Should we integrate Castle.ActiveRecord.Linq into AR?

2009-03-11 Thread Markus Zywitza
What's your opinion? I think it's stable enough and we dropped 2.0 support nonetheless. -Markus --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: Should we integrate Castle.ActiveRecord.Linq into AR?

2009-03-11 Thread Jonathon Rossi
Castle trunk is both .NET 3.5 for building as well as deployment, AFAIK. The only thing building and running on .NET 2.0 is Castle.Core and DynamicProxy2 to provide more options for third party libraries that use them. On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Gauthier Segay

Re: Should we integrate Castle.ActiveRecord.Linq into AR?

2009-03-11 Thread Robert C. Reyes
There is ActiveRecord.Linq? I'll torture myself for not knowing it. On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Jonathon Rossi j...@jonorossi.com wrote: Castle trunk is both .NET 3.5 for building as well as deployment, AFAIK. The only thing building and running on .NET 2.0 is Castle.Core and