Hi Michael,
Glad you got that working.
I created the soak-test branch a couple of months ago when I merged various
repositories into casper-astro and attempted to make some new fixes to the
qdr. Since its creation, I and a few others have been using the branch. At
this point I think it's ready to be merged into master.
I'll probably do that next week sometime, unless there are objections...
Thanks,
Jack

On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 2:09 pm Michael D'Cruze <
michael.dcr...@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi Jack, Primiani,
>
>
>
> That seems to have worked – thanks.
>
>
>
> Is this particular branch a beta-test version for fixes before they become
> mainstream?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> *From:* Jack Hickish [mailto:jackhick...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 13 August 2015 19:06
> *To:* Michael D'Cruze; casper@lists.berkeley.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [casper] 5GS/s ADC compile errors
>
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>
> This is fixed by commit 404989f. It's in the casper-astro-soak-test branch
> of https://github.com/casper-astro/mlib_devel
> There's a bunch of other fixes in this branch, so I would suggest using
> it. At some point in the hopefully near future it will become the standard
> casper-astro master branch.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Jack
>
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 10:50 Michael D'Cruze <
> michael.dcr...@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I’m getting an error on compiling a spectrometer design which I’m having
> trouble understanding. The following appears in the command line interface:
>
>
>
> ERROR:PhysDesignRules:2506 - Incorrect placement for a BUFR component.
> BUFR
>
> mdl_bbox_quant_asiaa_adc5g/mdl_bbox_quant_asiaa_adc5g/DIVBUF in clock
> region CLOCKREGION_X0Y7 is driven by a CCIO
>
> adc0clk_p in clock region CLOCKREGION_X0Y5. The BUFR should be placed in
> the same clock region as the CCIO or the
>
> CLOCK_DEDICATED_ROUTE constraint should be used on the net
>
> <mdl_bbox_quant_asiaa_adc5g/mdl_bbox_quant_asiaa_adc5g/adc_clk>.
>
> ERROR:Pack:1642 - Errors in physical DRC.
>
>
>
> It reads to me as if there’s something wrong with the ADC block
> internally, but as I’ve got a very recent commit I can’t see how that could
> be, especially given the number of people using this block…
>
>
>
> For completeness, I’m using a 2048 MHz ADC clock in single channel mode
> (for 2048 MHz input bandwidth) and have set the fabric clock to 4096/16=256
> MHz running off the ADC clock. The actual ADC is in ZDOK0.
>
>
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated; I can only see one error similar to
> this on the mail archive and it seemed to have been fixed in a subsequent
> mlib_devel commit.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Michael
>

Reply via email to