed
in the toplevellib.cma but I can't use this without the proper cmi
files (I need config.cmi for cmi_magic_number, printtyp.cmi and
typemod.cmi for printing signatures, but env.cmi would be nice to have
as well for
Mykola Stryebkov wrote:
Hi, Richard.
On 23 Вер 2009, at 22:57, Richard Jones wrote:
snip
I'm going to use stringing bits of text together. But text generating
is not an issue here. The issue is how to make this stringing driven by
description of ocaml records.
camlp4 would be the
Matthieu Dubuget wrote:
Hello,
recently, I had to call a third-party DLL (Windows, mingw flavour of
OCaml).
It was not easy, because of symbol names decorations (I think).
It is indeed not easy - fortunately, it's a once-only thing (for each DLL)
I'd like to know if there is a more simple
Matthias Puech wrote:
David Allsopp a écrit :
Is it not possible to model your requirement using Map.Make instead -
where the keys represent the equivalence classes and the values whatever
data you're associating with them?
Yes, that's exactly the workaround I ended up using, although
Are you aware of such future changes in OCaml, that would lead to
incompatibility?
With the usual caveat that past performance is not an indicator of future
wealth...
In the last few years, the only change which caused a bit of an uproar was
camlp4 between 3.09 and 3.10 (which was totally
Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
09/04/2009 09:37 PM, Gaius Hammond:
I am after a language that has the rapid-development of Python or Tcl
but with type safety; OCaml is right now the best bet, but it is
*very* rough around the edges. The way you install ActivePython is you
download it and
Hi Reed,
Having hacked away with the Win64 port before I thought I’d
have a go. The first thing I noticed is that Microsoft have finally released
the x86 and x64 compilers in the same package (this was a pain if you wanted to
build MSVC and MSVC64 ports as you needed two
ri...@happyleptic.org wrote:
Oops.
The following makes it possible for f to be garbage-collected:
...?
Because the fact that the fun calls f does not count as a reference ?
The anonymous function in the second version of Martin's function doesn't
call [f] (at least directly): imagine if
Ivan Chollet wrote:
See the following snippet:
# let q = Queue.create () in
Queue.push 0 q;
q == q;;
- : bool = true
Standard behavior.
Now let see this:
# let q = Queue.create () in
Queue.push 0 q;
q = q;;
which hangs for ever...
Internally, Queues are a cyclic data
When you pass a value to a function, you create a pointer to that value in
the OCaml runtime - the GC can't collect the old value until List.iter
completes because the value is still live (internally, it's part of a local
root but, in practice, as List.iter is implemented in OCaml directly it's
Christoph Bauer wrote:
snip
I'm not quite sure what is going on, but my best bet is this: the main
loop waits for the sockets with
Unix.select listOfSockets [] [] timeout
One socket is the listener socket on which new connections
are made. Unix.select returns a list of sockets. Initially
ygrek wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:16:17 +0100
David Allsopp dra-n...@metastack.com wrote:
Now, at any time, the SCM may invoke the ServiceCtrlHandler function
registered with it. This also needs to callback to an OCaml function
to work out what to do (the closure was registered
I'm having some trouble with a library wrapping Windows Services - I'm
wondering if anyone can shed some light on possible pitfalls with the
mechanism for C callbacks while I continue to scratch my head! Although my
problem is with a Windows-based solution my overall question is about
C-callbacks
You need to say
#directory ocamlgraph;;
Before you #use your file so that the toploop can find graph.cmi
David
From: caml-list-boun...@yquem.inria.fr
[mailto:caml-list-boun...@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Ligia Nistor
Sent: 25 June 2009 18:00
To:
Has anyone had a go at building OCaml using the 64-bit beta of the MSYS
tools[1]?
David
[1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Dario Teixeira wrote:
Thanks -- that is also an interesting solution. I'm guessing it will
be faster, though it might consume more memory in cases where only one
field is actually used. I'll have to try it side-by-side with the
object based solution to see how they compare in the real world
Though it is probably been-there-done-that material for the veterans in
this list, for the sake of the not-so-veterans I have to ask: how do you guys
typically model width subtyping in Ocaml?
Definitely not a veteran, but might private types help a little?
Consider for example three record
I built OCaml 3.11.0/MinGW with findlib on Windows 7 RC a few days ago. I
found that while my Cygwin installer doesn't install its own OCaml on
Windows Vista by default, for some reason on Windows 7 it installs loads
more software in the default install!
Is Cygwin's OCaml definitely not
Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
I am volunteer to be reviewer.
However, I think it should not be a criteria to be a mother tongue
english for many reason: Non mother tongue english people use
simple english and does not understand very advanced english.
Mother tongue english are tempted to
Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
Maybe this point can be discussed. I think 3 ports for windows is a bit
too much... I don't know Dimitry point of view, but maybe INRIA can
just consider MSVC (or mingw). If this is a way to free INRIA resources,
it
is a good option.
There are actually 4 Windows ports
It's been about 5 years since I faced this situation. I'm trying to link
my program against the Thread module. Things go well until I do the ocamlopt
compilation, then it aborts the make with the message:
ocamlfind ocamlopt -thread -o sdsp.opt -package camlp4 -package threads
-package unix -I
Hi David,
David Allsopp wrote:
I've just had an enlightening few hours getting pcre-ocaml to compile
under
Windows
...
