Dear All,
Any solution to this problem.
I am also encountering this issue with MacOS, managed to revert back
from the latest CCP4 update and it is working fine.
Thanks.
Jobi
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:42 AM, David Waterman wrote:
> Dear Oliver,
>
> Thanks for digging deeper.
Dear CCP4BB users,
I have a question about Mosflm. The manual says green predictions have
"reflection width greater than 5 degrees" and will not be integrated. I
always
assumed it should have something to do with Lorentz factor but not quite
sure.
Why is it so? I'm not aware of such geometrical
Hi Gerard,
EDS has made the life of many structural biologist easier (and some
crystallographers harder) by providing maps at a time when reading reflection
files from the PDB was still a total nightmare and real-space scores when it
still was a such a hassle to calculate them. I don’t know
Ave atque vale.
The EDS was hugely useful (and will continue to be so in its new manifestation,
we hope)—thanks to everyone who made it happen!
Pat
> On 13 Dec 2016, at 12:51 PM, Gerard DVD Kleywegt
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After tirelessly serving the scientific
Hi all,
After tirelessly serving the scientific community with (mostly) beautiful maps
for two decades, the Uppsala Electron Density Server (EDS;
http://eds.bmc.uu.se/) is now reaching the end of its life (in fact, it has
been living on borrowed time for several years already). Some time in
Overall this board is relatively spam/scam free. I think most users can figure
out what is a legitimate post vs. something malicious. I doubt restricting
post with pdf attachments will make a big difference. There was a time when
any attachment was discouraged but that seems to have fallen
I thought the whole /point/ of the BB is to educate on human
gullibility. Admittedly on a slightly different topic, but apparently
it's effective. Hurrah.
On 13/12/2016 14:13, Ian Tickle wrote:
Clicking a link to a bogus PDF would have the same effect as clicking
the PDF itself, i.e. the
Clicking a link to a bogus PDF would have the same effect as clicking the
PDF itself, i.e. the goal is to get you to what's made up to look like a
login page for Googledocs or whatever, but actually steals your login
details. So although it's true that blocking PDFs would stop this
particular
Any attachment can contain malicious code, so just blocking pdf’s won’t solve
the problem. Maybe the bulletin board administrators could look into a good
virus-scanner to get rid this kind of emails.
However, so far gentle reminders by board members kept this bulletin board
remarkably free of
Project:
We will use a multidisciplinary approach to develop Nanobodies against murine
norovirus, including bioinformatics, X-ray crystallography, molecular biology
techniques, cell culture, and an animal model. To this end we will prepare the
Nanobodies for preclinical trials.
Nanobodies are
Better.
Article requests can always be dealt with off list, unless they're open
access, in which case providing a link would be a better option for
publishers, authors and uninterested recipients.
I think it's a win-win scenario.
On 13 December 2016 at 13:35, Paul Emsley
Project:
We will use a multidisciplinary approach to develop Nanobodies against murine
norovirus, including bioinformatics, X-ray crystallography, molecular biology
techniques, cell culture, and an animal model. To this end we will prepare the
Nanobodies for preclinical trials.
Nanobodies are
Would this mailing list be better or worse if mails with pdfs were blocked?
Dear CCP4,
Could you please forward the following position to suitable candidates.
Application must go through the following website, the closing date is
the 9th of January.
https://uio.easycruit.com/vacancy/preview/4652201a9d62f4804df76cde9facf361/1753239/70932
best regards Preben
Centre
14 matches
Mail list logo