Hi
I'd just process it in iMosflm, and run the Quickscale task after integration.
With almost no effort you should get a rapid visual indicator (in the graphs
produced by Scala) of the discontinuities between the wedges.
If the discontinuities are too big, then you might encounter some items
On 03/31/11 18:08, Patrick Loll wrote:
We've just collected a number of inverse beam data sets. It turns out the
crystals showed little radiation damage, so we have a lot of data: 2 x 360 deg
for each crystal, broken up into 30 deg wedges. The collection order went like
this: 0-30 deg,
We've just collected a number of inverse beam data sets. It turns out the
crystals showed little radiation damage, so we have a lot of data: 2 x 360 deg
for each crystal, broken up into 30 deg wedges. The collection order went like
this: 0-30 deg, 180-210, 30-60, 210-240, etc.
Now, assuming no
Pat,
at least give it a try with the one sweep approach.
We have collected plenty of 360deg data sets on a Rigaku system which requires
two omega sweeps at phi 0 and 180 deg. These data sets are for in-house
phasing. We haven't seen big issues with running XDS over these images as one
