From: Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So sprach =BBDenis Pelletier=AB am 2001-11-27 um 12:23:45 -0500 :
The magic is called pam. I doubt that it's exclusive to Mandrake.
Oh, pam does that? Didn't know that, because I didn't care about it :)
You're right, pam certainly isn't anything
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 28 08:56:53 2001
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Danilo Godec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Danilo Godec wrote:
I got it... /etc/default/cdrecord is the location now...
It never was at a different place.
Sure it was. And it is
Zitat von Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mmmm PAM is Pluggable Authentication Mudule and is a Sun invention
for Solaris from around 1990.
Yes, I know.
I simply didn't know that PAM does do that. Thanks anyhow.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (de)
From: Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So sprach =BBSam Halliday=AB am 2001-11-27 um 16:49:31 + :
which device must i allow them to use in order that this scheduler can be=
=20
utilised in cdrecord, and thus preventing buffer underruns under certain=
=20
circumstances?
I have the same
Zitat von Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dont install cdrecord SIGD, and (more iportant) dont tell people to
do so
Why not? What's so bad about cdrecord being SGID?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (de) http://quote.6x.to (en)
Homepage:
but is it still ok for me to install cdrecord normally (not superuser id'd)
and allow priveledged users the ownership of the relevant /dev/sg devices?
i thought that was the safest option ... then anyone can run cdrecord, but
they get a priveledges error if they do anythign they arnt
On 28-Nov-01 Sam Halliday wrote:
but is it still ok for me to install cdrecord normally (not superuser id'd)
and allow priveledged users the ownership of the relevant /dev/sg devices?
It would also be ok to only set suid (i.e. chmod 47xx) without setting sgid
(set group id) as I understand
From: Karl-Heinz Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just out of curiosity:
find / -perm +1000 on your system does produce not even *one* file?
How do you run your xserver?
1) you dont really mean 1000 which is the sticky bit?
2) find / -perm +onum is not a valid find command line
If your
On 28-Nov-01 Joerg Schilling wrote:
find / -perm +1000 on your system does produce not even *one* file?
1) you dont really mean 1000 which is the sticky bit?
I used the plus meaning this value or higher i.e. including suid and sgid
2) find / -perm +onum is not a valid find command line
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 28 17:38:11 2001
On 28-Nov-01 Joerg Schilling wrote:
find / -perm +1000 on your system does produce not even *one* file?
1) you dont really mean 1000 which is the sticky bit?
I used the plus meaning this value or higher i.e. including suid and sgid
There is
I am looking at getting a Pioneer DVD-R A03 to supplement our CD-R
drive. It will be used on a Linux storage, serving other computers. I
have had very good success with cdrecord/mkiosfs on a Linux system and a
Yamaha SCSI cd-r drive.
I can't find any information about why I should get
Karl-Heinz Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You most likely meant 'find / -perm -4000 -ls'
I did mean:
find / -perm +4000 -ls
and it does work with +1000 just as well -- seems I've no sticky bits set but
lots of suid bits and some with suid and sgid bits which a -4000 does not
catch
yeah, i did have an input from jorg's find, it was relativly small, only a
few lines, mostly password and Xserver stuff... i never knew they ran suid,
you learn somethign every day.
i set the /dev/sg devices to be group owned by cdwriter simply because it is
a scsi emulation.. its an atapi
ProDVD version can be obtained only speaking with Joerg. You may want to
try my (free) version of dvd support from
http://www.abcpages.com/~mache/cdrecord-dvd.html.
For DVD+RW take a look at http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/
mache
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Karl Bellve wrote:
I am looking
14 matches
Mail list logo
