Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Rekey address

2012-06-13 Thread waleed '
how you checked that re key messages still recieved on GM's ?? Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:00:46 +0800 From: depp3...@yahoo.com To: ccie_security@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Rekey address What is the significance of the 'address ipv4 x.x.x.x' in the gdoi group

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Rekey address

2012-06-13 Thread Deepak N
Sorry , i was wrong,  apparently the GM's are not receiving the rekey requests from the KS :(So what needs to be done on the asa context to get the rekey messages from the KS to the GM? gm1#sh crypto gdoi gm rekey Group GET (Multicast)    Number of Rekeys received (cumulative)       : 0   

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] AAA Servers

2012-06-13 Thread Eugene Pefti
Hi Deepak, We just recently discussed it here that if you have CBAC/ZFW in the path of TACACS traffic and your dutifully included TACACS for inspection it will still not work because TCP port 49 is not allowed by PAM. Eugene From: ccie_security-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Lab at RTP

2012-06-13 Thread Johan Bornman
Airport details I don't see on the Cisco site, that the reason for my question. I am from South-Africa, the airport details is not so obvious as you make it to be. Now I also know google:-) -Original Message- From: Matt Hill [mailto:mayd...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 June 2012 08:25 AM To:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Rekey address

2012-06-13 Thread Fawad Khan
Asa will not pass multicast in a multiconext mode. GRE tunnel will be needed between the routers to handle the multicast rekeying if needed. On Wednesday, June 13, 2012, Eugene Pefti wrote: Then it matches to what Cisco guide says about address ipv4 x.x.x.x. You'd need it only for unicast

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Lab at RTP

2012-06-13 Thread Johan Bornman
Thanks, Joe. Much appreciated. On 13 Jun 2012, at 15:43, Joe Astorino joeastorino1...@gmail.com wrote: I had a good experience with the Wingate hotel. They provided a shuttle to/from the lab as well. On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Johan Bornman jo...@isc.co.za wrote: Thanks.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Lab at RTP

2012-06-13 Thread Joe Astorino
No problem. I know a lot of other CCIEs and CCIE candidates have been happy there as well. When you give them a call to book your room, mention that you are there to take your CCIE lab exam at Cisco. They should have a shuttle to and from the lab, and they will also pick you up at the airport

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Rekey address

2012-06-13 Thread Mike Rojas
Nope, a Server address is not needed when configuring GET, I guess Kings already responded to this. Ill look for his e-mail Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:48:08 -0400 From: fawa...@gmail.com To: eug...@koiossystems.com CC: ccie_security@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Rekey

[OSL | CCIE_Security] TACACS attributes missing in Cisco docs ?

2012-06-13 Thread Eugene Pefti
Guys, Am I missing something? It is a notorious question about role-based access and CLI views but my point is about finding the required details in Cisco docs. I need the right TACACS attributes for cli-view. Assuming that I forgot the it is cli-view-name I navigate to following sections hoping

[OSL | CCIE_Security] Do you know what would be cool? [Slightly off topic]

2012-06-13 Thread Matt Hill
If a training vendor could make a VM that plays on WMWare, Virtual Box or similar that had a whole security topology on it. ie everything good to go, just press play and your topology is there. So Vendor X says, this VM needs your favourite OS running on a box with xxGB RAM and off you go. I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] TACACS attributes missing in Cisco docs ?

2012-06-13 Thread Fawad Khan
Try show aaa attribute On Wednesday, June 13, 2012, Eugene Pefti wrote: Guys, Am I missing something? It is a notorious question about role-based access and CLI views but my point is about finding the required details in Cisco docs. I need the right TACACS attributes for

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Do you know what would be cool? [Slightly off topic]

2012-06-13 Thread Steve Di Bias
Agreed. Count me in. On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Matt Hill mayd...@gmail.com wrote: If a training vendor could make a VM that plays on WMWare, Virtual Box or similar that had a whole security topology on it. ie everything good to go, just press play and your topology is there. So

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Rekey address

2012-06-13 Thread Kingsley Charles
Mike, we need an address for multicast as I observed that the GMs didn't accept the rekeys, if there address is different. On safer side always configure address for both modes. With regards Kngs On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Mike Rojas mike_c...@hotmail.com wrote: Nope, a Server address

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Rekey address

2012-06-13 Thread Mike Rojas
Yeah, but I was referring to the KS server ipv4 address.. I agree without the Multicast address rekey is not gonna work... in fact is going to tell you that the configuration is incomplete. Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:07:37 +0530 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Rekey address From:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] TACACS attributes missing in Cisco docs ?

2012-06-13 Thread Eugene Pefti
Thanks, Fawad, I remember looking into it but somehow I skipped the right name in the long list. Let me get it right. This command outputs all available and known to IOS attributes or only those returned by RADIUS ? If it's only RADIUS and I guess it by the only available prompt: R6#sh aaa

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] TACACS attributes missing in Cisco docs ?

2012-06-13 Thread Fawad Khan
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t14/feature/guide/gt_laas.html Check this link, it confirms our understanding. On Wednesday, June 13, 2012, Eugene Pefti wrote: Thanks, Fawad, I remember looking into it but somehow I skipped the right name in the long list. Let me