On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:16:52AM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:19:30PM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
Still completely broken.
Read half a dozen plugins' setup methods and come back when you have a
clue.
I'm not sharing the dunce's cap though, you can get your own made.
You want to be careful with those things ... they can have nasty side
effects apparently :
Well, one of the more mystical things Duns accepted was the wearing
of conical hats to increase learning. He noted that wizards
Quinn Weaver wrote:
On Mon Jun 18 20:04:09 GMT 2007, Matt Trout wrote:
No it isn't. The redefine means it -isn't- called a second time.
Yes it is. You can verify this by running myapp_server.pl under the debugger,
or by putting lines like this in MyApp::setup:
warn setup called
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:50:30AM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
Quinn Weaver wrote:
On Mon Jun 18 20:04:09 GMT 2007, Matt Trout wrote:
No it isn't. The redefine means it -isn't- called a second time.
Yes it is. You can verify this by running myapp_server.pl under the
debugger,
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:50:30AM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
What's wrong with:
$_-setup for keys %{$self-_plugins};
Setup order matters.
Fine, the order is known in setup(), but gets discarded.
$class-setup_plugins($flags-{plugins});
...
# Call plugins'
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:50:30AM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
What's wrong with:
$_-setup for keys %{$self-_plugins};
Setup order matters.
Fine, the order is known in setup(), but
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:50:30AM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
What's wrong with:
$_-setup for keys %{$self-_plugins};
Setup order matters.
Fine,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:49:45PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
Read half a dozen plugins' setup methods and come back when you have a clue.
Ouch! No need to be like that was there?
--
Chisel Wright
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: http://www.herlpacker.co.uk/
I wrote a todo list; Now I can
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:19:30PM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:50:30AM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
What's wrong with:
$_-setup for keys
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:19:30PM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:50:30AM +0100, Matt Lawrence wrote:
What's wrong with:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 07:02:42PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
I'd be fairly willing to say this is a bug and it should be doing
{
no strict 'refs';
no warnings 'redefine';
local *{${appclass}::setup} = sub { shift-NEXT::setup(@_); };
local *setup = sub {};
$app-setup;
Hi, all,
During some debugging, I noticed that MyApp::setup is called twice.
This looks like an intentional feature. My question is, why?
From MyApp.pm:
my $ret = $self-SUPER::setup( @_ );
From Catalyst.pm:
# Call plugins setup
{
no warnings qw/redefine/;
local
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:50:06AM -0700, Quinn Weaver wrote:
Hi, all,
During some debugging, I noticed that MyApp::setup is called twice.
This looks like an intentional feature. My question is, why?
From MyApp.pm:
my $ret = $self-SUPER::setup( @_ );
From Catalyst.pm:
#
On Mon Jun 18 20:04:09 GMT 2007, Matt Trout wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:50:06AM -0700, Quinn Weaver wrote:
Hi, all,
During some debugging, I noticed that MyApp::setup is called twice.
This looks like an intentional feature. My question is, why?
From MyApp.pm:
my $ret =
14 matches
Mail list logo
