Thanks Matt,
Yes, I believe that is the reason why we have to go with FastCGI
in Catalyst Apps. At least, as a starter, I am able to see a substantial
exec time increase with CGI over FastCGI. So I guess I will stick
with FastCGI.
Thanks
Dister.
On 5/7/07, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apologies in advance if this is the wrong place to ask this.
Trying to compile the latest dev release of the authentication plugin
(0._01) and it's failing on tests:
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e
test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:43:31AM -0700, Balaji Srinivasan wrote:
Rather than the two approaches above, I think a better one was to add a new
validation type to the FormBuilder VALIDATE array.
$CGI::FormBuilder::Field::VALIDATE{FOOFIELD} = '/^[^,]{6,40}$/';
Now in all
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:22:43PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:43:31AM -0700, Balaji Srinivasan wrote:
Rather than the two approaches above, I think a better one was to add a
new
validation type to the FormBuilder VALIDATE array.
Is this feature planned for the next release ?
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:05:20PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
Is this feature planned for the next release ?
I'm not sure the 'feature' is really well-defined enough yet to call it
such.
It's going to take somebody with a requirement for something along these
lines to spike the work and see what
Please tell me how could i implement that without making the interface a
complete app ?
2007/5/8, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:58:16PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
I can test the part related to the subject of this thread with great
pleasure.
I'm currently making
Hi There.
Yes. Tests are a bit borked at the moment.
Jay
On May 14, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Jamie Neil wrote:
Apologies in advance if this is the wrong place to ask this.
Trying to compile the latest dev release of the authentication
plugin (0._01) and it's failing on tests:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:46:59PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
2007/5/8, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:58:16PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote:
I can test the part related to the subject of this thread with great
pleasure.
I'm currently making full-featured dynamic
I'm studying different frameworks for a new project.
I'm very new to Catalyst and am reading through the tutorial.
In part 8, advanced CRUD, there's an example of form validation.
The approach is very similar to what I've always used
but I've been looking at Rails recently and noticed that they
mla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/14/2007 02:45:49 PM:
I'm studying different frameworks for a new project.
I'm very new to Catalyst and am reading through the tutorial.
In part 8, advanced CRUD, there's an example of form validation.
The approach is very similar to what I've always
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/14/2007 02:45:49 PM:
I'm studying different frameworks for a new project.
I'm very new to Catalyst and am reading through the tutorial.
In part 8, advanced CRUD, there's an example of form validation.
The approach is very similar to
If this is the wrong list, please direct me to the right place. I'm trying
to get Catalyst working under apache/mod_perl (works fine with the
standalone server).
Basically, I have a very simple app called Registration. In apache I set it
up like:
Location /registration
SetHandler perl-script
On May 14, 2007, at 5:09 PM, John Goulah wrote:
If this is the wrong list, please direct me to the right place.
I'm trying to get Catalyst working under apache/mod_perl (works
fine with the standalone server).
Basically, I have a very simple app called Registration. In apache
I set it
mla wrote:
Clearly Catalyst has an opinion on how to handle the request
with Catalyst::Request. I'm sure you could override that somehow and
use your own, but it's helpful that there's a default request
interface that new developers can get up to speed quickly with.
I don't see why that can't
On Mon, 14 May 2007, mla wrote:
Anyone have validation logic in the model and are happy with it?
There are two kinds of validation here. One is model-level validation, and
yes, it's in my model code. My model throws exceptions, which I trap in
the controller and mess with to make it work
Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, mla wrote:
Anyone have validation logic in the model and are happy with it?
There are two kinds of validation here. One is model-level validation,
and yes, it's in my model code. My model throws exceptions, which I trap
in the controller and mess
Thanks, I'm using apache 2.2.3 -- That setup does sound much more logical,
and here is what I have to match the example:
-
PerlSwitches -I/var/www/registration/lib
PerlModule Registration
VirtualHost *
ServerName myhostname
DocumentRoot /var/www/registration/root
Location /
On Mon, 14 May 2007, mla wrote:
There are two kinds of validation here. One is model-level validation, and
yes, it's in my model code. My model throws exceptions, which I trap in the
controller and mess with to make it work for the web UI.
The controller might also do some validation, but
Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, mla wrote:
Could you give an example of how you munge the exceptions into error
messages for the user?
eval
{
$user-update( %bunch_of_stuff );
};
if ( my $e = Exception::Class-caught(
'My::App::Exception::DataValidation') )
{
#
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:44:41PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, mla wrote:
Anyone have validation logic in the model and are happy with it?
There are two kinds of validation here. One is model-level validation, and
yes, it's in my model code. My model throws exceptions,
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 06:48:01PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
I've had several people contact me with possible patches for C::V::Mason
(and for others), but my response of I don't know Mason well enough, please
can you post to the list for info has been ignored every single time.
Please can
I just finished getting the tutorial project working.
The thing I'm not clear on is this separation between lib/MyAppDB/
and lib/MyApp/Model/
The tutorial says:
With Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema you essentially end up with two sets
of model classes (only one of which you write... the other
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Bill Moseley wrote:
There are two kinds of validation here. One is model-level validation, and
yes, it's in my model code. My model throws exceptions, which I trap in
the controller and mess with to make it work for the web UI.
I tend to have much less validation in the
Bill Moseley wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:44:41PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, mla wrote:
Anyone have validation logic in the model and are happy with it?
There are two kinds of validation here. One is model-level validation, and
yes, it's in my model code. My model
Hi
A couple of Login/authentication questions:
As expected, when using frames, when a session times out and displays the
Login page, it does so in the frame that is the target for that request.
Is there any easy trick to be able to get that Login screen to use '_top' as
the target? perhaps an
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:42:00PM -0700, mla wrote:
Which is why I like the form validation tools to not be specific to
the web/HTML side of things. The HTML side of the forms are easy, anyway,
and often require hand-customizing. That way the same forms can be
used for more than just the
27 matches
Mail list logo