Hi there,
Python eggs and zc.buildout are playing a major role in Zope world - both
for development and deployment. PyPI right now is apparently a
single-point-of-failure. Although the availability of PyPI become much
better over time, the complete infrastructure is not highly available which
--On 28. August 2008 16:30:27 +0200 Joachim König-Baltes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I got aware of pySSH_Monitor through my RSS reader. Trying to
download
the code by clicking on the download link on pypi I got redirected to
www.pypi.info
that requires registration through invitation
--On 13. September 2008 22:42:14 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that you can upload documentation for packages in PyPI, so I
took advantage of that for the lockfile module:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/lockfile
http://packages.python.org/lockfile/
I don't see any links to
Hi there,
I would like to inform you that we created the PyPI replication
project hosted on Launchpad. Driven by the needs of the Zope world
using zc.buildout intensively, we created a package z3c.pypimirror
for mirroring the packages directly hosted on PyPI on a local server.
This removed
Am 09.10.2008 14:32 Uhr, Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
In phase 1 of the project (upcoming soon) we will provide a number of
independent machines (up to five servers) with a full copy of all
packages hosted directly on PyPI.
Did you consider offering to host and manage PyPI *instead* of creating
Am 09.10.2008 17:18 Uhr, Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
Did you consider offering to host and manage PyPI *instead* of creating
this mirror?
What is the background for this question? Right now we have the problem
that we must have the eggs and source code archive available for doing
buildout - we
Am 09.10.2008 18:36 Uhr, Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
If there would be an easy way to replicate the PyPI backend (no idea
about the implementation - any RDBMS involved) then there are likely
volunteers taking over the resources for a mirror of the current backend.
I don't think a mirror would
Am 09.10.2008 18:59 Uhr, Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
Mirrors help every other packaging system. So it stands to reason
that it would help pypi too. I think since many zope people have been
using mirrors instead of using pypi directly... pypi has been more
available. It's running lots better for
On 10.10.2008 8:38 Uhr, Tarek Ziade wrote:
2008/10/10 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am 09.10.2008 18:59 Uhr, Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
Mirrors help every other packaging system. So it stands to
reason
that it would help pypi
On 12.10.2008 19:58 Uhr, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Sorry... this is more speculation than based on actual knowledge, but I
think there are feasible ways to do these things.
PyPI provides mirrors with a changelog where they can efficiently ask
for a list of packages that have changed since they
On 23.12.2008 4:21 Uhr, James Utter wrote:
Hello,
I don't know if this is the right place to report this, so please
direct me elsewhere if necessary.
Contact the package maintainers - in this case: Pythonware
-aj
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14.01.2009 16:06 Uhr, Bart Spaans wrote:
Hi,
I would like to take over the maintenance of a piece of software
(pyFluidSynth), but we can't seem to find a 'change owner' or 'add
owner' option. Is it possible to change the owner of a certain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
the simplex index also contains stuff belonging to hidden releases.
Is this intentional?
Example (threadframe package):
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/threadframe
The XMLRPC API reveals only one published version: 0.2
The simple index
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Would it take much effort including the creation date of packages (and
their release files) on PyPI?
Andreas
- --
ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: i...@zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25.01.2009 19:20 Uhr, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Would it take much effort including the creation date of packages (and
their release files) on PyPI?
As Tarek says: the creation date is already available from the
changelog
[n]\nTypeError: \'NoneType\' object is unsubscriptable\n'
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards,
Andreas Jung
- ---
ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: i...@zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart
Hi there,
it is known that the latest setuptools version produces broken
packages with SVN 1.6 checkouts. Could we get a fixed setuptools
version asap - fixing this issue is essential
(there is some patch floating around).
Andreas
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. Co.
On 28.04.2009 14:51 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
it is known that the latest setuptools version produces broken
packages with SVN 1.6 checkouts. Could we get a fixed setuptools
version asap - fixing this issue is essential
(there is some patch floating around).
