RE: Last change to register kernel dependencies

2011-04-25 Thread Adam Langley
-project-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Last change to register kernel dependencies I looked at IlazyComponentLoader, but that only kicks in if nothing is registered... Well isn't that what you need? It seems to be the case from what you said in just before resolution, it's dependencies

Re: Last change to register kernel dependencies

2011-04-25 Thread Krzysztof Koźmic
From: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com on behalf of Krzysztof Kozmic Sent: Mon 25/04/2011 5:48 p.m. To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Last change to register kernel dependencies I looked at IlazyComponentLoader, but that only kicks in if nothing is registered... Well

RE: Last change to register kernel dependencies

2011-04-25 Thread Adam Langley
: Re: Last change to register kernel dependencies I'm obviously not seeing the whole picture but I get the feeling that an asynchronous publish/subscribe architecture with message passing might work better than synchronous RPC via remoting. Are there any particular reasons why you want to do

Last change to register kernel dependencies

2011-04-24 Thread Adam Langley
I require a way to get a last chance to register a components dependencies before resolution occurs. I am writing a custom facility, but I need to first register a component which has missing dependencies, then just before resolution, it's dependencies are registered. What extension points

Re: Last change to register kernel dependencies

2011-04-24 Thread Krzysztof Koźmic
I looked at IlazyComponentLoader, but that only kicks in if nothing is registered... Well isn't that what you need? It seems to be the case from what you said in just before resolution, it's dependencies are registered Can you elaborate a bit more why you need that behaviour and what