Re: [Catalog-sig] [PSF-Board] Troubled by changes to PyPI usage agreement

2010-01-25 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Martin v. Löwis wrote: Terry Reedy wrote: On 1/23/2010 5:03 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: Indeed, that's what we are discussing here. And, I can only repeat myself: anybody can download the data and redistribute it in any way they like. This is how it is, and how it should be. Many sites

Re: [Catalog-sig] [PSF-Board] Troubled by changes to PyPI usage agreement

2010-01-25 Thread VanL
On 1/23/2010 7:46 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: That's a tricky one: That extra sentence I further affirm... introduces a restriction that goes beyond what US developers normally have to follow. And the way it is written, it also applies to developers not affected by US law. However, that

Re: [Catalog-sig] [PSF-Board] Troubled by changes to PyPI usage agreement

2010-01-25 Thread Terry Reedy
On 1/25/2010 9:39 AM, VanL wrote: Also see MvL for the thought that went into the current wording. As I have stated before, the wording doesn't grant the PSF the authority to relicense or make derivative works of the content. Rather, it allows the PSF (and mirrors, and people who use PyPI) to