[ccp4bb] Ample, shelxe-beta and F to I conversion confusion

2013-01-28 Thread Huw Jenkins
Hi, I've been running Ample and I'm a bit confused about the input for the shelxe-beta auto-tracing. The input mtz for Ample has F, SIGF and FreeR and it appears that Ample converts the structure factor amplitudes to intensities using mtz2various with the FSQUARED keyword as the log file

Re: [ccp4bb] Ample, shelxe-beta and F to I conversion confusion

2013-01-28 Thread George Sheldrick
Dear Huw, It looks as though you have correctly diagnosed a problem with AMPLE. For expansion from borderline partial structures, I recommend the latest SHELXE (on my beta-test server since Jan. 20th) and experimenting with the -O and -F switches, e.g. -F0.9 -O100 -a30 However SHELXE is

Re: [ccp4bb] Ample, shelxe-beta and F to I conversion confusion

2013-01-28 Thread ronan . keegan
Of Huw Jenkins Sent: 28 January 2013 10:14 To: ccp4bb Subject: [ccp4bb] Ample, shelxe-beta and F to I conversion confusion Hi, I've been running Ample and I'm a bit confused about the input for the shelxe-beta auto-tracing. The input mtz for Ample has F, SIGF and FreeR and it appears that Ample

Re: [ccp4bb] Ample, shelxe-beta and F to I conversion confusion

2013-01-28 Thread George Sheldrick
Correct, shelxe does not use the free -R flags, and works just as well with the original unmerged unctruncated intensities. George Hi Ronan, On 28 Jan 2013, at 12:18, ronan.kee...@stfc.ac.uk wrote: Well spotted! We originally gave structure factors to SHELXE in our testing as for most of