Re: [Catalyst] Credential::HTTP vs. Controller::REST

2007-11-10 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm working with the REST action/controller to expose my app to browsers and to any remote client (json/xml, etc). For the browser stuff, I just use the regular Auth plugins with a database store tied to a user/pass login form. For remote

Re: [Catalyst] [OT] ASP.NET MVC

2007-12-11 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear MS: Welcome to the party. http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ASPNET35ExtensionsPlusMVCHowToScreencast.aspx Interesting to see another take on MVC inside some bastion of ASP.NET. -=Chris Looks like they are using a routing system to

Re: [Catalyst] [OT] ASP.NET MVC

2007-12-12 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 09:18 +0200, Octavian Rasnita wrote: Hi, I haven't read anywhere that : Local is deprecated, and I use it very often. Why is it deprecated? I found it works very well, and it is the most simple solution.

Re: [Catalyst] Input/Parameter Checks

2007-12-13 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- Mesdaq, Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone have some suggestions or references to good modules or best practices in this regards? This is mainly in regards to using these inputs in sql queries or other areas where common attacks against web applications happen. I wonder in the

Re: [Catalyst] [OT] ASP.NET MVC

2007-12-17 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:31:21AM -0800, John Napiorkowski wrote: Yeah, the main configuration is definitely the right place to be maintain centralized routing and to more cleanly separate the URI namespace. Just that as you say, it's

Re: [Catalyst] [RFC] Loading Plugins from lib/MyApp/Plugins

2007-12-18 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- Bogdan Lucaciu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 18 December 2007 04:39:36 Christopher Laco wrote: I know I've been down this thread before. When writing a framework that generates customized Catalyst apps, it would be a whole lot easier (well, more proper) to add plugins in

Re: [Catalyst] [RFC] Loading Plugins from lib/MyApp/Plugins

2007-12-18 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Napiorkowski wrote: --- Bogdan Lucaciu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 18 December 2007 04:39:36 Christopher Laco wrote: I know I've been down this thread before. When writing a framework that generates customized Catalyst

Re: [Catalyst] Status of Reaction - ready for new projects?

2008-01-01 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- Barry Hoggard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm starting on a new catalyst project and wondering if I should start out with Reaction. Is there a website or repository I can check out? I didn't see one on the catalyst wiki. -- Barry Hoggard Barry, You might want to say hello on the

[Catalyst] Let's port Twitter to Perl

2008-05-05 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey, I heard Twitter was abandoning RoR. It would be the coup of the year if we could bring them to Perl, but from what I understand it's not even on the consideration list. So why not give them a little help? We should have a hackathon to port Twitter to Catalyst using all our most

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Let's port Twitter to Perl

2008-05-05 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- On Mon, 5/5/08, Aristotle Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Aristotle Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Catalyst] Re: Let's port Twitter to Perl To: catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Date: Monday, May 5, 2008, 1:07 PM * John Napiorkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-05 16:45]: I

[Catalyst] Changes to the behavior of $c-namespace in 5.7013

2008-05-19 Thread John Napiorkowski
. I'd just like to clarify this is the behavior we want and see if we can cook up a test for it. Is this giving anyone else trouble? Sincerely, John Napiorkowski ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin

Re: [Catalyst] How to build a catalyst system based on plug in ?

2008-05-22 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- On Wed, 5/21/08, Solli Honorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Solli Honorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Catalyst] How to build a catalyst system based on plug in ? To: catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2008, 11:54 PM Hi, I'm thinking about to build one system to

Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst

2008-07-30 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- On Wed, 7/30/08, Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 7:02 AM On 30 Jul 2008, at 02:27, John Beppu wrote:

Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst

2008-07-30 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- On Wed, 7/30/08, Bruce Keeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Bruce Keeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 3:38 PM Daniel McBrearty wrote: The usual way to

Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst

2008-08-01 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- On Fri, 8/1/08, Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Squatting::On::Catalyst To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Date: Friday, August 1, 2008, 2:57 AM * On Tue, Jul 29 2008, John Beppu

Re: [Catalyst] Announce: Instant AJAX web front-end for DBIx::Class

2008-08-19 Thread John Napiorkowski
be done once we have DBIC on Moose and we can do even more introspection. John Napiorkowski ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com

Re: [Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst Runtime 5.80001

2009-04-18 Thread John Napiorkowski
Tremendous thanks and am looking forward to 5.9 :) --John Napiorkowski --- On Sat, 4/18/09, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote: From: Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net Subject: [Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst Runtime 5.80001 To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk

Re: [Catalyst] how to reuse Catalyst Schema for non-web purposes?

