Re: [Catalyst] Apache2::RequestIO::read problem

2008-07-29 Thread Bill Moseley
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:07:31AM -0500, Chris Dolan wrote: [error] Caught exception in engine Apache2::RequestIO::read: (104) Connection reset by peer at /home/foo/perl/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/ Catalyst/Engine/Apache.pm line 187 [Mon Jul 28 16:14:36 2008] [error] [client

Re: [Catalyst] Apache2::RequestIO::read problem

2008-07-29 Thread Andrew Rodland
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 12:07:31 am Chris Dolan wrote: [error] Caught exception in engine Apache2::RequestIO::read: (104) Connection reset by peer at /home/foo/perl/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/ Catalyst/Engine/Apache.pm line 187 [Mon Jul 28 16:14:36 2008] [error] [client xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] File

Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst

2008-07-29 Thread Matt S Trout
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 09:36:44PM -0700, John Beppu wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:27:27AM -0700, John Beppu wrote: Imagine if you could install a blog, a wiki, a forum, or a store just as easily. Yeah,

Re: [Catalyst] Duplicate entries with C::P::Session::Store::DBIC and MySQL

2008-07-29 Thread Tobias Kremer
Quoting Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 01:03:52PM +0200, Tobias Kremer wrote: Is there anything speaking against wrapping line 52 of the DBIC backend class with an eval to trap this duplicate error and ignore it silently (or just warn about it) except the fact that

Re: [Catalyst] Duplicate entries with C::P::Session::Store::DBIC and MySQL

2008-07-29 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On 29 Jul 2008, at 12:30, Tobias Kremer wrote: The short time window between the find() and create() calls of the find_or_create() method indeed is the problem. It sounds like this window should be too small to ever happen but in reality it happens very often in our (and other's)

Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst

2008-07-29 Thread Daniel McBrearty
my 0.05 (possibly a bit OT) : I looked previously at a few ways of adding forums etc to the site using 3rd party code, indeed there are many possibilites (some perl, some not) The thing that was always a sticker for me was getting some kind of logical integration, ie: 1. letting users keep

Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst

2008-07-29 Thread Chisel Wright
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:21:10PM +0200, Daniel McBrearty wrote: 1. letting users keep existing member and login creds 2. being able to cross ref to other parts of the site eg. for a certain node, easily have a discussion link, and the reverse link from the forum If you ever think of a good

Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst

2008-07-29 Thread Daniel McBrearty
I've been meaning to dig into the everything2 code (which powers perlmonks I think, amongst other things ..) and see how they do the cross ref stuff. They seem to have a pretty nice node abstraction which is the core of the problem, I think. the membership stuff relies on a common API, I guess.

Re: [Catalyst] Duplicate entries with C::P::Session::Store::DBIC and MySQL

2008-07-29 Thread Daniel Westermann-Clark
On 2008-07-28 22:33:44 +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: Is there anything speaking against wrapping line 52 of the DBIC backend class with an eval to trap this duplicate error and ignore it silently (or just warn about it) except the fact that it's trying to fix something that probably should be

Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst

2008-07-29 Thread John Beppu
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Daniel McBrearty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my 0.05 (possibly a bit OT) : Off-topic or not, I think these are interesting and valid questions. I looked previously at a few ways of adding forums etc to the site using 3rd party code, indeed there are many