Only when you use interface.
You'd have to edit type and you can't change type of existing object.
paszczi wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to make a readonly version of several classes inside my
projects that are meant to hold data. The flow is:
(1)
DataClass instance with filled properties -
Added the issue to Donjon -
http://support.castleproject.org/projects/FACILITIES/issues/view/FACILITIES-ISSUE-124
On Aug 10, 2:52 pm, John Simons johnsimons...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Not sure if I'm using this facility correctly.
I'm using it on the client side.
I have configured my services
Hi Michael,thanks for the suggestion. But I tried that since it popped up in
some searches from people using NHibernate.
I solved the problem with IMAGE as it is supported by SqlLite and SqlServer
and is also 2^31-1 of length.
Thanks anyway!
greetings Daniel
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:15 AM,
Hmm.. That's a good Question. Actually it will result in a
MonoRailException. Only improvement could be to make it throw a
FormatException so that MonoRail outputs a nicer errormessage. But I believe
failing fast is best here.
Now what made me wonder a bit is how to test this thing. I'm trying to
The ViewComponentParamAttribute has a DefaultValue option, which is
handled in ViewComponent.BindParameter() for comparison.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Daniel Hölblinghoelblin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm.. That's a good Question.
Actually it will result in a MonoRailException. Only
John,
The ChannelFactory create multiple channels and thus will not be closed
when you release the proxy. The actual Channel will be closed however.
Then the component is released or the container is disposed of, the
ChannelFactory will get closed.
craig
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:52 PM, John
Yes
well the name Autenticacao.login in id component must to be reference
with Service name=Autenticacao and endpoit name=login and in your WCF
App
must to be a folder Autenticacao and a file login.svc and inside this
file %@ ServiceHost Language=C# Debug=true
Service=Autenticacao.login
Hi
Are there any plans to move the trunk up to the latest version of
newtonsoft json?
I have tried but my local build went tits up...
:s
--
Cheers,
w://
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle
Another approach I tried was getting connection directly from
ActiveRecord using code:
===
using (var sessionScope = new SessionScope())
{
IDbConnection cn =
ActiveRecordMediator.GetSessionFactoryHolder()
No, not if the connection was provided by NH.
In the code example of your initial post, you managed the connection
explicitly. Why is it a problem then to pass an open session to
DifferentDatabaseScope?
-Markus
2009/8/11 EricP ericpopiv...@gmail.com
Another approach I tried was getting
I've got an ASP.NET website setup using Castle ActiveRecord and
Validator, the website is using a custom Http Module to create/dispose
the SessionScope per request.
Scenario: A request comes in to Modify a customer object.
Customer cm = Customer.Find(customerId);
cm.Mobile =
Okay,We have two distinct requests here.
One is for WCF stuff, and as presented, it looks like life styles can
resolve that.
Second is for additional providers for handlers, for things like MEF, lazy
component discovery, etc.
Is this accruate?
2009/8/11 Krzysztof Koźmic krzysztof.koz...@gmail.com
Hey guys,
Just returned from a quick vacation. I don't think WCF presents any
different scenario than MEF or any lazy discovery. WCF Facility would take
advantage of the same deferred resolution hook to provide WCF managed
proxies that were only defined in the standard system.serviceModel
In that case, I don't understand it, do read the app.config to integrate
with that?
2009/8/11 Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com
Hey guys,
Just returned from a quick vacation. I don't think WCF presents any
different scenario than MEF or any lazy discovery. WCF Facility would take
The original feature request for the WCF Facility was to not require
registering a client component for a WCF interface that is already defined
in the app.config/web.config via the system.serviceModel section. This
makes it nice and DRY to not have to indicate that you want a WCF Facility
managed
I think the [HasManyToAny] was exactly what I was looking for.
Thank you for the replies.
On Aug 11, 12:24 am, Markus Zywitza markus.zywi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jake,
2009/8/10 JakeS jakesteven...@gmail.com
[ActiveRecord]
public class WhiteBoard : ModelBaseWhiteBoard, IRecentUpdated
ActiveRecordMediatorCustomer.Evict(cn);
2009/8/11 Thi thi.saa...@gmail.com
I've got an ASP.NET website setup using Castle ActiveRecord and
Validator, the website is using a custom Http Module to create/dispose
the SessionScope per request.
