Well, it seemed like a good idea to sort of follow-up on my previous message,
so here it is.
Unlikely what Andy seemed to think, I really wasn't asking this list for
kenrel support. I was actually trying to find out if anyone else was having
the same problem. That problem is under ide-cd
The first drive identified itself as Generic 2.15 and the second
drive identified itself as Optorite DVD RW DD0203 2.11.
Might be same OEM, meaning that they might be sharing firmware [and
consequently firmware bugs]. It's a djungle out there...
I have
located a firmware update for the
From: Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yesterday I bought a DVD+R media (brand Creation). It burned
and plays without any errors or warnings. Does it mean DVD+R
are less problematic than DVD-R in combi burners?
This statement doesn't hold *universally* true, but DVD+ is less
problematic in
From: Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
This is a patch that allows to set a different realtime priority for
cdrecord.
Is usefull if other realtime processes are running.
Not needed.sorry
Jörg
--
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 13 17:47:36 2003
I have tried the ProDVD version and I got Alarm Clock...
The key in the README is the same as the one I use with
/cdrecord-prodvd-2.01a11-i586-pc-linux-gnu
This (alpha) binary is not yet one year old so it should work.
Do you have a wall clock
On Monday 15 December 2003 06:00, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Did you try cdrecord-ProDVD?
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/
Jörg
I haven't used this program for a long time. But I will update my
installation and test it tonight.
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:59:24PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 13 17:47:36 2003
I have tried the ProDVD version and I got Alarm Clock...
The key in the README is the same as the one I use with
/cdrecord-prodvd-2.01a11-i586-pc-linux-gnu
This (alpha) binary
I have improved the DVD patch to cdrecord. It should be able to format
and burn DVD+RW media (altough I have only one DVD+RW blank media to
test, and surely have done incomplete tests).
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/files/cdrtools/index.html
You can find binary packages either in the
Looks like you dont have DMA :-(
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 0.4x. Requestor's computer (which
was described in originating post) should perform over 2x without DMA.
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 1 to 2 CPU spikes per second,
but as high load all the time. The comment is
From: Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like you dont have DMA :-(
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 0.4x. Requestor's computer (which
was described in originating post) should perform over 2x without DMA.
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 1 to 2 CPU spikes per second,
but as
Looks like you dont have DMA :-(
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 0.4x. Requestor's computer (which
was described in originating post) should perform over 2x without DMA.
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 1 to 2 CPU spikes per second,
but as high load all the time. The
From: Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like you dont have DMA :-(
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 0.4x. Requestor's computer (which
was described in originating post) should perform over 2x without DMA.
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 1 to 2 CPU spikes per second,
but
Hello,
I am just trying to burn a DVD with:
#!/bin/tcsh
setenv SIZE `mkisofs -dvd-video -q -print-size -V $1 $2`
setenv CDR_SECURITY 8:dvd...
mkisofs -dvd-video -V $1 $2 | cdrecord-prodvd -v dev=2,0,0 fs=64m speed=4 -eject -dao
tsize={$SIZE}s -
And I got:
Cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 2.01a20
Problem solved: Finally I saw the difference between
growisofs -Z /dev/scd0=file.large and
growisofs -Z /dev/scd0 -R -J file.large
DVD+RW-tools works great on my HP 300n DVD+R/RW at least with DVD+R with
speeds up to 4x.
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 20:20, Svante Signell wrote:
When trying to burn a
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:54:09PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Track 01: data 4398 MB
Total size: 5051 MB (500:30.04) = 2252253 sectors
Lout start: 5052 MB (500:32/03) = 2252253 sectors
A du -m -s of the dir gives 4399
I really try to burn
From: Gregoire Favre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am just trying to burn a DVD with:
#!/bin/tcsh
setenv SIZE `mkisofs -dvd-video -q -print-size -V $1 $2`
setenv CDR_SECURITY 8:dvd...
mkisofs -dvd-video -V $1 $2 | cdrecord-prodvd -v dev=2,0,0 fs=64m speed=4 -eject -dao
tsize={$SIZE}s -
And I got:
On Monday 15 December 2003 06:00, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Did you try cdrecord-ProDVD?
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/
Hello Jörg,
I got cdrecord-ProDVD to run after a bit. It burned the DVD+RW and it is mounted and
readable.
