Hi,
Is a DVTI really required on the ezvpn client , and should it be referenced
under 'crypto ipsec client' using virtual-interface 1 ? I noticed that even
without it, it works.
This is what i have on my client:
crypto ipsec client ezvpn ez connect auto group ezvpn key cisco local-address
Yes you need it. It will add a route for you automatically
With regards
Kings
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Deepak N depp3...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Is a DVTI really required on the ezvpn client , and should it be
referenced under 'crypto ipsec client' using virtual-interface 1 ? I
it is required only if you do not want to add static route to reach the remote
network , if DVTI was there the route will be added automatically
rehards
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:58:25 +0800
From: depp3...@yahoo.com
To: ccie_security@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] DVTI on
Thanks Kings..so should i give ip unnumbered and tunnel mode for the client
dvti ?
--- On Sun, 10/6/12, Kingsley Charles kingsley.char...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Kingsley Charles kingsley.char...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] DVTI on Ezvpn Client
To: Deepak N depp3...@yahoo.com
Just have tunnel mode ipsec configured.
With regards
Kings
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Deepak N depp3...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Kings..so should i give ip unnumbered and tunnel mode for the
client dvti ?
--- On *Sun, 10/6/12, Kingsley Charles kingsley.char...@gmail.com*wrote:
Hi Mike
I made a sigh of relief realizing that's it's not myself who thinks similar
way. I've made numerous exercises and every time I hope that the question is
more or less specific on how to do it. For me the main catch is that Virtual
HTTP and Telnet require an additional IP address if
I configured ezvpn without DVTI a while ago for a number of routers to our
client when DVTI was not so popular. Still works like a charm. Of course the
router needs a default static route and normally you'd have one in real life
situation, i.e. ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Fa0/1
Eugene
From:
Hello Kings,
Thanks, but as Eugene stated, is not which feature to use rather than what to
allow on the trigger ACL, for example on the router, I can use a trigger ACL on
the interface to catch the traffic to be authenticated, if No ACLs applied that
would be Easy cake, but on the ASA? I mean
It's more of a rhetoric question. I'm a little bit disappointed by the fact
that ASA and IOS developers are not on the same page when defining ports for
RADIUS.
When you ask the router about it it knows only knew ports:
R3#sh ip port-map | in radius
Default mapping: radius udp
And it's not only for RADIUS.
Syslog over TCP has different ports defined in IOS port-map and ASA.
R3(config)#do sh ip port-map | in syslog
Default mapping: syslog udp port 514
system defined
Default mapping: syslog-conn tcp port 601
Folks,
Is there any good of defining user based port mapping? Let's say I want to
create a mapping for a non-standard port, for example telnet - 3020.
I'd go:
ip port-map user-telnet-3020 port tcp 3020
In my opionion this would be an empty container for an IOS because it wouldn't
associate a
Absolutely confusing ;)
I'd say it doesn't make any difference.
From: ccie_security-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_security-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mike Rojas
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 3:04 PM
To: ccie_security@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] CIR
I am not sure if I am getting you.
ACS listens on all the required ports. If Asa is initiating traffic then
ACS will know how to handle it.
Only time there can be a problem is when there is another firewall in the
form of Asa or IOS(cbac/zone based fw) between the Asa and the ACS.
In this case you
How would I dig it around, guys ?
I have three routers in DMVPN cloud. They established full connectivity and
adjacency in the so-called Phase 2 (all traffic goes via the Hub router).
I configured ip nhrp redirect and ip nhrp shortcut on all tunnel interfaces
but the traffic between two spokes
14 matches
Mail list logo
