On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 10:02 +0100, Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 28-02-13 21:08, holger krekel wrote:
I have seen that position in this discussion (I have to upload 120
files per release, so I won't do that, for instance).
haven't seen that.
Marc-Andre Lemburg said this, which I took to
On 01.03.2013 10:02, Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 28-02-13 21:08, holger krekel wrote:
I have seen that position in this discussion (I have to upload 120
files per release, so I won't do that, for instance).
haven't seen that.
Marc-Andre Lemburg said this, which I took to mean 120 uploads
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 10:24 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 01.03.2013 10:02, Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 28-02-13 21:08, holger krekel wrote:
I have seen that position in this discussion (I have to upload 120
files per release, so I won't do that, for instance).
haven't seen that.
Hi Richard, all,
somewhere deep in the threads i mentioned i wrote a little cleanpypi.py
script which takes a project name as an argument and then goes to
pypi.python.org and removes all homepage/download metadata entries for
this project. This sanitizes/speeds up installation because
On 01.03.2013 11:19, holger krekel wrote:
Hi Richard, all,
somewhere deep in the threads i mentioned i wrote a little cleanpypi.py
script which takes a project name as an argument and then goes to
pypi.python.org and removes all homepage/download metadata entries for
this project. This
On Friday, March 1, 2013 at 6:04 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 01.03.2013 11:19, holger krekel wrote:
Hi Richard, all,
somewhere deep in the threads i mentioned i wrote a little cleanpypi.py
script which takes a project name as an argument and then goes to
pypi.python.org
On Friday, March 1, 2013 at 6:04 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 01.03.2013 11:19, holger krekel wrote:
Hi Richard, all,
somewhere deep in the threads i mentioned i wrote a little cleanpypi.py
script which takes a project name as an argument and then goes to
pypi.python.org
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:09 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Friday, March 1, 2013 at 6:04 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 01.03.2013 11:19, holger krekel wrote:
Hi Richard, all,
somewhere deep in the threads i mentioned i wrote a little cleanpypi.py
script which takes a project name
Marc Andre: I'm cc'ing Van: can you explain why the pypi terms are a bummer so
we can see if there is actually an issue to be resolved or a matter of taste?
We need to protect the foundation while preserving author rights - but I don't
want one user / subset dictating how we evolve the
On 01.03.2013 12:30, Jesse Noller wrote:
Marc Andre: I'm cc'ing Van: can you explain why the pypi terms are a bummer
so we can see if there is actually an issue to be resolved or a matter of
taste?
We need to protect the foundation while preserving author rights - but I
don't want one
On 01.03.2013 13:18, Jesse Noller wrote:
I am subscribed: I made the list. We're both board directors too. Changes to
the tos should come from legal counsel, and the board
Van and all others who are interested as well ?
On Mar 1, 2013, at 6:47 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On
Either the tos is preventing pypi tech, security and distribution enhancements,
or they aren't.
If its the latter: then we can stop trotting them out as a reason to grossly
improve our services and infrastructure.
On Mar 1, 2013, at 6:47 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 01.03.2013
On 01.03.2013 12:47, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 01.03.2013 12:30, Jesse Noller wrote:
Marc Andre: I'm cc'ing Van: can you explain why the pypi terms are a bummer
so we can see if there is actually an issue to be resolved or a matter of
taste?
We need to protect the foundation while preserving
Okie doke. So we can move on to putting up the CDN and deprecating external
links for now?
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:56 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 01.03.2013 12:47, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 01.03.2013 12:30, Jesse Noller wrote:
Marc Andre: I'm cc'ing Van: can you explain why
On 01.03.2013 15:02, Jesse Noller wrote:
Okie doke. So we can move on to putting up the CDN and deprecating external
links for now?
I don't think anyone is against putting up a CDN. It should meet
the same security requirements we have for the pypi server itself,
ie. HTTPS all the way, proper
Please forward to catalog-sig if this gets bounced. I'm not on that list.
I drafted these terms of service. I know they are broad. They were made exactly
as broad as was needed.
This was not the case that we took the cheap-and-easy route of a maximal rights
grant. (And besides, it would have
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 15:11 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 01.03.2013 15:02, Jesse Noller wrote:
Okie doke. So we can move on to putting up the CDN and deprecating external
links for now?
I don't think anyone is against putting up a CDN. It should meet
the same security requirements we
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:17 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:09 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Friday, March 1, 2013 at 6:04 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 01.03.2013 11:19, holger krekel wrote:
Hi Richard, all,
somewhere deep in the threads i
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:24 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 01.03.2013 10:02, Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 28-02-13 21:08, holger krekel wrote:
I have seen that position in this discussion (I have to upload 120
files per release, so I won't do that, for instance).
haven't seen
Hi Van,
please read my long posting to the python-legal list. This explains the
concerns and makes suggestions on how to improve things in a way
that is compatible with what PyPI is and how it is used today:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-legal-sig/2013-March/00.html
PS: I'd prefer
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:37 AM, PJ Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:24 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 01.03.2013 10:02, Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 28-02-13 21:08, holger krekel wrote:
I have seen that position in this discussion (I have to upload 120
Thank for the feedback, Holger and Phillip. I'll bake this into
a version 0.2 of the proposal over the weekend.
On 01.03.2013 17:29, PJ Eby wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:17 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:09 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Friday, March
On Friday, March 1, 2013 at 2:31 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 01.03.2013 12:17, holger krekel wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:09 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Friday, March 1, 2013 at 6:04 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 01.03.2013 11:19, holger krekel wrote:
Hi Richard, all,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:31 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Hmm, then why not remove links that don't match the above from
the /simple/ index pages ?
PyPI provides the links uninterpreted since the tools' interpretations
have evolved over time.
Note that it's easily possible to make
On 01.03.2013 23:50, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:31 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Hmm, then why not remove links that don't match the above from
the /simple/ index pages ?
I think we can do that, but if we *start* with that, we will just
suddenly, with no
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 23:50 +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:31 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Hmm, then why not remove links that don't match the above from
the /simple/ index pages ?
I think we can do that, but if we *start* with that, we will just
26 matches
Mail list logo
