A quick time-to-production could be achieved through distributing
re-packaged client libraries. I like that idea. I brought it up on
IRC at one time, and Jonathan convinced me I was wrong, but now I
can't remember why and I like the idea again.
Also, as Jonathan notes, there *is* a Thrift HTTP
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Michael Greenemichael.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick time-to-production could be achieved through distributing
re-packaged client libraries. I like that idea. I brought it up on
IRC at one time, and Jonathan convinced me I was wrong, but now I
can't remember
Does the Thrift JSON stuff still require you to generate client bindings?
Evan
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Michael
Greenemichael.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick time-to-production could be achieved through distributing
re-packaged client libraries. I like that idea. I brought it up on
Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC my objection there was that for things like thrift/py that assume
part of thrift is installed normally in python site-packages you
can't just give someone a self-contained client module w/o some pretty
gross hacks.
I was assuming one would use the
