Why not have your object inherit IStartable? you still get static checking
and you don't need to be explicit about this when registering the component.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to this group, send email to
because we don't want to force anyone to inherit startable
On 04/02/2011 11:16 PM, Jason Meckley wrote:
Why not have your object inherit IStartable? you still get static
checking and you don't need to be explicit about this when registering
the component.
--
You received this message because
it could be, but I'm not sure that would be possible without heavily
rebuilding the entire fluent API.
On 04/02/2011 11:22 AM, Adam Langley wrote:
Hi Team,
I have been using the StartableFacility during the registration of my service.
My service is publicly registered as an interface, but the
Kozmic
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 2:24 p.m.
To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: query about StartableFacility extension methods
it could be, but I'm not sure that would be possible without heavily
rebuilding the entire fluent API.
On 04/02/2011 11:22 AM, Adam Langley wrote:
Hi
[mailto:castle-project-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Krzysztof Kozmic
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 2:56 p.m.
To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: query about StartableFacility extension methods
Also remember that if you want to avoid casting you may specify the name
ask!
Adam Langley
-Original Message-
From: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
[mailto:castle-project-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Krzysztof Kozmic
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 2:24 p.m.
To: castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: query about StartableFacility
