Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread Jason Meckley
the list seems very good. I'm especially looking forward to windsor 2.5. I could see merging binders, transform filters and the core framework into a single assembly. I would keep test support in a separate assembly though. the idea of deploying stub objects, designed for testing, into production

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread Ken Egozi
well it costs next to nothing, and is not JITted of not used, and the benefit of simpler distribution and maintenance outweigh the couple of bytes it takes in the .dll On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jason Meckley jasonmeck...@gmail.comwrote: the list seems very good. I'm especially looking

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread Jason Meckley
true. it's more of preference then preformance. On Jul 14, 7:53 am, Ken Egozi egoz...@gmail.com wrote: well it costs next to nothing, and is not JITted of not used, and the benefit of simpler distribution and maintenance outweigh the couple of bytes it takes in the .dll On Wed, Jul 14, 2010

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread John Simons
, 2010 10:19:55 PM Subject: Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap true. it's more of preference then preformance. On Jul 14, 7:53 am, Ken Egozi egoz...@gmail.com wrote: well it costs next to nothing, and is not JITted of not used, and the benefit of simpler distribution and maintenance outweigh the couple

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread Jason Meckley
: Jason Meckley jasonmeck...@gmail.com To: Castle Project Users castle-project-users@googlegroups.com Sent: Wed, 14 July, 2010 10:19:55 PM Subject: Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap true. it's more of preference then preformance. On Jul 14, 7:53 am, Ken Egozi egoz...@gmail.com wrote: well it costs

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread Ken Egozi
:55 PM Subject: Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap true. it's more of preference then preformance. On Jul 14, 7:53 am, Ken Egozi egoz...@gmail.com wrote: well it costs next to nothing, and is not JITted of not used, and the benefit of simpler distribution and maintenance outweigh

Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-14 Thread John Simons
up? Cheers John From: Ken Egozi egoz...@gmail.com To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com Sent: Wed, 14 July, 2010 11:54:18 PM Subject: Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap MR will benefit from eliminating a fair amount of code, which needs maintenance On Wed

Monorail v2.1 roadmap

2010-07-13 Thread John Simons
Dear Monorail users, This upcoming release is mostly (see below) a bugfix release, therefore, there shouldn't be any breaking changes unless is part of a bug fix but even those will be documented as part of the release. So if you are using v2.0 or earlier and have one or more pesty bugs