2009-04-22 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, kakim...@tpg.com.au kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote: From: kakim...@tpg.com.au kakim...@tpg.com.au Subject: Re: [Catalyst] how to reuse Catalyst Schema for non-web purposes? To: Simon Wilcox sim...@digitalcraftsmen.net Cc: The elegant MVC web framework

[Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage

2009-04-23 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hi, I'm seeking feedback on: http://dev.catalystframework.org/wiki/releaseannouncements And in particular my first swing at something we can use as a press release and send to all the usual suspect (Slashdot, Digg, etc):

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage

2009-04-23 Thread John Napiorkowski
:56 AM On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 08:46:29AM -0700, John Napiorkowski wrote: And in particular my first swing at something we can use as a press release and send to all the usual suspect (Slashdot, Digg, etc): http://dev.catalystframework.org/wiki/releaseannouncements/58pressrelease Most

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage

2009-04-23 Thread John Napiorkowski
: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com To: catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 6:46 PM Subject: [Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage Hi, I'm seeking feedback on: http://dev.catalystframework.org/wiki/releaseannouncements

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage

2009-04-23 Thread John Napiorkowski
:34 PM On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:19:50AM -0700, John Napiorkowski wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by tl;dr too long, didn't read.  Big blocks of text.  You could probably split each of those paragraphs up so that people's eyes don't get lost in the middle. Moose Object Development

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage

2009-04-23 Thread John Napiorkowski
, 2009, 3:53 PM 2009/4/23 John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com: Changes made to the wiki, hopefully it's closer.  Would be great to get some more details in responses, such as more particular words or sentences we don't feel is right. Great job John! I think it is very good but here

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage

2009-04-23 Thread John Napiorkowski
, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:03 PM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks these are great additions.  I modified the wiki page with these and a few other tweaks I got from reviewing several other press releases Lastest at: http://dev.catalystframework.org/wiki/releaseannouncements

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage

2009-04-24 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- On Fri, 4/24/09, Jesse Sheidlower jes...@panix.com wrote: From: Jesse Sheidlower jes...@panix.com Subject: Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Date: Friday, April 24, 2009, 9:55 AM On Fri, Apr

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage

2009-04-26 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- On Sun, 4/26/09, Kieren Diment kie...@diment.org wrote: From: Kieren Diment kie...@diment.org Subject: Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Date: Sunday, April 26, 2009, 5:23 AM On 26/04/2009,

[Catalyst] Final RFC for Press Release!

2009-04-28 Thread John Napiorkowski
There's a new edit of the Catalyst press release, which was graciously donated by a copy edit expert mst found for us. mst++ Please take a look: http://dev.catalystframework.org/wiki/releaseannouncements/58pressrelease.edit Now, there's a lot of changes and it's much shorter. Basically, the

Re: [Catalyst] Final RFC for Press Release!

2009-04-28 Thread John Napiorkowski
[snip...] Perhaps we should add something similar to our press releases: - About Catalyst Catalyst is a framework for building web applications of all sizes. It allows clean separation of all the components and embodies most current best practices. Developed and

Re: [Catalyst] best practice: where to put constants

2009-06-04 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- On Thu, 6/4/09, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote: From: Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net Subject: Re: [Catalyst] best practice: where to put constants To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Date: Thursday, June 4, 2009, 11:31 AM Jarom Smith wrote: In

Re: [Catalyst] Themes, skins, templates and componentized UI?

