On 20/09/2006, at 7:41 PM, Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
And of course it looks nice :-)
IMHO not :).
Comments please.
IMHO the other proposal (http://svarog.homeip.net/cayenne/) looks a
little better,
and even the original design is not bad at all :).
If I would have to vote I would say to keep
Fonts:
nice, easy to read
Colors:
Aside from the link colors, I think they're good. I'm afraid I don't
have a suggestion as to how the links should appear.
Menu:
The structure is logical: it's easy to find what you're looking for.
All in all, could do with a bit of refining, but otherwise good
All in all, pretty good. I do have some criticisms though:
o Fonts are way too small. I realize the size is relative to the user's
browser settings, but they shouldn't be set to small for normal reading.
o I think the term Bug Tracker is a bit too limiting. It is used to
track new
If I would have to vote I would say to keep the original look.
That's it? You have nothing at all constructive to say? You have no
ideas on how to improve the site?
IMHO the actual site is pretty good. There are many other areas regarding
Cayenne that need improvement.
Do you know the
On Sep 20, 2006, at 3:24, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
This article is a posting I made regarding our issues with EOF:
http://lists.apple.com/archives/Webobjects-dev/2006/Jul/msg00743.html
I did a quick test here in our live qa-system running cayenne-1.2,
tapestry-3.0.1, jtds-1.1, java-5 and MS SQL
On Sep 20, 2006, at 2:10 PM, Borut Bolčina wrote:
1. The fact that Cayenne is undergoing a process for Apache family is
not nearly as important to be the first thing a user sees on the
front page.
As Kevin stated, this can easily suggest the immaturity of the
framework.
This is a
Yeah, incubation is a bad time for the project when things look weird
all around. Here is the branding guide that defines these rules (see
Disclaimers)
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
But let's not focus on that - the disclaimer is there temporarily.
Hopefully we'll be
Hi all,
I would like to use the PostgreSQL interval type in Cayenne.
Do I need to create a custom type? If so, are there any gotchas?
tia,
arturo
