In short: is there a command-line or API-driven way of creating a
cayenne configuration by pointing at an existing schema or is the
modeler the only supported approach? Cgen should be OK for generating
the classes, but I'm interested in an earlier step - generating the XML
configuration
_
The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop search!
http://join.msn.com/toolbar/overview
There are probably more elegant solutions, but here is a simple one -
package all XML files in appName.jar.
Andrus
On Apr 4, 2006, at 4:47 PM, WONDER wrote:
Well the Structure looks like
AppName
+META-INF
+WEB-INF
+
On 4/4/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everything in Cayenne can be assembled via API. So you'd go about
assembling Cayenne stack in the following order:
* create DefaultConfiguration
* add DataDomain
* add DataNode
* add DataMap (using org.objectstyle.cayenne.access.DbLoader
Hi
I am a newbie to Cayenne but I have been developing with WebObjects for a
few years and though I would try something open source. I have been reading
a few articles on getting the DataContext namely this one
http://www.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAYDOC/Web+Applications but it
On Apr 4, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
You don't want to use something like this c:/myPath/Cayenne.xml
because it won't work when you go to deploy your application on an
application server.
Yep. That'll be asking for trouble.
I've never used J2EE packaging of WO apps, so I am
I agree with you, I am trying to do many stuff at once.
And this should work. particularly that the application using own framework
runs in Eclipse and on WO Server.
I belive 50% the problems on deploying an application is something not
found.
about appName.jar, Yes I am sure, I see the path in
Unlike WO key-value coding, Java standard convention (called
JavaBeans) is to use the getXyz for an accessor method of a logical
property xyz. All the Expression classes (and endless other Java
libraries) follow this convention, so I'd strongly recommend not to
modify the getters. You'll
