Good news! Yesterday (for those who aren't on private), the board
approved the resolution to adopt Cassandra as a top level project,
you've graduated!
Now your last incubator read should be the graduation guide, it
explains how to get the TLP infra set up. In short the mailing-lists
and the repo
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
There have been a few changes[1] in the 0.5 branch since RC3. In a perfect
world, we'd probably push those into another release candidate, but I
feel pretty good about this one, and any remaining issues can always
be
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.5.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
Since beta1 there have been known bugs fixed, new bugs discovered, and
then fixed, optimizations made, and some nifty new enhancements (see
CHANGES.txt[1]). Also, the for-0.5 list is getting quite short[2].
I propose
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
We've just about worked our way through the list of 0.5.0 blockers and
it would be great to get some of this new hotness into the hands of our
users, so...
I propose the following tag and artifacts for 0.5.0-beta1
SVN
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 22:26 +, ant elder wrote:
Looking at whats been said its quite evenly split with about half
saying RTC could be ok and half suggesting RTC should be frowned upon.
So what to do?
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The current website is quite ugly, and I don't know about you, but I'm
itching to put the new project logo to use, so I'd like to propose
publishing http://cassandra.deadcafe.org (to
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Ian Holsman i...@holsman.net wrote:
I don't think there is any policy or standard about RTC or CTR.
different groups do different things, depending on the community.
so I don't see this as a hang up for graduation.
Me neither, hence my question. What puzzles
Hi guys,
I'd be curious to hear others' opinions but I think Cassandra is close to be
ready for graduation (or at least preparing for it). You came a long way
since the original code dump and now you have both diversity and a vibrant
community. You have 3 successful official releases behind you,
we need to do to make it happen?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Matthieu Riou matth...@offthelip.org
wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd be curious to hear others' opinions but I think Cassandra is close to
be
ready for graduation (or at least preparing for it). You came a long way
since
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Matthieu Riou matth...@offthelip.org
wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd be curious to hear others' opinions but I think Cassandra is close to
be
ready for graduation (or at least preparing for it). You
If there's a meetup I'll try to pass by as well, I won't be at ApacheCon
this year though.
Matthieu
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
I'll also be at/around ApacheCon.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Johan Oskarsson jo...@oskarsson.nu
wrote:
I'll be
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey mentors,
We've had an RC2 vote over on incubator-general and cc'd here for
days. Please vote. This is getting frustrating: we never did finish
the RC1 vote, before it got lapped by RC2.
Remember when I was
Hi guys,
Release practices seem to be getting more and more painful for you so I hope
to clarify as much as possible here. Or at least start a good flame war,
huh, discussion ;)
So Apache has its root in a group of people developing in the open a piece
of software that became massively popular.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Bill de hOra b...@dehora.net wrote:
Chris Goffinet wrote:
REST is nice if you don't control both endpoints (see the public api
example). But does it 'really' make sense internally? There is going to be
some overhead of the constant re-connect over TCP.
So is that meant to be an official Apache release (I'm guessing yes as it's
a final). If so have you seen this?
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
Matthieu
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Voting is over. That's +3
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Johan Oskarsson jo...@oskarsson.nu wrote:
Matthieu Riou wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Johan Oskarsson jo...@oskarsson.nu
wrote:
I'm poking around in the incubator guide to understand the requirements
for a first release. I'm having a hard time
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Johan Oskarsson jo...@oskarsson.nuwrote:
I'm poking around in the incubator guide to understand the requirements
for a first release. I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly what is
needed when it comes to NOTICE files, we have one that is copied from
the
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Johan Oskarsson jo...@oskarsson.nuwrote:
What exactly is needed before we can release the first version of
Cassandra, once the issues assigned to 0.3.0 in Jira are resolved?
I have gone through this document and tried to fix as many of the bits
that jumped
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:24 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrot
Do not include any links on the project website that might encourage
non-developers to download and use nightly builds, snapshots, release
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Jonathan ellis jbel...@gmail.com
wrote:
You're right, it has not been obvious from the ML alone that we were this
close to a RC, but it has been very clear on IRC. My
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do not include any links on the project website that might
Uh, so, it's still an unofficial release right? The release process at
Apache is actually a tad more involved than cutting a tgz, as you can
probably guess just looking at the length of the guide:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
Matthieu
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:29
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@apache.org wrote:
Hey folks,
I thought back and forth about whether this email should go to the
private list or not. But I have a Cocoon background and in Cocoon land
we found it useful to only use the private list when there is really
no
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Ian Holsman i...@holsman.net wrote:
just on a point here.
They were invited from Day 1 (Actually 20-Jan-2009) to be on there. It
wasn't done out of malice.
So I'm slightly confused as to what the PPMC composition is now.
On 08/04/2009, at 6:10 AM, Torsten
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Avinash Lakshman avinash.laksh...@gmail.com
wrote:
snipped
(2) This is something that I have said many times over. Certain things are
the way they are for a reason. For example when I say ConcurrentHashMap is
a
memory hog I say it because we have seen this in
, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Matthieu Riou
matthieu.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Avinash Lakshman
avinash.laksh...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess. Isn't that easier? Is there something else that is the norm?
No norm, just several different options. I personally like when
://geronimo.apache.org/
http://ode.apache.org/
FWIW, a Forrest site has already been contributed so that could be used to
start with until a sexier option is implemented?
Matthieu
Avinash
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Matthieu Riou
matthieu.r...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:25 AM
28 matches
Mail list logo