2009-07-06 Thread John Napiorkowski
- Original Message From: Gunnar Strand gunnarstr...@yahoo.com To: catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 3:55:27 PM Subject: [Catalyst] Themes, skins, templates and componentized UI? Hi, I am a little new in the web design area. I'm trying to design an application

Re: [Catalyst] New Apress book on Safari Books Online

2009-07-23 Thread John Napiorkowski
- Original Message From: Ali M. tclwarr...@gmail.com To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:42:44 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] New Apress book on Safari Books Online If I may I recommend the Ebook, you will receive it

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: no make install on catalyst apps

2009-08-02 Thread John Napiorkowski
- Original Message From: Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:28:08 PM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] RFC: no make install on catalyst apps On 28 Jul 2009, at 14:14, Marcus Ramberg wrote: I

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: no make install on catalyst apps

2009-08-02 Thread John Napiorkowski
- Original Message From: Zbigniew Lukasiak zzb...@gmail.com To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Sunday, August 2, 2009 1:42:14 PM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] RFC: no make install on catalyst apps On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, John Napiorkowskiwrote:

Re: [Catalyst] XSD Validation of Forms

2009-08-10 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- On Thu, 8/6/09, Alejandro Imass alejandro.im...@gmail.com wrote: From: Alejandro Imass alejandro.im...@gmail.com Subject: [Catalyst] XSD Validation of Forms To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Date: Thursday, August 6, 2009, 12:15 PM I did something cool these

Re: [Catalyst] XSD Validation of Forms

2009-08-12 Thread John Napiorkowski
- Original Message From: Chris hutchinson.ch...@gmail.com To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 8:36:22 PM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] XSD Validation of Forms My comment was perhaps more oriented to using a common declarative

Re: [Catalyst] Picking template type based on input

2010-03-26 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Fri, March 26, 2010 9:15:47 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Picking template type based on input On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote: The controller asks

Re: [Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst-Runtime-5.89002-TRIAL PSGI Catalyst - third development release

2011-08-08 Thread John Napiorkowski
- Original Message - From: Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net To: Pedro Melo m...@simplicidade.org Cc: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2011 10:47 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst-Runtime-5.89002-TRIAL PSGI Catalyst

Re: [Catalyst] Tutorial woes.

2011-08-10 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: Roderick A. Anderson raand...@cyber-office.net To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:06 PM Subject: [Catalyst] Tutorial woes. I can't find where my error is while doing the tutorial. I make it all the way to end of 06 Authorization

Re: [Catalyst] Can the latest Catalyst version from CPAN be installed under Windows?

2011-09-08 Thread John Napiorkowski
I'd really love to see some logs of this problem.  I am on MacOSX and don't have problems of this magnitude when installing Catalyst.  However I don't use the built in system Perl, I use Perlbrew + local::lib + cpanm as my primary build toolchain.  If I use a modern Perl (5.12+) the only things

Re: [Catalyst] Can the latest Catalyst version from CPAN be installed under Windows?

2011-09-09 Thread John Napiorkowski
, On 8/09/11 at 6:21 PM -0700, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: 2) Create and activate a local::lib where you dependencies will go (in other words never install stuff into the perlbrew managed Perl) What is the reason for not installing into perlbrew managed libs? I've got perlbrew setup

Re: [Catalyst] Can the latest Catalyst version from CPAN be installed under Windows?

2011-09-09 Thread John Napiorkowski
- Original Message - From: Matthias Dietrich mdietr...@cpan.org To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Cc: Sent: Friday, September 9, 2011 6:55 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Can the latest Catalyst version from CPAN be installed under Windows? Erm... 

Re: [Catalyst] Can the latest Catalyst version from CPAN be installed under Windows?

2011-09-09 Thread John Napiorkowski
does often cause trouble.  Good luck! John - john romkey http://www.romkey.com/ On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:21 PM, John Napiorkowski wrote: I'd really love to see some logs of this problem.  I am on MacOSX and don't have problems of this magnitude when installing Catalyst.  However I don't use

Re: [Catalyst] Can the latest Catalyst version from CPAN be installedunder Windows?

