Re: [Catalyst] Plugins vs. Base Controllers

Matt S Trout wrote: [..] If your only argument is I need $c you can usually do a controller, view or model with an ACCEPT_CONTEXT method. Often you only actually need the app instance (i.e. the MyApp class name in 5.70) not the full request context. Could someone point me example (some

Re: [Catalyst] Plugins vs. Base Controllers

- Original Message From: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 7:18:33 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Plugins vs. Base Controllers Matt S Trout wrote: [..] If your only argument is I need

Re: [Catalyst] [announce] Catalyst 5.70 developer release.

Marcus Ramberg wrote: On 6/26/06, *Marcus Ramberg* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey gang. I've just pushed Catalyst 5.70_01 to CPAN. You can check it out here: [..] http://search.cpan.org/src/MRAMBERG/Catalyst-Runtime-5.70_01/Changes Sorry about the mixup.

[Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

What is the reason for using Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump instead? eloy -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo:

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: What is the reason for using Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump instead? erm I mean ... for droppig Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump eloy -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej