Hi, I want to know if I can save the master register and all its
children with just one save(), just like:
Father f = new Father();
Child c1 = new Child();
Child c2 = new Child();
f.children = new ListChild();
f.children.add(c1);
f.children.add(c2);
f.save();
So,
I changed my relation to:
Try setting inverse to true. I'm not sure what the AR syntax looks
like, but with NH mappings it would look like this:
bag name=children cascade=save-update inverse=true
many-to-one type=Child/
/bag
I would also recommend encapsulating the Child collection within the
Father class. I usually do
Hi Jason, the Invert works.
So I try to insert another child to father and save again.
The commands now was:
1 insert
3 updates in the old childs..
this 3 updates is not necessary.
Thanks,
Jason Meckley wrote:
Try setting inverse to true. I'm not sure what the AR syntax looks
like, but with
once the father is saved, you should not need to explicitly call save
again.
You may also need to associate the child to the parent, otherwise AR
(NH) will be updating the relationship each time.
object id;
using(var tx = session.BeginTransaction())
{
var f = new Father();
id =
Many thanks.
One last thing, do you know a good tutorial documentation about castle
AR ?
Jason Meckley wrote:
once the father is saved, you should not need to explicitly call save
again.
You may also need to associate the child to the parent, otherwise AR
(NH) will be updating the
#1: you return true to SupportsBrowserValidation, which can't be right,
since you're calling a service which can really only be Server-Side, since
it's accessing the persistence layer of your Model.
#2: the ValidationAttribute(s) have no knowledge of the container unless you
supply that
I think you could use http://commonservicelocator.codeplex.com/; for
this since otherwise you couldn't access the container.
On Feb 9, 6:28 am, Yannis yannis.psar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have spent over 2 days on this and havent found a good solution so
far so I think its time to ask
no i dont want to register it with the container - that would also not
work.
I could use the container or the common service location mentioned
below but i dont want to couple the attribute with the process of
looking up the service from some container.
I want it to be a simple constructor
Of course others have written custom attributes.
The problem is that you're trying to make attributes do something they're
just not really designed for.
Instead of approaching the problem from the attribute side, try coming at it
from the Validator side.
Take a look at the
You can't use a constructor dependency, but you could use a property
dependency, much the way you have to deal with action filters in asp.netmvc:
http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele/archive/2009/11/04/using-windsor-to-inject-dependencies-into-asp-net-mvc-actionfilters.aspx
Oh sweet. I hadn't thought about that. that's much easier than my recent
suggestion.
From: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
[mailto:castle-project-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Alex Henderson
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:45 AM
To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
Hi all,
Anyone have an example to build an App using ASP.NET MVC 1.0 +
NHibernate 2.1 and Castle.Windsor ?
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to this group, send email to
can you ask any broader question?
Krzysztof
On 2010-02-09 15:14, Leonardo Lima wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone have an example to build an App using ASP.NET MVC 1.0 +
NHibernate 2.1 and Castle.Windsor ?
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle
What is the meaning of life???
Check out http://www.sharparchitecture.net/
;-)
2010/2/9 Krzysztof Koźmic krzysztof.koz...@gmail.com
can you ask any broader question?
Krzysztof
On 2010-02-09 15:14, Leonardo Lima wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone have an example to build an App using ASP.NET
3 different technologies solving 3 different problems, used together
to create an application. If you understand how to use each framework
independent of the others it's just matter of tying the 3 together.
which become simple, once you understand the frameworks.
On Feb 9, 4:29 pm, Adam Toseland
Billy McCafferty has; he calls it Sharp Architecture, as Aunt Google
would have told you on simply pasting your question there...
-Markus
2010/2/9 Leonardo Lima goo...@leonardolima.com.br:
Hi all,
Anyone have an example to build an App using ASP.NET MVC 1.0 +
NHibernate 2.1 and
Stefann
On Feb 8, 6:09 pm, Stefan Sedich stefan.sed...@gmail.com wrote:
I ended up creating a custom lifestyle and used the CallContext for storage
instead of using Thread.SetData like the Thread lifestyle manager does.
Seems to work with no issues for me at the moment.
Trunk has a brand-new feature called IConversation for session
management in GUIs.
Docs: http://using.castleproject.org/display/AR/Using+the+Conversation+Pattern
-Markus
2010/2/10 Blair system.predic...@gmail.com:
Hi I would like to know how best to use Active Record with a
Repository
18 matches
Mail list logo