2011-09-12 Thread John Napiorkowski
- Original Message - From: Octavian Rasnita octavian.rasn...@ssifbroker.ro To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com; The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Cc: Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 2:47 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Can the latest Catalyst version from

Re: [Catalyst] Team development and module management

2011-12-05 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 10:41 AM Subject: [Catalyst] Team development and module management We are slowly replacing a large legacy monolithic application

[Catalyst] RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT: 5.90011

2012-03-08 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hello Everyone! I'm pleased to announce the lastest point release for the Catalyst project.   This release closes up a few bugs, including the bug that prevented Catalyst from properly recognizing dist.ini as a development project root file.  Here's the full list: Bug fixes:   - Simplification

Re: [Catalyst] Application Testing, Mocking Apache Headers/Environment

2012-04-15 Thread John Napiorkowski
John, Could you give us a bit more information? For example do you have a test case you are trying to write, but can't? I'll a little confused as to what you are trying to do and maybe seeing more code would help. Oh, and Just FYI the newer versions of Catalyst move the env access from

Re: [Catalyst] Best practice for configuration file placement

2012-05-16 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: Luis Muñoz luisemu...@gmail.com To: catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 5:45 PM Subject: [Catalyst] Best practice for configuration file placement Hi there, I've failed in locating this question as a FAQ, so I would appreciate

[Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst-Runtime 5.90013

2012-06-21 Thread John Napiorkowski
to the that of the development release previously noted. Thanks! John Napiorkowski (jnap) 5.90013 - 2012-06-21 10:40:00   - Release previous TRIAL as stable.   - We failed to note in the previous changelog that the Makefile.PL has been improved to make it easier for authors to bootstrap a developer install

[Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst-Runtime 5.90014

2012-06-26 Thread John Napiorkowski
, but it is our intention to find a way later on to finish this clean up in such a way as we don't break older code.  If you are not suffering from the above bug, this is not a required update for you.  Full changes follows. Thanks! hobbs++ for moving this forward. John Napiorkowski 5.90014 - 2012-06

[Catalyst] Community Poll!

2012-07-26 Thread John Napiorkowski
://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2012/07/announcing-catalyst-community-poll-and-upcoming-town-hall.html Thanks! John Napiorkowski ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive

[Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst-Runtime 5.90016

2012-08-16 Thread John Napiorkowski
The latest point release of your favorite web development platform is out on CPAN! https://metacpan.org/release/JJNAPIORK/Catalyst-Runtime-5.90016 This is a bugfix release that makes a few tweaks to the way parameters are prepared and makes some Catalyst methods a bit smarter when

Re: [Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst-Runtime 5.90016

2012-08-17 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com; The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:23 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst-Runtime 5.90016 Thanks for the new

Re: [Catalyst] DBIx::HA

2012-08-28 Thread John Napiorkowski
For what it's worth, when I was working on multi database / replication support for DBIC, I looked at DBIx::HA and a bunch of other things and nothing really did the job.  We ended up building master-slave replication into DBIC for mysql.  I think it would not be very hard to update that code

Re: [Catalyst] Better Testing

2012-10-02 Thread John Napiorkowski
Bill, Generally I use a mix of stuff.  I use Test::DBIx::Class for database domain logic testing, and some of the psgi and mechanize test stuff for testing http interaction.  When I have a stand alone class, I typically use Test::Most In the past I used Test::Class and I found that it tends to

[Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst-Runtime version 5.90018

2012-10-24 Thread John Napiorkowski
I'm pleased to announce Catalyst version 5.90018!  This release solves pointless test failures when installing Catalyst due to recent changes in HTTP::Message. You may not consider this a mandatory upgrade unless this issue is biting you. Thanks! John Napiorkowski

[Catalyst] Its time for Advent again

2012-11-16 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey everyone, Here's a copy of a blog post I did announcing calls for advent articles: = So last year wasn't the most spectacular Perl Catalyst Advent we've ever had.   Lets see if we can do better this go around!  In order to assist, here's a few thoughts on simple articles you can do:    

Re: [Catalyst] Its time for Advent again

2012-12-03 Thread John Napiorkowski
today and I will copy stuff over the the github repo, so you can take a look over there and make sure I got it right! John From: Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com; The elegant MVC web framework catalyst

[Catalyst] Advent 2012 is launched!