No errors at present. The ouput from cdrecord-ProDVD
Well, I finally found a DVD-ROM to test on, though I'm not 100% sure if it's
free of CSS (mplayer doesn't seem to indicate it's using CSS, so that's a
good sign). The read speed for the disk ends up topping out at around 3MB/s
with the CPU using about 80%-90% CPU time in kernel space. A test
On Monday 15 December 2003 06:00, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Did you try cdrecord-ProDVD?
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/
Jörg
The drive appears to back to functioning once again. I had to
reboot several times. I was able to do what I wanted to do though
and that was to burn the
Well, I finally found a DVD-ROM to test on, though I'm not 100% sure if it's
free of CSS (mplayer doesn't seem to indicate it's using CSS, so that's a
good sign). The read speed for the disk ends up topping out at around 3MB/s
with the CPU using about 80%-90% CPU time in kernel space. A test
I assumed that hardware / software does
automaticly set the speed to a reasonable value.
And you assumed correctly. If media is *properly* supported by firmware
you have *all* rights to expect that firmware automatically picks
reasonable speed for it.
And now after playing around a long time
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pictures growisofs -speed=1 -Z
/dev/scd0=fotos-backup.iso
:-( /dev/scd0: unsupported MMC profile 10
now it says doesn't look like recordable media to me.
I like your program, but a more user friendly error message would
be usefull. Not every linux user is a
Well, it seemed like a good idea to sort of follow-up on my previous message,
so here it is.
Unlikely what Andy seemed to think, I really wasn't asking this list for
kenrel support. I was actually trying to find out if anyone else was having
the same problem. That problem is under ide-cd
The first drive identified itself as Generic 2.15 and the second
drive identified itself as Optorite DVD RW DD0203 2.11.
Might be same OEM, meaning that they might be sharing firmware [and
consequently firmware bugs]. It's a djungle out there...
I have
located a firmware update for the
From: Kuwanger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, it seemed like a good idea to sort of follow-up on my previous message,
so here it is.
Unlikely what Andy seemed to think, I really wasn't asking this list for
kenrel support. I was actually trying to find out if anyone else was having
the same problem.
From: Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yesterday I bought a DVD+R media (brand Creation). It burned
and plays without any errors or warnings. Does it mean DVD+R
are less problematic than DVD-R in combi burners?
This statement doesn't hold *universally* true, but DVD+ is less
problematic in
X-Original-To: cdwrite@other.debian.org
I just purchased a new dual format DVD burner. It is an Utmost
Technology unit. As I understand this drive is distributed by
several manufacturers. I purchased the first unit on Friday and I
was not able to get it to work correctly so I returned it as
On Monday 15 December 2003 05:53, Andy Polyakov wrote:
These errors are typical of the burned DVD+RW from other drives
as well. The media can be erased and then reused. I have
confirmed that the media is usable in another drive.
So it can't read media recorded in *other* recorders
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 13 17:47:36 2003
I have tried the ProDVD version and I got Alarm Clock...
The key in the README is the same as the one I use with
/cdrecord-prodvd-2.01a11-i586-pc-linux-gnu
This (alpha) binary is not yet one year old so it should work.
Do you have a wall clock
On Monday 15 December 2003 06:00, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Did you try cdrecord-ProDVD?
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/
Jörg
I haven't used this program for a long time. But I will update my
installation and test it tonight.
Thanks,
James
From: Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
This is a patch that allows to set a different realtime priority for
cdrecord.
Is usefull if other realtime processes are running.
Not needed.sorry
Jörg
--
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:59:24PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 13 17:47:36 2003
I have tried the ProDVD version and I got Alarm Clock...
The key in the README is the same as the one I use with
/cdrecord-prodvd-2.01a11-i586-pc-linux-gnu
This (alpha) binary
I have improved the DVD patch to cdrecord. It should be able to format
and burn DVD+RW media (altough I have only one DVD+RW blank media to
test, and surely have done incomplete tests).
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/files/cdrtools/index.html
You can find binary packages either in the
Unlikely what Andy seemed to think, I really wasn't asking this list for
kenrel support.
Don't take things which are said in public personally. At least not what
I say:-) What I've said was pretty common commentary, in certain degree
addressing rest of the croud and merely denoting what
Hi all,
as the most recent Linux binary for cdrecord-ProDVD has been compiled
on a machine with is i686-pc-linux instead of i586-pc-linux,
a new key is needed. Please fetch it from:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353
Looks like you dont have DMA :-(
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 0.4x. Requestor's computer (which
was described in originating post) should perform over 2x without DMA.
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 1 to 2 CPU spikes per second,
but as high load all the time. The comment is
Looks like you dont have DMA :-(
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 0.4x. Requestor's computer (which
was described in originating post) should perform over 2x without DMA.
