var facility = new MutableConfiguration(facility);
// isWeb indicates to facility wee are in web context, so it'll use
SessionWebModule httpModule
// to setup session context for the duration of web request
facility.Attribute(isWeb, true).CreateChild(factory).Attribute(id,
nhibernate.factory);
using Castle.MicroKernel.Resolvers.SpecializedResolvers.ListResolver ?
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Stuart Laughlin stu...@bistrotech.netwrote:
I was surprised when I discovered that this test fails with a
NotImplementedException originating from
IListFoo.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Stuart Laughlin stu...@bistrotech.netwrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Victor Kornov wee...@gmail.com wrote:
using Castle.MicroKernel.Resolvers.SpecializedResolvers.ListResolver ?
Ah, very nice!
Only how do I use it? I can't find much help
There is also [DoNotWire] attrib in Castle.Core
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Paul Hatcher pa...@grassoc.co.uk wrote:
Is there a way of telling Castle not to wire up properties via the
fluent interface, i.e. to just do constructor injection?
Not sure if PropertyInspector supports specifying wiring behaviour through
configuration. If it is, then you can build custom extension for
registration API to control that.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Paul Hatcher pa...@grassoc.co.uk wrote:
I'm trying to avoid coupling the assembly to
private IPresenter InitializePresenter(object view)
{
IDictionary arguments = new Hashtable(1);
arguments.Add(view, view);
IPresenter presenter = IoC.ResolveIPresenter(_presenterType, arguments);
presenter.Initialize();
PresentersCache.Put(view, presenter);
return presenter;
}
public abstract
AFAIK, ID of lazy-loaded entity is available without fetching it from the
DB.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Bill Barry after.fall...@gmail.com wrote:
Danyal Aytekin wrote:
Do you need to have both? You could have the first and then to access
the ID you could use Report.ReportID (or
Is AbstractPerson an abstract class? Then how binder should know what class
to instantiate?
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:24 AM, agilejedi d...@agilejedi.com wrote:
Trying to make this action work:
public void Save([ARDataBind(person)] AbstractPerson[] people){
}
people always returns empty. I
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/49912/best-dotnet-memory-and-performance-profiler
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Stefan Sedich stefan.sed...@gmail.comwrote:
I would suggest getting a tool like ANTS profiler to see if you can
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
IIRC, I've seen it on googlecode...
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Ken Egozi egoz...@gmail.com wrote:
coool.
btw, my blog runs on a hacked-together MR/Windsor/AR thing. very rough as
I have no time to make things better.
I'll put it on gitHub if you'd like to try and customise it for
Using asp.net response filters?
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:54 PM, James Curran james.cur...@gmail.comwrote:
3) If the answer to #2, is Yes, where should it be inserted.
(Right now, it's an extension method on Controller, so calling
'this.RenderTrace('trace);' will put the full HTML of the
a href=Url.For( )
img name=... src=... /
/a
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
=$Url.For(%{controller='product', action='pageName', params=
{prodId=199
On Feb 11, 10:23 am, Victor Kornov wee...@gmail.com wrote:
a href=Url.For( )
img name=... src=... /
/a
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
+1
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Colin Ramsay colinram...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't Url.create be Url.Create, anyway?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to
This cries for at least to mention those other patterns.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Markus Zywitza markus.zywi...@gmail.comwrote:
The Domain Model is not the only enterprise pattern that
yields maintainable software.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
Look for Projections
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Wayne Douglas wa...@codingvista.comwrote:
Normally I'd use LLBLGEN to grab the data into a more reasonable object and
then serialize that - I'm trying to use NHibernate here as much as I can but
a bit pressed for time to get a prototype
Could be a switch on Routing Engine/routing rule level.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Colin Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This leads me to the question: should routing be bypassed like this?
Would it be better if there was some kind of check for a matching
route even if the physical
You want your custom (different from default) logic for binding collections.
Seems natural to build your own parameter binder :)
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Mike Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
What is the best way to send a collection of composed objects in a
request for databinding
simplest: YourEntity.FindAll() = that's option A.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Welkson Renny de Medeiros
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys!
Information on Telerik Manual:
Reports can use any of the following data sources:
a.. Any component that implements IEnumerable, including
This may have the answer http://hammett.castleproject.org/?p=260
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Jan Limpens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How could I test that?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle
IContext.CurrentUser = inject the context to service. At different
times/projects I had that CurrentUser on IAuthenticationService,
IAccountService etc.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Colin Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is more of a general IoC question, but I'm using Windsor so it
I'm not a VM user, so don't know.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Jan Limpens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to legally download a (readonly) vm of a regular xp to
try that out?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
btw, is there a reason for that other than AR/NH being incapable (or we) to
do that simpler way (i.e. just detaching it from relevan aggregate root)?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Ken Egozi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
create ICartRepository in the domain layer and ARCartRepository in the
Some time ago, when I encountered similar problem with AspView, I've toyed
with the idea of MailController. You know, like there are alredy
RescueController. That turned out to be too much work for me at the moment.
Having such controller would allow for helpers and components in the view.
On the
For that, text templating engine needs to be decoupled from the ViewEngine
itself. That's the only thing you need here, no?
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Ken Egozi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am thinking of taking it to the other extreme.
I want to invest some time into allowing the use of
And some kind of context, different from web context. So, View engine could
operate in either environment.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Victor Kornov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For that, text templating engine needs to be decoupled from the ViewEngine
itself. That's the only thing you need
Won't it be available on source servers like the rest of FW? But that will
be next to useless in such situation considering license problems.I guess
that could help with internal projects though :)
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:23 AM, hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good point, I dont think
man, I'd leave old things alone and use Monorail for new dev...
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Wayne Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I'm updating a fairly complex app - the problem I have is that there are
hundreds of reports each with databound graphs, maps and tables that
need to be
Depends on what you need. It doesn't seem to be able to pass ctor params
either.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Wayne Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
BuildManager.CreateInstanceFromVirtualPath
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Confirmed, that works. I've moved from ValidateIsUniqueAttribute later
anyways.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Eric Hauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One way would be to create a new validation registry that mimics the
behavior of CachedValidationRegistry, but ignores that particular
30 matches
Mail list logo
