Re: Problems with sample app

2010-07-14 Thread TommyNZ
Fantastic. Thanks for your help John. Cheers Tommy On Jul 13, 10:17 pm, John Simons johnsimons...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Hi Tommy, We are currently in the process of migrating documentation to a new site. Please download the latest getting started sample

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread Jason Meckley
the list seems very good. I'm especially looking forward to windsor 2.5. I could see merging binders, transform filters and the core framework into a single assembly. I would keep test support in a separate assembly though. the idea of deploying stub objects, designed for testing, into production

Re: AR: multi-tenancy support

2010-07-14 Thread Markus
Hi Markus! This idea comes closer to what I was thinking about, yes. I'm just wondering if this approach also works well together with the existing configuration schema and the possibility to add config nodes for differtent databases based on base-class types? Let's say I have 5 tenant databases

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread Ken Egozi
well it costs next to nothing, and is not JITted of not used, and the benefit of simpler distribution and maintenance outweigh the couple of bytes it takes in the .dll On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jason Meckley jasonmeck...@gmail.comwrote: the list seems very good. I'm especially looking

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread Jason Meckley
true. it's more of preference then preformance. On Jul 14, 7:53 am, Ken Egozi egoz...@gmail.com wrote: well it costs next to nothing, and is not JITted of not used, and the benefit of simpler distribution and maintenance outweigh the couple of bytes it takes in the .dll On Wed, Jul 14, 2010

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread John Simons
Thanks for the feedback Jason. BTW, are you also using the WebServer shipped in the Castle.MonoRail.TestSupport assembly? Cheers John From: Jason Meckley jasonmeck...@gmail.com To: Castle Project Users castle-project-users@googlegroups.com Sent: Wed, 14

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread Jason Meckley
no, i'm not familiar with the MR web server On Jul 14, 8:22 am, John Simons johnsimons...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Thanks for the feedback Jason. BTW, are you also using the WebServer shipped in the Castle.MonoRail.TestSupport assembly? Cheers John From:

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread Ken Egozi
MR will benefit from eliminating a fair amount of code, which needs maintenance On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Jason Meckley jasonmeck...@gmail.comwrote: no, i'm not familiar with the MR web server On Jul 14, 8:22 am, John Simons johnsimons...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Thanks for the feedback

Re: Windsor Registration Quesion

2010-07-14 Thread Bill Barry
Stefan Sedich wrote: interface IRepositoryTKey, TEntity { } interface ICustomerRepository : IRepositoryGuid, Customer { } class CustomerRepository : ICustomerRepository { } container.Register( AllTypes.FromAssembly(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly())

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread John Simons
Yes, there is a lot of code that can be eliminated. I'm actually looking at removing all the routing and replacing it with MS version, this will possibly be done for v2.5. I'm removing WebServer from Castle.MonoRail.TestSupport in preparation for merging, if anyone has any concerns please speak

StatelessSessionScope problem

2010-07-14 Thread Dan Jasek
I have a tree structure in a database I am accessing through AR. My goal is a function to walk the tree. I want to put this in a stateless session because the tree can be very large and I don't want to spend the resources on the first level cache if it is not necissary. But I can't seem to get