I'd be willing to give that a try, though a mephisto account per
author feels a bit top-heavy for the community-driven documentation
effort I had in mind. Maybe that's what we try first, though. What
would it take to set that up?
A domain name pointed to the same IP that
It might be worth banging this around here for a week or two and
see if we can come up with something that is better than a wiki.
Is there any particular reason why it can't be done in 'rdoc' in the
code
base. At least then we can submit patches to it (assuming there is
somewhere capistrano
The problem with rdoc is it is API-oriented. I'm wanting something
that someone new to capistrano could pick up and learn how to use
capistrano with. I've not seen an rdoc-generated site that succeeded
from that perspective.
- Jamis
On Jan 12, 2007, at 9:11 AM, NeilW wrote:
It might be
On 12 Jan 2007, at 16:11, NeilW wrote:
It might be worth banging this around here for a week or two and
see if we can come up with something that is better than a wiki.
Is there any particular reason why it can't be done in 'rdoc' in the
code
base. At least then we can submit patches to
I've not seen an rdoc-generated site that succeeded from that
perspective.
+1. Most RDoc-generated sites are good at convincing visitors that their
efforts at understanding are doomed to failure.
Ultimately, I'd like to be able to provide a printable version of the
docs, as well as a version
Well, look at this :
http://deplate.sourceforge.net/index.php
An it's Ruby-based by the way !
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano
On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:11 AM, NeilW wrote:
It might be worth banging this around here for a week or two and
see if we can come up with something that is better than a wiki.
one alternative might be to set up a documentation repository and
handle changes via the standard submit patch - we
On Jan 12, 2007, at 12:28 PM, philippe lachaise wrote:
+1. Most RDoc-generated sites are good at convincing visitors that
their efforts at understanding are doomed to failure.
+1. my initial experiences with rails were pretty painful, as i got
a giant list of the api and no small nugget
On 1/12/07, Faisal N Jawdat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 12:28 PM, philippe lachaise wrote:
+1. Most RDoc-generated sites are good at convincing visitors that
their efforts at understanding are doomed to failure.
+1. my initial experiences with rails were pretty painful,
On Jan 12, 2007, at 2:24 PM, Rick Olson wrote:
On 1/12/07, Faisal N Jawdat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 12:28 PM, philippe lachaise wrote:
+1. Most RDoc-generated sites are good at convincing visitors that
their efforts at understanding are doomed to failure.
+1. my
10 matches
Mail list logo
