I've moved the already-committed-as-0.9 issues to 0.6, and created a
new 0.7 version for tickets that do not fit the goal of a quick
release fully compatible with 0.5.
-Jonathan
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
In the month since 0.5 was branched, we've
There have been a few changes[1] in the 0.5 branch since RC3. In a perfect
world, we'd probably push those into another release candidate, but I
feel pretty good about this one, and any remaining issues can always
be added to 0.5.1.
I propose the following tag and artifacts for 0.5.0:
SVN Tag:
+1
On Jan 18, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
There have been a few changes[1] in the 0.5 branch since RC3. In a perfect
world, we'd probably push those into another release candidate, but I
feel pretty good about this one, and any remaining issues can always
be added to 0.5.1.
I
+1
On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:54 AM, Chris Goffinet wrote:
+1
On Jan 18, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
There have been a few changes[1] in the 0.5 branch since RC3. In a perfect
world, we'd probably push those into another release candidate, but I
feel pretty good about this one, and
+1
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 14:28, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
I propose the following tag and artifacts for 0.5.0:
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.5.0
0.5.0 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
+1
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Gary Dusbabek gdusba...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 14:28, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
I propose the following tag and artifacts for 0.5.0:
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.5.0
+1
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
There have been a few changes[1] in the 0.5 branch since RC3. In a perfect
world, we'd probably push those into another release candidate, but I
feel pretty good about this one, and any remaining issues can always
be
+1
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Jaakko rosvopaalli...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
There have been a few changes[1] in the 0.5 branch since RC3. In a
perfect
world, we'd probably push those into another release
Any chance of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-713 getting
looked at and closed before a 0.5.0 final?
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Pablo A. Delgado pabl...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Jaakko rosvopaalli...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Jan
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
There have been a few changes[1] in the 0.5 branch since RC3. In a perfect
world, we'd probably push those into another release candidate, but I
feel pretty good about this one, and any remaining issues can always
be
+1 for Jonathan, Thanks for your hard work, Jonathan.
-Santal
2010/1/6 Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com
When we graduate, we need to have someone who will act as the Chair of
the Project Management Committee, or Chair. The Chair reports to the
ASF Board on behalf of the project, maintains
+1
Jun
IBM Almaden Research Center
K55/B1, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099
jun...@almaden.ibm.com
|
| From: |
|
No, but we will definitely take a look at it for 0.5.1.
0.5.0 will not be perfect but it is a huge improvement over 0.4.2,
which people are still using because that's the official stable
release. We need to fix that. :)
-Jonathan
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Ryan Daum r...@thimbleware.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