2012-12-06 Thread John Napiorkowski
Just FYI, If you have a moment to reblog (http://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2012/12/catalyst-advent-2012-is-live.html) or tweat the calendar, etc. everything helps! http://www.catalystframework.org/calendar John___ List:

Re: [Catalyst] Advent 2012 -- Catalyst in Nine Steps -- Kudos to Octavian

2012-12-29 Thread John Napiorkowski
Octavian++ indeed! From: John Karr brain...@brainbuz.org To: 'The elegant MVC web framework' catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk; orasn...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2012 9:06 PM Subject: [Catalyst] Advent 2012 -- Catalyst in Nine Steps -- Kudos to Octavian

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Advent 2012 -- Catalyst in Nine Steps -- Kudos to Octavian

2012-12-29 Thread John Napiorkowski
I'd really like to see a project to gather up, modernize and peer review all the best / informative Advent articles of years past, and we could gather it together as an open source project on github (similarly to the way the Modern Perl book is done).  Crafting an ebook would be

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Advent 2012 -- Catalyst in Nine Steps -- Kudos toOctavian

2012-12-30 Thread John Napiorkowski
- Original Message - From: Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com; The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Cc: Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2012 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Re: Advent 2012 -- Catalyst in Nine Steps

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Advent 2012 -- Catalyst in Nine Steps -- Kudos toOctavian

2013-01-02 Thread John Napiorkowski
and authorization stuff for example). John - Original Message - From: Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com; The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Cc: Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 8:01 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Re: Advent

[Catalyst] Advent wrap-up blog and next steps

2013-01-11 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey All, I did a quick blog on Advent 2012, which you can review here (http://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2013/01/catalyst-advent-wrap-up-and-thoughts.html). In particular be sure to check out any of the late published entries, as well as review the list of great articles of

Re: [Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst-Runtime 5.90020

2013-02-28 Thread John Napiorkowski
: The Catalyst team is proud to announce the latest version of Catalyst::Runtime. John Napiorkowski wrote a great blog post [1] about its new features and asks for your comments and suggestions for upcoming features. |  ||! Catalyst::Action now defines 'match_captures' so it is no long

[Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

2013-03-01 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey All, http://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2013/03/catalyst-backup-for-next-release-on-play-perl.html This is over on play Perl (http://play-perl.org/player/jnap) for your comments and votes.  Hope to see you there! John ___ List:

Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

2013-03-04 Thread John Napiorkowski
@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Sunday, March 3, 2013 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: Hey All, http://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2013/03/catalyst-backup-for-next

Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

2013-03-04 Thread John Napiorkowski
- Original Message - From: Luis E. Muñoz luisemu...@gmail.com To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com; The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Cc: Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 11:38 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release On Mar 4

Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

2013-03-05 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com; The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 12:39 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

Re: [Catalyst] ActionClass('RenderView') questions

2013-03-05 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: E R pc88m...@gmail.com To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 9:46 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] ActionClass('RenderView') questions On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Tomas Doran

Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

2013-03-05 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com Cc: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 10:42 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

[Catalyst] Catalyst Github Organization and information about the next targeted release goals

2013-03-06 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey All, I've written a blog summarizing information about development of Catalyst 'zombie-boomstick', the next targeted release of Catalyst, which you can read over here: http://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2013/03/catalyst-zombie-boomstick-branch-on-github-for-your-coding-fun.html

Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

2013-03-11 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 11:48 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Will

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst web site

2013-05-13 Thread John Napiorkowski
Sorry I didn't pick this up a while back.  I have been thinking about how to jumpstart the website, but right now I feel like the limited dev resources would be better used to do bugs and feature development.  At some point I think we should all figure out how to have a smaller website with

