Hm, what do you mean by using the other value?
I replace a componenten for instance in the following scenario:
I have a WinForm app. The app works with Navigators,Views and Presenters. A
view may be a Navigator
by itself and handles Subviews, similar to the settings dialog in Visual
Studio. The
Hello,
I'm currently developing a WPF application using the MVVM pattern and
I'm looking for a way to separate my Active Record (AR) classes in my
model from the rest of my application. Currently I have a few classes
mapped to my database and some methods creating an interface for my
persistence
I would think you would want to handle this by loading multiple named
implementors of ISubNavigator into the container. Then just pull the one
out that you want using the named value.
2011/2/22 Belvasis belvasis...@googlemail.com
Hm, what do you mean by using the other value?
I replace a
ActiveRecord can be fully used without inheriting ActiveRecordBase, see
http://www.castleproject.org/activerecord/documentation/trunk/advanced/mediator.html
http://www.castleproject.org/activerecord/documentation/trunk/advanced/mediator.htmlInstead
of using the static methods e.g. Post.FindAll(),
Hm...but all of my presenters and views are in separate Feature assemblies
and they rely on a constant name for the ISubNavigator. Sure there
are ways to avoid this, but i thought i could solve this using the container
without the need of additional code.
2011/2/22 Ryan Langton
Hi Christian
I'd recommend using AutoMapper to map your AR objects to your view
models. This is the best solution no matter what persistence framework
you are using. You can leave the persistence layer out completely for
testing and visual design.
DDD fans might even introduce a separated domain
Can you create a testcase so we can reproduce it?
On Feb 21, 9:41 am, Thiago Silva thiagos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, languanghao,
Did you solve your issue?? I've the same problem.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:46 PM, languanghao languan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I used