I think you
...which has nothing to do with the topic of this list.
Andreas
Hello alls,
I currently have a problem with creating a multi-dimensional array in
numpy. The following is what I am trying to do and the error message.
test = zeros((3,3,3,3,3,3,10,4,6,2,18,10,11,4,2,2), dtype=float);
On 31.07.09 03:23, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote:
.. must be this:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/softwarefabrica.django.crud/1.0dev-BZR-r79-panta-elasticworld.org-20090316230356-bp41wibodhmypvep
PyPI, the package toilet :-
Andreas
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG
Use rst2html from the docutils package for checking your reST for
errors.
-aj
Am 10.10.09 05:37, schrieb Lukasz Szybalski:
Hello,
Any idea how to test rst so it renders properly. This rst displays
just fine in moinmoin, so is there anything special about Pypi as far
as rendering?
Any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I propose a policy change for packages registered with PyPI:
- packages registered on PyPI have at least one release
- one release of registered package on PyPI _must_ contain
a valid source code distribution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi there,
I propose a policy change for packages registered with PyPI:
- packages registered on PyPI have at least one release
I'm not sure what you mean with release. Every package on
PyPI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
I guess it's better to tell the package authors about your
use of their packages and offer them help in hosting their
packages on more reliable infrastructures.
If that doesn't solve your problem, it's likely better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
What I'm saying is that it's better to contact the package
authors whose entries cause problems than to force some
policy on all PyPI package entries which carelessly puts
packages that are not hosted on PyPI into the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Note however that Andreas' proposal was to require that 'sdists' be
uploaded. I personally won't use binary-only packages, but it has
historically been true that PyPI was intended to support them, as well
as to support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 17 Jun, 2010, at 13:20, Patrick Gerken wrote:
Please have a look at the package in question. The only problem
with it is that the download URL registered on PyPI no longer works.
It redirects to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Note however that Andreas' proposal was to require that 'sdists' be
uploaded. I personally won't use binary-only packages, but it has
historically been true that PyPI was intended
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:20:55 pm Patrick Gerken wrote:
Not putting the source release on pypi is just one indicator of
crappy software.
Yeah, like that infamous example of crappy software, Numpy.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Ramm wrote:
How do you ensure the availability of the index and the packages at
any time?
By keeping our server up, and not depending on pypi. If our server
goes down, packages will become unavailable, but if you want a mirror
for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
In theory yes, in real life no - I approached several package
maintainers in the past due to several reasons..some agree with the
complaints, others just don't care. Some consider PyPI as their own
private repository with
-maintained and reliable
package index. After almost 20 years I am still under the impression
that we are still in the kindergarten.
Deeply frustrated,
Andreas
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi there,
I propose a policy change for packages registered with PyPI:
- packages registered on PyPI have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
the mirror
c.pypi.python.org
moved to a different machine.
Please switch the DNS to
178.77.74.179
The old server will remain available and active until
you switched the DNS.
Thanks,
Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Could someone please care about the DNS switch asap?
Andreas
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi there,
the mirror
c.pypi.python.org
moved to a different machine.
Please switch the DNS to
178.77.74.179
The old server will remain available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Huh?
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyusb/0.4.2
lists an email
and
http://sourceforge.net/users/wander_lairson
has a See me a message link.
In addition: this project has a mailing list.
- -aj
wander.lairson wrote:
Dear all,
I am the PyUSB
packages on
pypi.
yes, this discussion again pypi is a catalog but it should not be a
package dumpster (not related to django in any way).
Regards,
Andreas Jung
--
Sorry for being brief -
sent by iPhone
___
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Is there any interest in running an immutable mirror of PyPI on
python.org as a service to package users?
Aren't the PyPI mirrors (based on top of the pep381 client)
immutable?
Andreas
attachment: lists.vcf___
Martijn Faassen wrote:
On 07/05/2011 04:35 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Is there any interest in running an immutable mirror of PyPI on
python.org as a service to package users?
Aren't the PyPI mirrors (based on top of the pep381 client)
immutable?
You tell me
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I can understand the problem. I'm just telling you that the solution
you propose is an unacceptable interference with the freedom of the
package authors (and this comes from somebody who thinks that a rating
system is *not* an unacceptable interference with that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Krah wrote:
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
original poster's choice to host somewhere else, but it can indeed
be inconvenient to quite a few users of PyPI if a package is not
hosted on PyPI.
I don't see any inconvenience
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 2/6/2012 3:17 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
My point about this: if a person does not want to host its package
on PyPi than it should stay away from PyPI.
The Python Package Index was originally just that: a package
*INDEX
Don't feel offended..I don't care about your module. I am speaking of the
general situation.
-aj
Stefan Krah wrote:
Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
Honestly I am truly pissed of the by arrogance and ignorance of package
maintainers coming with the very same arguments every time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PJ Eby wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com
mailto:li...@zopyx.com wrote:
My point about this: if a person does not want to host its package on
PyPi than it should stay away from PyPI. Package hygiene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Very nice ! If you're willing to keep that page up and running,
I'd love to see a link to that page at pypi.python.org.
If this is considered useful, I think it should be *in* PyPI.
+1
I would also like to receive
Ask the package maintainer.
-aj
sigmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I just want to bring attention to therecord for
PyZenity: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/PyZenity/0.1.4. The links are
broken and should be corrected.
Best regards,
Sigmund Vestergaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This here is weird
c.pypi.python.org Russian Federation
That's my server it it is running in Germany :)
- -aj
ken cochrane wrote:
I have taken your advice and I have updated it so that it is a
little clearer. I changed the times a little
Applications running on top of Pyramid like
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zopyx.smartprintng.server/1.1.1
?
-aj
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 10.04.2012 15:46, schrieb Michael Merickel:
Can we get a new classifier for the Pyramid web framework? Using the
old Pylons classifier is a little
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Why not go to the next level and get the script on this page to
update a DNS load balancer with all green mirrors?
I still think that mirror selection should be on the client side.
First, if you have an infrastructure
The service tells me
DE; State/Province : NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN
-aj
ken cochrane wrote:
Sorry about that, I'm getting the location from http://ipinfodb.com
feel free to update their location for that IP with the correct one.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I assume that the pep381client implementation might need something
like mix-missing packages option.
- -aj
Jonas Baumann wrote:
Hey there,
Last month the pypi mirrors got inconsistent regarding the dists of
the package plone.testing.
On the
ken cochrane wrote:
c.pypi.python.org http://c.pypi.python.org/ and d.pypi.python.org
http://d.pypi.python.org/ are both over 1 day old
Up running again - pep381client was hanging for unknown reasons.
Does it make sense to limit the max. execution time of pep381client.
-aj
attachment:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki
zygmunt.kryni...@canonical.com wrote:
I did not realize that a basic install of plone is composed of
100+ packages. If all of those packages are maintained by a
coherent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
since the switch to https:// I have massive problems running larger
buildouts. After every second or third pulled package I receive a
connection reset by peer error.
Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I appreciate all the work done on making PyPI making more secure.
However this switch has not been tested properly and the current massive
problems cause world wide trouble. Any chance to fix this soon or what
is the way to use http:// only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I'm slowly wrapping up my sprint. Here's what happened today:
- fixed some errors reported by users - allow running a non-deleting
mirror (with the hint that official ones must not do this) - add
config file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I moved my c.pypi.python.org mirror to a new faster machine.
Please update the DNS entry to 176.9.146.29.
This mirror is running on top of Christian Theune's bandersnatch
implementation.
Andrreas
- --
ZOPYX Limited | Python |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will somone change the DNS entry?
Andreas
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi there,
I moved my c.pypi.python.org mirror to a new faster machine.
Please update the DNS entry to 176.9.146.29.
This mirror is running on top of Christian Theune's
57 matches
Mail list logo