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Chained and exceptions

2013-05-13 Thread John Napiorkowski
I'm happy to see this in SicilianButtercup, sounds straightup. I can't do it myself, I think rounding out issues with the async support is going to take all the rest of my time this dev cycle.  Anyone want to step up?   You can do this is the shadowcat repo or on github at :

Re: [Catalyst] /Depreci?ate/ message

2013-05-23 Thread John Napiorkowski
speeling error noted! thanks!  -john - Original Message - From: Toby Corkindale t...@dryft.net To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Cc: Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:52 AM Subject: [Catalyst] /Depreci?ate/ message I noticed that the recent Catalyst

[Catalyst] Update on current development cycle for Catalyst

2013-05-31 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey All, I just released a blog regarding my thoughts on the status of the current Catalyst development cycle.  You can see it over here: http://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2013/05/catalyst-sicilian-buttercup-update.html Hope to see many of you at YAPC for a meetup and Catalyt

[Catalyst] Attending YAPC? Shout out if you can get together Tuesday to hack on Catalyst!

2013-06-03 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey all, I'm at YAPC in Austin, having an awesome time and hoping some (or many) or you want to get together Tuesday afternoon/evening to talk and hack about / on Catalyst!  Shout out on the list of you can show up (I'll try to sync activities on IRC as well so for those of you that can't be

Re: [Catalyst] List of Applications using Catalyst

2013-06-11 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: Richard Bychowski bychow...@gmail.com To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com; The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 2:45 PM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] List of Applications using Catalyst On Jun 10, 2013, at 7:50 AM, John Napiorkowski

[Catalyst] New Catalyst Release on CPAN!

2013-06-12 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey All, Today we released 'SicilianButtercup' the most recent version of Catalyst to CPAN!  I've blogged more details over here: http://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2013/06/new-catalyst-release-on-cpan-support-for-websockets-event-loops-and-more.html#.Ubj7Hxaf_0c But the quick

Re: [Catalyst] unicode warnings (+ errors C::P::UploadProgress)

2013-06-14 Thread John Napiorkowski
Yup this is a regression! We have a patch in HEAD and it should go out later today. Sorry for the trouble ( but at least I know who's upgrading) John Sent from my iPhone On Jun 14, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Brad Bowman l...@bereft.net wrote: On 14/06/13 14:39, Alan Humphrey wrote: I just upgraded

Re: [Catalyst] unicode warnings (+ errors C::P::UploadProgress)

2013-06-15 Thread John Napiorkowski
the new default is to not encode (so as to not break apps like yours , bill!) John Sent from my iPhone On Jun 14, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:29 AM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: Yup this is a regression! We have a patch

[Catalyst] Any bug reports or issues with maint release 5.90042?

2013-06-18 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey All, You might have noticed we've had a few bug fix releases of Catalyst to fix regressions introduced in v5.90040.  CPAN testers is reporting more than 100 test passes with no failures for the latest release.  Regressions in the previous releases were mostly issues with missing

[Catalyst] Brain dump of possible tasks for Catalyst Development

2013-07-03 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey all, I'd like for this upcoming development cycle to spend a little more time upfront discussion all the different ideas I know floating around for where Catalyst is going over the time.  When we did the poll last year, many people said the top thing preventing them from contributing was

[Catalyst] Final proposals for the summer development cycle

2013-07-17 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey All, I just released a blog with my thoughts on the final proposals for what we'd like to target for the next Catalyst development cycle, as a followup to Sicilian-Buttercup.  Take a look when you can and comment as you think!