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 1 to 2 CPU spikes per second,
but as high load all the time. The comment
From: Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like you dont have DMA :-(
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 0.4x. Requestor's computer (which
was described in originating post) should perform over 2x without DMA.
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 1 to 2 CPU spikes per second,
but as
Looks like you dont have DMA :-(
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 0.4x. Requestor's computer (which
was described in originating post) should perform over 2x without DMA.
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 1 to 2 CPU spikes per second,
but as high load all the time. The
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:51:22PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Hi all,
as the most recent Linux binary for cdrecord-ProDVD has been compiled
on a machine with is i686-pc-linux instead of i586-pc-linux,
a new key is needed. Please fetch it from:
From: Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like you dont have DMA :-(
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 0.4x. Requestor's computer (which
was described in originating post) should perform over 2x without DMA.
Lack of DMA doesn't manifest itself as 1 to 2 CPU spikes per second,
but
Hello,
I am just trying to burn a DVD with:
#!/bin/tcsh
setenv SIZE `mkisofs -dvd-video -q -print-size -V $1 $2`
setenv CDR_SECURITY 8:dvd...
mkisofs -dvd-video -V $1 $2 | cdrecord-prodvd -v dev=2,0,0 fs=64m speed=4
-eject -dao tsize={$SIZE}s -
And I got:
Cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 2.01a20
Problem solved: Finally I saw the difference between
growisofs -Z /dev/scd0=file.large and
growisofs -Z /dev/scd0 -R -J file.large
DVD+RW-tools works great on my HP 300n DVD+R/RW at least with DVD+R with
speeds up to 4x.
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 20:20, Svante Signell wrote:
When trying to burn a
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:54:09PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Track 01: data 4398 MB
Total size: 5051 MB (500:30.04) = 2252253 sectors
Lout start: 5052 MB (500:32/03) = 2252253 sectors
A du -m -s of the dir gives 4399
I really try to burn
Jörg, I don't care about silly arguments about who's right, but I have
to agree 100% with Andy's assessment of the situation. He gave sound
reason for his conclusion. I am still very interested in your detailed
technical explanation on why a fast CPU with 0% load only manages a 0.4x
DVD burn speed
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:25:15AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shure?
I bought 200 no name with case and I have already burn about 50 without
problem... I have some other I could try with...
Well, with a Princo DVD-RW it start to burn ;-)
So unfortunately for me you should have right: all
On Monday 15 December 2003 05:53, Andy Polyakov wrote:
One thing comes to mind. It's possible that Nero applies OPC,
Optimal Power Calibration procedure even to DVD+RW, which might
do the trick. Note that OPC is defined in DVD-dash context only,
but there is a chance that some firmwares
From: Gregoire Favre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am just trying to burn a DVD with:
#!/bin/tcsh
setenv SIZE `mkisofs -dvd-video -q -print-size -V $1 $2`
setenv CDR_SECURITY 8:dvd...
mkisofs -dvd-video -V $1 $2 | cdrecord-prodvd -v dev=2,0,0 fs=64m speed=4
-eject -dao tsize={$SIZE}s -
And I got:
Old-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try a medium that is accepted by the writer. It is known to be
a bit specific abut media it likes.
Well, I always use the same media???
Shure?
What kind of media do you use?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
On Monday 15 December 2003 06:00, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Did you try cdrecord-ProDVD?
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/
Hello Jörg,
I got cdrecord-ProDVD to run after a bit. It burned the DVD+RW and it is
mounted and readable.
No errors at present. The ouput from cdrecord-ProDVD
Well, I finally found a DVD-ROM to test on, though I'm not 100% sure if it's
free of CSS (mplayer doesn't seem to indicate it's using CSS, so that's a
good sign). The read speed for the disk ends up topping out at around 3MB/s
with the CPU using about 80%-90% CPU time in kernel space. A test
On Monday 15 December 2003 06:00, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Did you try cdrecord-ProDVD?
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/
Jörg
The drive appears to back to functioning once again. I had to
reboot several times. I was able to do what I wanted to do though
and that was to burn the
Well, I finally found a DVD-ROM to test on, though I'm not 100% sure if it's
free of CSS (mplayer doesn't seem to indicate it's using CSS, so that's a
good sign). The read speed for the disk ends up topping out at around 3MB/s
with the CPU using about 80%-90% CPU time in kernel space. A test
53 matches
Mail list logo
