Re: [Catalyst] FastCGI is Weak Sauce

2006-06-29 Thread Matt S Trout
A. Pagaltzis wrote: Hi all, this was written about Rails apps, but all the conceptual points are 100% applicable to Catalyst: The Web Is a Pipe http://duncandavidson.com/essay/2006/06/webaspipe I’m not as sure about the practical points. In particular, I have no idea what

Re: [Catalyst] FastCGI is Weak Sauce

2006-06-29 Thread Mark Blythe
So we should just run the myapp_server.pl script instead of FCGI. It speaks HTTP!! Joking... only joking... On 6/29/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A. Pagaltzis wrote: Hi all, this was written about Rails apps, but all the conceptual points are 100% applicable to Catalyst:

Re: [Catalyst] FastCGI is Weak Sauce

2006-06-29 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-29 23:20]: If I'm reading it correctly, he's upset that the protocol between web servers and FastCGI isn't HTTP. He doesn't make a very good case for why, but that seems to be the gist. Yes. I take his argument as being that FastCGI has the

Re: [Catalyst] FastCGI is Weak Sauce

2006-06-29 Thread Matt S Trout
A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-29 23:20]: If I'm reading it correctly, he's upset that the protocol between web servers and FastCGI isn't HTTP. He doesn't make a very good case for why, but that seems to be the gist. Yes. I take his argument as being that

Re: [Catalyst] FastCGI is Weak Sauce

2006-06-29 Thread Perrin Harkins
A. Pagaltzis wrote: Yes. I take his argument as being that FastCGI has the application running in a separate process that can’t be communicated with in absence of a webserver because there aren’t any utilities that speak FastCGI directly, and if the connection between the webserver and the