Re: [Catalyst] Re: memory usage of mod_perl process

Just a couple of comments on this topic. If you're using apache2.2 then mod_cache is available. This can be used to cache the result of a request either in memory or disk. Ideal for the situations where you want to cache the front page of your site every minute.

[Catalyst] Template::Provider::DBI and Catalyst

Following up on a recent post to the list concerning templates in the database I'm wondering what the current status of Template::Provider::DBI is and if anyone is using it in production within Catalyst? I just found out that it seems to be incompatible with Catalyst::View::TT::ForceUTF8, for

[Catalyst] Why I chose Perl and Catalyst

Following the discussion late last year about Perl not being selected as the language of choice by those who make the decisions, I thought I should write up my experience (as the CTO who gets to make the decisions) as to why we chose Perl, Catalyst, DBIx::Class for our system platform. I've

Re: [Catalyst] Why I chose Perl and Catalyst

Jon wrote: Following the discussion late last year about Perl not being selected as the language of choice by those who make the decisions, I thought I should write up my experience (as the CTO who gets to make the decisions) as to why we chose Perl, Catalyst, DBIx::Class for our system

RE: [Catalyst] Why I chose Perl and Catalyst

Hi everyone, Do not want to start any kind of language war or anything - just need some concrete, objective opinions and advice. We are starting a brand new web application + services + database project and my boss (those who make the decisions) asked me as project lead why I am chosing the

Re: [Catalyst] Why I chose Perl and Catalyst

Hermida, Leandro wrote: Hi everyone, Do not want to start any kind of language war or anything - just need some concrete, objective opinions and advice. We are starting a brand new web application + services + database project and my boss (those who make the decisions) asked me as project

RE: [Catalyst] Why I chose Perl and Catalyst

--- Hermida, Leandro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, Do not want to start any kind of language war or anything - just need some concrete, objective opinions and advice. We are starting a brand new web application + services + database project and my boss (those who make the

Re: [Catalyst] Using C::P::A::ACL and C::M::FormBuilder together?

On Feb 12, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Troy Davis wrote: Changing from Private to Action allows the forward to work, but now the ACL is no longer enforced (although I can see the rule being loaded in the debug output). This isn't unexpected, the C::P::A::ACL docs say it only works with Private.

Re: [Catalyst] Template::Provider::DBI and Catalyst

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:02:21AM +0100, Tobias Kremer wrote: Following up on a recent post to the list concerning templates in the database I'm wondering what the current status of Template::Provider::DBI is and if anyone is using it in production within Catalyst? I just found out that it

Re: [Catalyst] Why I chose Perl and Catalyst

Any insight or advice as to why would one prefer a Perl stack over a Java or .NET one? For me, one of Perl's big wins, particularly in an enterprise situation, is testing. Test::More is still the easiest-to-use testing framework I've experienced. Adding tests is easy, automating tests is easy,

[Catalyst] Re: Redirect status codes (was: HTTP redirect - delayed Firefox)

* Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-12 11:45]: On 10 Feb 2007, at 08:30, A. Pagaltzis wrote: Actually, 302 means “repeat the same request at this other URI” whereas 303 means “please retrieve this other URI using GET.” The difference is that strictly according to RFC, 302 means the

Re: [Catalyst] Why I chose Perl and Catalyst

Let me start by saying that I've led projects with both Java / Struts / etc. and Perl / Catalyst, what follows is based on my experience with both. I have no experience with .Net, so can't comment there, though I suspect some of the Java points, especially those related to support and black

Re: [Catalyst] Why I chose Perl and Catalyst

On 14/02/07, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following the discussion late last year about Perl not being selected as the language of choice by those who make the decisions, I thought I should write up my experience (as the CTO who gets to make the decisions) as to why we chose Perl, Catalyst,

Re: [Catalyst] C::C::FormBuilder - Forwarding to another action overwrites data from the calling action

On 2/12/07, Danny Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks to me that forwarding from one Form action to another Form action causes the FormBuilder data from the first action to be overwritten. Can you confirm this, or am I doing something wrong here? I am still somewhat green with

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Redirect status codes (was: HTTP redirect - delayed Firefox)

--- A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-12 11:45]: On 10 Feb 2007, at 08:30, A. Pagaltzis wrote: Actually, 302 means “repeat the same request at this other URI” whereas 303 means “please retrieve this other URI using GET.” The

[Catalyst] Re: Why I chose Perl and Catalyst

* Hermida, Leandro [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-13 15:35]: It seems that a lot of people (including my boss) think that Perl cannot compete when one is trying to do enterprise applications. In some ways (please tell me if I am wrong) it might be true because Perl exhibits very few rules and