Jonathan,
I can understand why you refactored the code a lot in the last few month.
And I saw you were working hard to improve it in the last few months.
However, the talents from Facebook has done a lot of work to bring Cassandra
to the world. And they have deployed it to the production system
,
hanzhu
-- Forwarded message --
From: Zhu Han schumi@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: working together
To: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
Jonathan,
I can understand why you have refactored the code a lot in the last few
month. And I saw you were
cautious, should we?
best regards,
hanzhu
-- Forwarded message --
From: Zhu Han schumi@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: working together
To: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
Jonathan,
I can understand why you have refactored the code a lot
Thanks Sandeep.
Would we all be comfortable adopting this process going forward,
hopefully reducing friction, bugs and problems in general?
I assume +1 from me and Sandeep so far.
/Johan
Sandeep Tata wrote:
Johan, the wiki pages are great! I think they will help iron out our
process for
+1
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Johan Oskarsson jo...@oskarsson.nu wrote:
Thanks Sandeep.
Would we all be comfortable adopting this process going forward,
hopefully reducing friction, bugs and problems in general?
I assume +1 from me and Sandeep so far.
/Johan
Sandeep Tata wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 16:49 +0100, Johan Oskarsson wrote:
Thanks Sandeep.
Would we all be comfortable adopting this process going forward,
hopefully reducing friction, bugs and problems in general?
I assume +1 from me and Sandeep so far.
+1
Sandeep Tata wrote:
Johan, the wiki pages
Torsten Curdt wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 05:30, Ian Holsman i...@holsman.net wrote:
guys.
we have a private list to discuss the pro's and con's of people being a
comitter.
keep these personal discussions off the development list. It doesn't help
anyone.
Not sure I agree here. I did not see
+1 for Sandeeps development process suggestions.
In order to address some of the issues brought forward in this thread I
have adapted the following wiki pages from other projects and from
various emails. They could serve as the basis for an initial process.
I think we have a handle on this now. All changes are put on Jira for
review and are not committed until there is at least one +1 from a
reviewer. (I personally prefer post-commit review because manually
attaching and applying patches is tedious but we don't have enough
people following the
The refactoring question seems to be a bit of thorn:
My understanding was that new committers come in and start with some feature
implement that and then slowly start looking into what more they could do
going forward. It is NOT come in and refactor the hell out of the system
because you like
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Sandeep Tata sandeep.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is reasonable that a codebase that has evolved for over two
years has significant opportunity for refactoring when it is opened to
a host of new developers. That said, large scale refactoring *at this
stage*
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@apache.org wrote:
Hey folks,
I thought back and forth about whether this email should go to the
private list or not. But I have a Cocoon background and in Cocoon land
we found it useful to only use the private list when there is really
no
just on a point here.
They were invited from Day 1 (Actually 20-Jan-2009) to be on there. It
wasn't done out of malice.
On 08/04/2009, at 6:10 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
Unfortunately no one noticed that the
actual authors bringing the code were NOT on the private list where
the vote was
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Ian Holsman i...@holsman.net wrote:
just on a point here.
They were invited from Day 1 (Actually 20-Jan-2009) to be on there. It
wasn't done out of malice.
So I'm slightly confused as to what the PPMC composition is now.
On 08/04/2009, at 6:10 AM, Torsten
I don't think I ever spoke about anyone's skills ever over here.
Avinash
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Ian Holsman i...@holsman.net wrote:
Matt.
please don't.
your comments are just as valuable as anyone else's.
just be aware that if you talk about someone's skills on this list, or
their
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Avinash Lakshman avinash.laksh...@gmail.com
wrote:
snipped
(2) This is something that I have said many times over. Certain things are
the way they are for a reason. For example when I say ConcurrentHashMap is
a
memory hog I say it because we have seen this in
(2) This is something that I have said many times over. Certain things are
the way they are for a reason. For example when I say ConcurrentHashMap is a
memory hog I say it because we have seen this in practice. How does it
manifest itself? I obviously do not recall since all this was over
17 matches
Mail list logo