Just a couple of comments on this topic.
If you're using apache2.2 then mod_cache is available. This can be used to
cache the result of a request either in memory or disk. Ideal for the
situations where you want to cache the front page of your site every minute.
Jeffrey Ng wrote:
so are you saying in general catalyst is pretty heavy, and its not for site
with many concurrent users?...
No, not at all. It all depends on what your application does, how many web
screens, how many peak concurrent users and equivalent requests/second, how
many discrete users,
Are you hitting the database very hard? Complex joins? Are your pages
very complex?
No, it's a fairly simple backend processor that mostly handles XML
transactions for a Flash frontend. There are some XHTML admin pages
generated with Template::Toolkit (and so are slower) but they are rarely
hit.
On 2/9/07, Peter Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you hitting the database very hard? Complex joins? Are your pages
very complex?
No, it's a fairly simple backend processor that mostly handles XML
transactions for a Flash frontend. There are some XHTML admin pages
generated with
On 2/9/07, Oliver Gorwits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Ng wrote:
I am the coworker of Fayland who posted the topic memory usage of
mod_perl process.
Our company has invested quite some time on migrating our perl code to
catalyst (more than half year of time by 7 programmers). However,
On 2/9/07, Jeffrey Ng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's the result on a live server:
total used free sharedbuffers
cached
Mem: 415097226540161496956 0
275481313344
-/+ buffers/cache:13131242837848
Swap: 8385912
On Fri February 9 2007 12:53 pm, Jeffrey Ng wrote:
On 2/9/07, Oliver Gorwits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Ng wrote:
I am the coworker of Fayland who posted the topic memory usage of
mod_perl process.
Our company has invested quite some time on migrating our perl code to
Tony Losey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/09/2007 04:05:17 PM:
On Fri February 9 2007 12:53 pm, Jeffrey Ng wrote:
On 2/9/07, Oliver Gorwits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Ng wrote:
I am the coworker of Fayland who posted the topic memory usage of
mod_perl process.
Our
On 2/10/07, Tony Losey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri February 9 2007 12:53 pm, Jeffrey Ng wrote:
On 2/9/07, Oliver Gorwits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Ng wrote:
I am the coworker of Fayland who posted the topic memory usage of
mod_perl process.
Our company has invested
I am the coworker of Fayland who posted the topic memory usage of mod_perl
process.
Our company has invested quite some time on migrating our perl code to
catalyst (more than half year of time by 7 programmers). However, I am
starting to worry that moving to catalyst is causing too much overhead
On 2/8/07, Jeffrey Ng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have read practical mod_perl. I tried to preload many of our modules in
startup.pl. But the shared memory value doesnt change at all. Also, doesnt
5.7M shared memory usage sound too small comparing to the 92.6M total size?
You're not looking at
Jeffrey Ng wrote:
I am the coworker of Fayland who posted the topic memory usage of
mod_perl process.
Our company has invested quite some time on migrating our perl code to
catalyst (more than half year of time by 7 programmers). However, I am
starting to worry that moving to catalyst is
On 2/9/07, Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/8/07, Jeffrey Ng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have read practical mod_perl. I tried to preload many of our modules
in
startup.pl. But the shared memory value doesnt change at all. Also,
doesnt
5.7M shared memory usage sound too small
Jeffrey Ng wrote:
I am the coworker of Fayland who posted the topic memory usage of
mod_perl process.
Our company has invested quite some time on migrating our perl code to
catalyst (more than half year of time by 7 programmers). However, I am
starting to worry that moving to catalyst is
On 2/8/07, Jeffrey Ng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when i run this free test, should i run it on the live server, or on a
test server with single process apache mode?
I wouldn't mess with things on your live server, but you want to run
in normal mode, not single-process.
here's the result on a
There are a lot of good tuning tips in the Apache docs, as Perrin says.
I presume you've tried things like using a lightweight front end proxy (to
serve images/static files) and building a custom backend mod_perl Apache
that includes *only* the modules you need. If you use the stock
Fedora/Redhat
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:37:24PM -, Peter Edwards wrote:
For comparison, I'm using DBIx::Class across 15 tables and a really simple
hand-rolled MVC (not Cat) for a medium volume site. It gives 'top' lines
like:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
21495
17 matches
Mail list logo
