Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I think what Laura wants is different: she doesn't want package owners
to be able to opt out of ratings (for their own sake), but the feature
be removed altogether, for the sake of users which she considers misled
by ratings (IIUC).
Yes, but given the choice between:
-
In a message of Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:49:16 GMT, Chris Withers writes:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I think what Laura wants is different: she doesn't want package owners
to be able to opt out of ratings (for their own sake), but the feature
be removed altogether, for the sake of users which she
Am 01.12.2009 um 20:39 schrieb Martin v. Löwis:
So it might be best to implement what appears as middle-ground,
i.e. allow package authors to opt out of comments.
+1
Jannis
___
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG@python.org
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
The poll is now closed, with these results
Allow ratings and comments on all packages (status quo) 237
Allow package owners to disallow comments (ratings unmodified). 139
Allow comments, but only send them to package owners (ratings
unmodified). 33
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
But I think that getting rid of the ratings is is also important.
I don't think this is consensus.
That's because the poll didn't really allow people to clearly express
their views, which was the point of what Laura was saying.
I, too, would like to see ratings be
The poll is now closed, with these results
Allow ratings and comments on all packages (status quo) 237
Allow package owners to disallow comments (ratings unmodified). 139
Allow comments, but only send them to package owners (ratings
unmodified).33
Disallow comments (ratings unmodified). 24
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
My interpretation is that the result is inconclusive. A clear majority
does want a comment facility (in some form); another (not so clear)
majority wants to see something changed.
So it might be best to implement what
On 07:39 pm, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
The poll is now closed, with these results
Allow ratings and comments on all packages (status quo) 237
Allow package owners to disallow comments (ratings unmodified). 139
Allow comments, but only send them to package owners (ratings
unmodified).33
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.dewrote:
The poll is now closed, with these results
Allow ratings and comments on all packages (status quo) 237
Allow package owners to disallow comments (ratings unmodified). 139
Allow comments, but only send them to package
In a message of Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:39:50 +0100, Martin v. Löwis writes:
The poll is now closed, with these results
Allow ratings and comments on all packages (status quo)237
Allow package owners to disallow comments (ratings unmodified).13
9
Allow comments, but only send them to
-Original Message-
From: catalog-sig-bounces+noah=coderanger@python.org
[mailto:catalog-sig-bounces+noah=coderanger@python.org] On Behalf
Of Martin v. Löwis
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 11:40 AM
To: catalog-sig
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Poll results
The poll is now
But I think that getting rid of the ratings is is also important.
I don't think this is consensus.
Regards,
Martin
___
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote:
Had you oranised the poll this way, you would have found me in the
'ratings prohibited/comments opt-in' camp. So, of course I think
that allowing package authors to opt-out is a good idea.
But I think that getting rid of
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.dewrote:
Can we switch to using Disqus (http://disqus.com/) or similar service
that
is a little easier on the eyes (and has some moderation tools, etc etc)?
I wouldn't know how to do that, and I'm not sure what it means (i.e.
14 matches
Mail list logo