[Catalyst] Catalyst 'Hambug development branch open for contributions

2013-07-24 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hello All, I'm pleased to announce we've opened the new catalyst development branch, Hamburg, for contributions.  I've blogged previously and most recently about this here:

Re: [Catalyst] New design

2013-07-25 Thread John Napiorkowski
Mark, Thanks for sharing this and for spearheading the effort! I think its a nice design, although as a few others mentioned perhaps it would be idea to not have the astronauts dancing, as that might step on the Dancer people toes a bit.   My bigger concern for the website is overall long

[Catalyst] Catalyst 'Hamburg' development release 001 on cpan

2013-07-28 Thread John Napiorkowski
on irc.perl.org#catalyst-dev Good day, and happy Catalyst hacking! John Napiorkowski ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk

[Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-08 Thread John Napiorkowski
Hey All, I had a bit of time on a few plane rides recent to get a chance to write down all the various thoughts and ideas I've heard around what could be a minimally useful expansion of how Catalyst handles content types beyond classic form data, etc as well as some features to make it easier

Re: [Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-09 Thread John Napiorkowski
On Friday, August 9, 2013 12:00 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:27 PM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: https://github.com/perl-catalyst/CatalystX-Proposals-REStandContentNegotiation   I currently extend HTTP::Body in a similar way that you

Re: [Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-09 Thread John Napiorkowski
On Friday, August 9, 2013 4:52 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:11 PM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: What's the use case you have in mind?  Something like first check for something like 'application/vnd.mycompany.user+json' and then fall

Re: [Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-12 Thread John Napiorkowski
well.  Thoughts? jnap On Friday, August 9, 2013 5:38 PM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: On Friday, August 9, 2013 4:52 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:11 PM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: What's the use

Re: [Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-12 Thread John Napiorkowski
On Monday, August 12, 2013 2:33 PM, Alexander Hartmaier alexander.hartma...@t-systems.at wrote: On 2013-08-12 16:58, John Napiorkowski wrote: Hey Bill (and the rest of you lurkers!) I just updated the spec over at https://github.com/perl-catalyst/CatalystX-Proposals

Re: [Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-12 Thread John Napiorkowski
! John Regards, Marius On 12 August 2013 22:26, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2013 2:33 PM, Alexander Hartmaier alexander.hartma...@t-systems.at wrote: On 2013-08-12 16:58, John Napiorkowski wrote:   Hey Bill (and the rest of you lurkers

Re: [Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-12 Thread John Napiorkowski
On Monday, August 12, 2013 5:56 PM, Alexander Hartmaier alexander.hartma...@t-systems.at wrote: On 2013-08-12 22:26, John Napiorkowski wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2013 2:33 PM, Alexander Hartmaier alexander.hartma...@t-systems.at wrote: On 2013-08-12 16:58, John Napiorkowski

Re: [Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-13 Thread John Napiorkowski
make it any easier / simpler, I can't see it  getting much simpler than the few lines of code I already have, can it? Or am I doing something wrong? Cheers, Craig Chant. -Original Message- From: John Napiorkowski [mailto:jjn1...@yahoo.com] Sent: 12 August 2013 21:27

Re: [Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-13 Thread John Napiorkowski
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 12:42 PM, Alexander Hartmaier alexander.hartma...@t-systems.at wrote: On 2013-08-13 17:37, John Napiorkowski wrote: Craig, Great points and thanks for the code example (I wish more stuff like this was floating around in Catalyst oriented blogs, etc

Re: [Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-14 Thread John Napiorkowski
On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 5:53 AM, Will Crawford billcrawford1...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 August 2013 16:37, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: [...] The main issue that I see is that we have too many ways to do exactly the same thing (return JSON for AJAX endpoints

Re: [Catalyst] More detailed proposal for changes related to content negotiation and REST

2013-08-14 Thread John Napiorkowski
On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:15 AM, Will Crawford billcrawford1...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 August 2013 10:53, Will Crawford billcrawford1...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Also, making it easier to restore a session id after deserialising a request. I was asked to implement an API that

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst starter template

2013-08-19 Thread John Napiorkowski
Ynon, Yeah, the skeleton builder is showing its age a bit.  I personally never use it, but I see the need for something like this. I've come to the conclusion that 'one starter to rule them all' isn't going to be very forward looking no matter what it looks like.  I was pondering something

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst starter template

2013-08-20 Thread John Napiorkowski
From: Gianrossi, Paolo paolino.gianro...@gmail.com To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 7:37 AM Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst starter template Isn't this something along the lines of 

  1   2   3   >