The main thing that's got me puzzled is the renaming of libpcre.dll.a
and
libpcre.a that I have to do to get the thing to link.
Thanks for investigating
Is there any way to allow modules loaded with Dynlink in the top-level to
have access to modules loaded using #load?
For example, suppose I have bar.cmo which depends on foo.cmo. If I say:
Objective Caml version 3.11.0
# #load dynlink.cma;;
# #load foo.cmo;;
# Dynlink.openfile bar.cmo;;
Alain Frisch wrote:
DESMONS Bertrand wrote:
It is really strange for me... 'ls' recognizes liblapack.a, but I
don't
see it using 'dir' ... ? There is also no liblapack.a.lnk, but isn't
that
due to the fact that liblapack.a is a symbolic link?
Try dir /a - perhaps the attributes on the
Bertrand Desmons wrote:
I followed your trick and now compilation is OK.
Excellent - good to know that the trick is consistent for other libraries
too!
Just a remark however (maybe it's the key for the porblem): when
renaming
the old 'liblapack.a', Windows asked me a confirmation, arguing
I'm trying to use json-static in the toplevel (OCaml 3.11.0 / MinGW /
findlib 1.2.4) but I'm getting an error message:
# #camlp4o;;
C:\Dev\OCaml\lib\dynlink.cma: loaded
C:\Dev\OCaml\lib\camlp4: added to search path
C:\Dev\OCaml\lib\camlp4\camlp4o.cma: loaded
Camlp4 Parsing version 3.11.0
I've just had an enlightening few hours getting pcre-ocaml to compile under
Windows (I tried a few years ago and, very lazily, just gave up). I've
managed to get it to work but I'm wondering whether anyone else has done
this and, if so, whether they can explain/confirm/correct a couple of the
On the other hand, it was pointed to me that Alain already wrote a
compiler patch implementing first-class modules.
That's right.
I have two questions - the first of which will probably demonstrate my lack of
skill with the OCaml module system.
1. Does first-class modules, as with
Jacques Garrigue wrote:
The reason is mostly wrong :-)
That'll teach me to comment on type theory on this list :o)
And neither polymorphic variants nor object require type anotations in
ocaml; they just make it much more painful to understand error
messages.
Though I'm confused by this - I
Dawid Toton wrote:
Could anybody explain why it's impossible to have type classes in OCaml?
I don't think it's impossible - but I believe that if you introduce type
classes then you damage Hindley-Milner type inference and you can no
longer derive a principal typing for an arbitrary ML
ocamlyacc - you can get most of it for free out of parsing/parser.mly in the
OCaml sources... the section on type expressions starts at line 1144 for OCaml
3.11.0.
David
-Original Message-
From: caml-list-boun...@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-
boun...@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf
Jun Furuse wrote:
snip
Sorry, but I do not think so:
include List
let g = length
ocamlc 3.11.0 with -annot never informs about length, included from
List. This is why a compiler patch is required at least for version
3.11.0.
This is a bug and should be reported in Mantis -
C:\head -10 c:\vim\vim72\indent\ocaml.vim
Vim indent file
Language: OCaml
Maintainers: Jean-Francois Yuen jfy...@happycoders.org
Mike Leary le...@nwlink.com
Markus Mottl markus.mo...@gmail.com
URL:
I’m seeing the same thing...
David
From: caml-list-boun...@yquem.inria.fr
[mailto:caml-list-boun...@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Reed Wilson
Sent: 17 December 2008 06:53
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Freeze in 64-bit Windows Num module
Hi guys,
I have an
See Section 18.3.4 of the manual. In your example below, Null is an integer
0 and Int is a 1-word block with tag 1. In C, Null is Val_int(0) and t =
Int(x) is caml_alloc(1, 1); Store_field(t, 0, Val_int(x)).
In general, the first constructor is 0 and so on in the order specified in
the type
On 22 November 2008 01:20 Jon Harrop wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2008 23:45:34 Dario Teixeira wrote:
Hi,
Does ocamlfind support any of this? Since I'm now also
cross-compiling OCaml, I've certainly come to appreciate
findlib more than ever.
Indeed it does. The current version
On 20 November 2008 10:49, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:33:03AM +, Richard Jones wrote:
Encouraging developers to open modules is also usually a bad idea,
except in very limited circumstances (hello Printf).
Why? You and others failed me to convince of this. Or,
Edgar Friendly wrote:
Jacques Garrigue wrote:
Your intuition is correct that it would theoretically be possible to
try subtyping in place of unification in some cases. The trouble is
that thoses cases are not easy to specify (so that it would be hard
for the programmer to known when he
Edgar Friendly wrote:
David Allsopp wrote:
Without the full coercion for x you'll get a type error because the type
checker infers that the type of the [if] expression is [t] from the
[then] branch and then fails to unify [ `B of int ] with [t] unless the
type of [x] is first coerced
Daniel Bünzli wrote:
Le 30 oct. 08 à 21:18, David Allsopp a écrit :
Shouldn't I now be able to say:
string_of_int x;;
I don't think so. According to the manual [1] the only thing you can
do on private types is pattern match or project their fields. I
doesn't mean your type can
Andrew Varon wrote:
On Oct 17, 2008, at 5:59 AM, David Allsopp wrote:
Pleased to say that I've got my 3 current projects compiled and
running
under 3.11+beta1
Unfortunately for one of the projects, its reference run (a
computationally intensive, repeatable operation the speed
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
