correctly.
Good luck!
Herman
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Kyriacos
Petratos
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 6:25 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Scaling with SCALA high and low resolution data sets
Dear All,
we have two
XDS had run correctly.
Good luck!
Herman
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Kyriacos
Petratos
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 6:25 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Scaling with SCALA high and low resolution data sets
Dear
bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Kyriacos Petratos
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 6:25 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Scaling with SCALA high and low resolution data sets
Dear All,
we have two data sets at about 0.9 and 1.9 Ang. resolution collected
Dear All,
we have two data sets at about 0.9 and 1.9 Ang. resolution collected from a
single crystal.
Integration with iMosflm seems to be fine like the scaling within each of
the data sets.
When we try to merge and scale both of them with 'Scala' we get extremely
high scale factors for the
On 03/20/13 13:25, Kyriacos Petratos wrote:
Dear All,
we have two data sets at about 0.9 and 1.9 Ang. resolution collected
from a single crystal.
Integration with iMosflm seems to be fine like the scaling within each
of the data sets.
When we try to merge and scale both of them with 'Scala'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Kyriacos,
as David has pointed out different indexing possibilites might be a
problem. Could you run the mtz-files from mosflm through pointless
(and then aimless instead of scala)? pointless compares the different
indexing possibilities and
