On May 18, 2006, at 6:54 AM, Tomi NA wrote:
I have a couple of questions about this.
First, is there any special reason the templates, the DataObject and
the ObjectId class don't have a serialVersionUID?
We should probably add serialVersionUID to all serializable classes
(and somehow add
Hi Andrus,
thanks a lot for the quick answer!
Indeed, it seems that I sent the wrong configuration. I will check this
issue tomorrow...
But, would you say it make sense to declare a default domain in
cayenne.xml, in order to get a domain with getDomain() although you have
configured more than
On May 18, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Thilko Richter wrote:
But, would you say it make sense to declare a default domain in
cayenne.xml, in order to get a domain with getDomain() although you
have
configured more than one? Unfortunatly I am not so familar with
Cayenne
concepts ;-)
Cayenne domain
I could see that potentially causing confusion. In some of my apps, I have
about 7 DataDomains. I explicitly request the one I want to use based upon the
workflow of the application. To me, this leads to less magic when debugging
and reading the source code.
Of course, you could always
Here's an odd error that I've hit for the first time:
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: invalid schema name: ENG_WORK_MGMT
in statement [SELECT DISTINCT t0.ACTIVITY_YEAR, t0.BUDGET_CODE, t0.GL,
t0.IS_ACTIVE, t0.NAME, t0.OBJ_TYPE, t0.SUB_ACTIVITY, t0.WORK_ORDER,
t0.ACTIVITY, t0.ID, t0.WORK_TYPE
On 5/18/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tough one. What DB is that, Oracle? Can you run this query from sqlplus?
I'm testing it with HSQLDB. It'll be production on Oracle. On
Oracle, I could cheat in this particular case and set up a login
that accesses both schemas.
I could
On May 18, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
But the root problem seems to be that Cayenne should probably not be
doing a join this way. There's no guarantee that two DataNodes are
running on the same database type, much less in the same database.
Maybe it should be changing the
On 5/18/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my first-pass at solving the problem at the application level
Cleaned up version that can go in the Base DataObject class.
protected List getToManyRelationshipTheHardWay(String
targetPrimaryKey, String joinTable, String
On 5/18/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, things can be simplified in case of relationships (i.e.
qualifiers matching a single object). A generic solution that works
with an arbitrary qualifier will be substantially more involved.
Yeah, I just hit that problem in a
Simplified version: I have a parent table and a child table, where the
child table has a parent_id column and a status column. I change the
status in one of the child records and commit the change. Later, I ask
for the child records for the given parent record, but the child record
that I
10 matches
Mail list logo