Re: [VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-29 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Eric Evans and Jun Rao were also recently voted in as committers, although we don't have svn access for them yet. -Jonathan On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Evan Weaverewea...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, ok. Ellis is the only committer who has voted so far:

[RESULTS] [VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-29 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Voting is over. That's +3 from committers in favor. On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote: I propose releasing 0.3.0-rc3 as 0.3.0-final. We've had some unofficial voting on the rc3 thread but this is the official one. :) Voting is open for 72h. binary

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-29 Thread Matthieu Riou
So is that meant to be an official Apache release (I'm guessing yes as it's a final). If so have you seen this? http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Matthieu On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: Voting is over. That's +3

Re: [VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-28 Thread Ian Holsman
just a point of order. only comitters's votes are binding. so if you could mark your vote that way it would be great for the people who are comitters to mark their vote that way. -I On 27/06/2009, at 12:10 PM, Eric Evans wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 12:49 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: I

Re: [VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-28 Thread Evan Weaver
Ah, ok. Ellis is the only committer who has voted so far: http://people.apache.org/~jim/projects.html#cassandra Evan On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Ian Holsmani...@holsman.net wrote: just a point of order. only comitters's votes are binding. so if you could mark your vote that way it

[VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-26 Thread Jonathan Ellis
I propose releasing 0.3.0-rc3 as 0.3.0-final. We've had some unofficial voting on the rc3 thread but this is the official one. :) Voting is open for 72h. binary build is at http://people.apache.org/~jbellis/cassandra/cassandra-0.3.0-rc3.tar.gz svn tag is

Re: [VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-26 Thread Jeff Hodges
+1 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote: I propose releasing 0.3.0-rc3 as 0.3.0-final. We've had some unofficial voting on the rc3 thread but this is the official one. :) Voting is open for 72h. binary build is at

Re: [VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-26 Thread Evan Weaver
+1 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Jeff Hodgesj...@somethingsimilar.com wrote: +1 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote: I propose releasing 0.3.0-rc3 as 0.3.0-final. We've had some unofficial voting on the rc3 thread but this is the official one. :)

Re: [VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-26 Thread Sandeep Tata
+1 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Ellisjbel...@gmail.com wrote: I propose releasing 0.3.0-rc3 as 0.3.0-final. We've had some unofficial voting on the rc3 thread but this is the official one. :) Voting is open for 72h. binary build is at

Re: [VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-26 Thread Chris Goffinet
+1 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Jun Rao jun...@almaden.ibm.com wrote: +1. Jun IBM Almaden Research Center K55/B1, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099 jun...@almaden.ibm.com Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote on 06/26/2009 10:49:43 AM: I propose releasing 0.3.0-rc3 as

Re: [VOTE] 0.3.0-final

2009-06-26 Thread Eric Evans
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 12:49 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: I propose releasing 0.3.0-rc3 as 0.3.0-final. +1 -- Eric Evans eev...@racklabs.com