On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:54:27PM -0400, Steven Friedrich
wrote:
On Sunday 05 June 2005 10:40 pm, Rob Bogus wrote:
Steven Friedrich wrote:
Under FreeBSD ports, the description for cdrecord gives
this web site:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 08:16:46AM -0400, James Finnall wrote:
On Saturday 21 May 2005 05:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for curiosity: when did this raw device thingee
start to work ? Is it a spinoff from udf-tools ? How
official did it become inbetween ? I'm still using kernel
2.4
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 07:08:06AM -0400, Rob Bogus wrote:
If you found a bug in Linux which causes a panic I would
be amazed if it doesn't get fixed. If you found an obscure
feature which doesn't work, I can believe that without effort.
Can you clarify?
Yes. After the kernel panicked for a
I'd disagree about its validity. Blanking a CDRW disc before
writing sounded reasonable enough to me. I always thought
that it didn't work because Linux was buggy.
(About my Linux was buggy comment: I started noticing this
after mounting HFS CDROM's started causing kernel panics, and
afterwards
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:40:15PM +0200, Andy Polyakov wrote:
Does the fact that you pose this question mean that hfsutils
do not generate partition table? Once again, this kind of goes
beyond the scope of discussions on this list. I mean hfsutils
maintainer is probably more appropriate
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:13:23AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Linux(iirc since 2.2) supports a finer grained permission
model than switching UID, POSIX capabilities[1]. Instead of
switching to/from root bracketing each SCSI command you'd
simply retain the necessary capability,
Hi,
when Joerg says volume management, he does NOT refer to
LVM/RAID stuff; he means automounters and things like that.
(And my untrained eyes don't see anything wrong with the
ps output. But you don't want to trust me here.)
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 01:28:34PM -0400, Dan wrote:
On Sat,
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 03:15:31PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Ambrose Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But note that if you use ide-scsi on 2.4, don't try to create
HFS/ISO9660 hybrid disks. Otherwise your computer will lock up
when you mount your disk to verify it.
[...]
I would not believe
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:21:24PM -0400, Rob Bogus mail account
wrote:
I *strongly* suggest using ide-scsi with 2.4 kernels. You want
to boot with something like hdc=ide-scsi I believe, that
what I use for all my working 2.4 systems. The device will
probably be 0.0.0, but do check by looking
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:05:41PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I just did run a test that verifies that the 708 in fact
returns 36 bytes. So the problem is definitely caused by a
Linux driver bug.
I tend to believe that growisofs just does not check the SCSI
status byte and for this
I have a very high respect for Joerg. But please let me comment
a little on this.
Back in the former times (I started using GNU/Linux back
when the only distros were SLS and Slackware), apps assumed
that the kernel header files are in a linux directory in the
system include path (the
Yes, myself is to blame for not checking the updated FHS. But
why would anyone upgrading from libc5 to libc6 suspect that a
change in the FHS should affect the upgrade (esp. if the libc6
docs do not refer to the FHS)?
So my main complaint will be that I'll need to dig around
per se, in unknown
I have a very high respect for Joerg. But please let me comment
a little on this.
Back in the former times (I started using GNU/Linux back
when the only distros were SLS and Slackware), apps assumed
that the kernel header files are in a linux directory in the
system include path (the
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 04:41:55PM +0200, Anssi Saari wrote:
I tried reporting this, as Liteon actually has a problem report form on
their website. Unfortunately it didn't work. I only understood the word
'Microsoft' from the error message, since my Chinese isn't very good.
do you have
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 04:41:55PM +0200, Anssi Saari wrote:
I tried reporting this, as Liteon actually has a problem report form on
their website. Unfortunately it didn't work. I only understood the word
'Microsoft' from the error message, since my Chinese isn't very good.
do you have
mode would use DMA instead of PIO. Curiousity only, the
ide-scsi is working fine.
--
E. Robert Bogusta
It seemed like a good idea at the time
--
Ambrose LI Cheuk-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
the same problem with both my home and
work computers.
And both computers worked perfectly (with ide-scsi) when I used a
2.2 kernel. After upgrading to 2.4, at first I thought my computer
broke down.
--
Ambrose LI Cheuk-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
mode would use DMA instead of PIO. Curiousity only, the
ide-scsi is working fine.
--
E. Robert Bogusta
It seemed like a good idea at the time
--
Ambrose LI Cheuk-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/
the same problem with both my home and
work computers.
And both computers worked perfectly (with ide-scsi) when I used a
2.2 kernel. After upgrading to 2.4, at first I thought my computer
broke down.
--
Ambrose LI Cheuk-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/
Hello,
sorry if this is a stupid question.
I just downloaded cdrtools-2.01a20pre2 to try out its ATAPI
support. (Linux 2.4's ide-scsi seems to be very broken.)
I noticed the following:
- cdrecord dev=help says bus scanning is supported for the ATAPI
transport;
- However, if I run cdrecord
Hello,
sorry if this is a stupid question.
I just downloaded cdrtools-2.01a20pre2 to try out its ATAPI
support. (Linux 2.4's ide-scsi seems to be very broken.)
I noticed the following:
- cdrecord dev=help says bus scanning is supported for the ATAPI
transport;
- However, if I run cdrecord
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 12:33:12AM +1300, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
If we're talking about ISO9660 layout prepared by mkisofs,
then those more blocks are known to be insignificant and
you can as well checksum every file instead of the whole
filesystem image, can't you?
No. Checksumming
think for
the user, having to look there is a bit too much.
--
Ambrose LI Cheuk-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
--
Ambrose LI Cheuk-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it is not
unreasonable to say that the docs *are* unclear.
I did submit a bug report; the man page should mention this in
the future...
Best regards,
--
Ambrose LI Cheuk-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
,
--
Ambrose LI Cheuk-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, a previously unknown bug, or it is something
that I did wrong.
The cdrtools version I have used are 2.00.3 (latest stable
version) and 2.01a16 (latest testing version).
Best regards,
--
Ambrose LI Cheuk-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
27 matches
Mail list logo