Scenario: A request comes in to Modify a customer
Okay, now that I understand it, it is the same, yes.I'll start a new thread
with thoughts about the whole topic
2009/8/11 Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com
The original feature request for the WCF Facility was to not require
registering a client component for a WCF interface that is already
forgot to mention, the new thread is going to be in the dev group, which is
more appropriate
2009/8/11 Ayende Rahien aye...@ayende.com
Okay, now that I understand it, it is the same, yes.I'll start a new
thread with thoughts about the whole topic
2009/8/11 Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com
I'm sorry I forgot to mention I'm using AR RC3 (the app has to be
running on top of .NET 2.0)
On Aug 11, 12:54 pm, Markus Zywitza markus.zywi...@gmail.com wrote:
ActiveRecordMediatorCustomer.Evict(cn);
2009/8/11 Thi thi.saa...@gmail.com
I've got an ASP.NET website setup using Castle
I'm trying to databind to a property that's defined as an Enum like
so:
[Flags]
public enum SystemChecks
{
Fire = 1,
CarbonMonoxide = 2,
Flood = 4,
Medical = 8
}
[ActiveRecord]
public class JobInformation : ModelBaseJobInformation
{
[Property]
public SystemChecks SystemIncludes {
Sorry, alt +tab doesn't increase indent here, it goes to SEND
Here's what I was trying to say:
I'm trying to databind to a property that's defined as an Enum. I
looked at
Ok, I finally getting back to this.
The classes I'm passing over the wire look something like this:
[DataContract]
public class SomeDto
{
[DataMember]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public virtual DateTime? LastUpdatedAt { get; set; }
Ok, I just read Ayende's post here:
http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2009/08/07/nhibernate-amp-inotifypropertychanged.aspx
It is really similar to what I am thinking about. I just want to do
this when WCF provides me the instance, rather than NHibernate.
I think maybe it's my WCF ignorance that's
Ok, I think that I've discovered the solution I was looking for.
I need to implement IClientMessageFormatter on the Silverlight client,
and plugin the proxy generation there.
Once I get this working, I'll post about it on my blog.
On Aug 11, 3:41 pm, Christopher Bennage
This is just off the top of my head untested, but here goes
PropertyBag[CurSysCheckNameList]=Enum.GetName(typeof(SystemChecks),
CurrentJobInformation.SystemIncludes).Split(new char[] {',', ' '},
StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
#foreach($SysCheck in $CurSystemChecks)
input
You can use something like this: http://gist.github.com/166110 to set up
the interception.
Interface proxy with target is a class that implements an interface, and
calls to that interface members are forwarded to the target class, which
obviously also have to implement that interface.
Thanks Craig, you've got it bang on in one, and cheers Ayende, a custom
Lifecycle would be just what Im looking for to work in unison with the lazy
loading mechanism.
Adam Langley
Senior Developer
www.winscribe.com
Please consider the environment before printing this email!
From:
I will put up a post about this shortly.
2009/8/11 Christopher Bennage christop...@bluespireconsulting.com
Ok, I just read Ayende's post here:
http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2009/08/07/nhibernate-amp-inotifypropertychanged.aspx
It is really similar to what I am thinking about. I just want
Craig,
So, you are saying that the ChannelFactory is reused but the Channel
is not.
Also, you are saying that if I call container.Release(proxy); the
channel will be disposed.
I don't see this happening, I'm using the trunk version and have put
break points on your code pretty much everywhere I
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:04 PM, John Simons johnsimons...@yahoo.com.auwrote:
Craig,
So, you are saying that the ChannelFactory is reused but the Channel
is not.
Basically yes. If a channel is faulted it is automatically refreshed.
Also, you are saying that if I call
thanks for your answer. it works when i am using
ActiveRecordMediator.Save(item) instead of inheriting
ActiveRecordBase. but i only call insert method once. but first i get
instence of this class from windsor container. after i call this
method it overflows but nothing entered to db. am i doing
From your screenshot your code looks like this:
public void Insert(T item)
{
try {
Insert(item);// the function calls itself again -
infinite recursion
}
catch
{
}
}
Unless I'm missing something.
olcay şeker wrote:
thanks for your answer. it works when i
33 matches
Mail list logo
