Cool - I wasn't aware you could do that - thanks for the tip!
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
List,
Whilst I'm in the mood for contributing stuff, here's another little
howto I wrote on securing SSH that has proved popular in the past:
Ned Slider napsal(a):
David Hrbác wrote:
David - sorry, I don't speak fluent sed, but I assume you're suggesting
limiting the protocol to SSH2 only? ie, editing /etc/ssh/sshd_config to:
# Protocol 2,1
Protocol 2
Yes, Ned.
D.
___
I'm writing a short howto article for WoWWiki and thought it'd be nice to
add the CentOS logo to the page. I looked at Wikipedia and they have this
page with the logo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Centos_logo.png
Note the issues mentioned there.
I'd like to use it here, on another
Shawn K. O'Shea wrote:
I was really curious about this, so I googled around a bit. I don't
know about the support in the environment variables, but from what I'm
reading, the %40 encoding should definitely work if you use the
proxy variables in yum.conf, ie:
Feizhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefano Biagiotti wrote:
On CentOS 4 I can't view the mailq man page. I installed postfix and
removed sendmail.
# LANG=en_US man mailq
fopen: No such file or directory
Cannot open man page /usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz
No manual entry for mailq
# zcat
Stefano Biagiotti wrote:
Feizhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefano Biagiotti wrote:
On CentOS 4 I can't view the mailq man page. I installed postfix and
removed sendmail.
# LANG=en_US man mailq
fopen: No such file or directory
Cannot open man page /usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz
No manual
Hmm, how are you creating your ext3 filesystem(s) that you test on?
Try creating it with a large journal (maybe 256MB) and run it in
full journal mode.
The filesystem was created during the initial CentOS installation,
and I've tried it with ext2 which made no difference.
S.
Simon Banton wrote:
Hmm, how are you creating your ext3 filesystem(s) that you test on?
Try creating it with a large journal (maybe 256MB) and run it in full
journal mode.
The filesystem was created during the initial CentOS installation, and
I've tried it with ext2 which made no difference.
At 17:34 +0800 14/9/07, Feizhou wrote:
.ohdo you have a BBU for your write cache on your 3ware board?
Not installed, but the machine's on a UPS.
I see where you're going with larger journal idea and I'll give that a go.
Cheers
S.
___
CentOS
Feizhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After I also removed the sendmail package.
man mailq
--partial content--
SENDMAIL(1)
SENDMAIL(1)
NAME
sendmail - Postfix to Sendmail compatibility interface
What do ls -al /usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz and
rpm -qf
Craig White wrote:
Anyway, KDM is display manager and I am only getting grey screen with X
...
# tail -n 3 /usr/share/config/kdm/Xaccess
# The following line was added by ltspcfg
#
*# Allow remote connects
how do I enable non local logins?
That's the right setting, but you
: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20070914/40d3f5f0/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:22:16 +0200
From: Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED
Simon Banton wrote:
At 08:09 -0400 14/9/07, Jim Perrin wrote:
Have you done any filesystem optimization and tried matching the
filesystem to the raid chunk size?
No, I haven't. This is 3ware hardware RAID-1 on two disks with a
single LVM ext3 / partition - I'm afraid I don't know how to
Simon Banton wrote:
At 08:09 -0400 14/9/07, Jim Perrin wrote:
Have you done any filesystem optimization and tried matching the
filesystem to the raid chunk size?
No, I haven't. This is 3ware hardware RAID-1 on two disks with a
single LVM ext3 / partition - I'm afraid I don't know how to go
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
Unfortunately that isn't much use if you're running the default
system with prelink as it changes large numbers of executables
rendering the RPM verify close to useless.
unless you are using a very old
At 15:43 +0200 14/9/07, Sebastian Walter wrote:
Simon Banton wrote:
No, I haven't. This is 3ware hardware RAID-1 on two disks with a
single LVM ext3 / partition - I'm afraid I don't know how to go about
discovering the chunk size to plug into Ross's calcs.
You can see the chunk size
At 09:41 -0400 14/9/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Try getting another identical 3ware card and swapping them. If it
produces the same problem, then try putting that card in another
box with a different motherboard to see if it works then.
I've got three identical machines here - two as yet not
Simon Banton wrote:
At 15:43 +0200 14/9/07, Sebastian Walter wrote:
Simon Banton wrote:
No, I haven't. This is 3ware hardware RAID-1 on two disks with a
single LVM ext3 / partition - I'm afraid I don't know how
to go about
discovering the chunk size to plug into Ross's calcs.
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 06:56 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Craig White wrote:
Anyway, KDM is display manager and I am only getting grey screen with X
...
# tail -n 3 /usr/share/config/kdm/Xaccess
# The following line was added by ltspcfg
#
*# Allow remote connects
how do I enable
Feizhou wrote:
Simon Banton wrote:
At 17:34 +0800 14/9/07, Feizhou wrote:
.ohdo you have a BBU for your write cache on your 3ware board?
Not installed, but the machine's on a UPS.
Ugh. The 3ware code will not give OK then until the stuff has
hit disk.
I see where you're
On Tuesday 11 September 2007, R P Herrold wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Lamar Owen wrote:
What is the minimum for actual hardware? I have a small
s390 here that I've been looking for a reason to power up.
What sort of access is needed?
Goodness ... the Stuff you have in your closet at
Hi Everyone,
I have a server with two NICs. One NIC is already configured for network
A, but the second is disabled at the moment. I want to enable it too,
but put it on network B. Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that.
Well, what I've tried hasn't worked anyway.
Each NIC is plugged into
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have a server with two NICs. One NIC is already configured
for network
A, but the second is disabled at the moment. I want to enable it too,
but put it on network B. Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that.
Well, what I've tried hasn't
Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 06:56 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
That's the right setting, but you (sometimes) need to completely restart
X (or maybe only kdm?) for any changes in Xaccess to take effect.
I wasn't sure how to restart kdm so I did a yum update and rebooted and
What you're asking can be done a number of ways with different levels
of complexity, the simplest using routing tables and IPTABLES.
Instead of asking this list how to technically do this, I'd suggest
that first you describe what you're trying to accomplish at a higher
level. And be very
Lamar Owen wrote:
If someone would like to donate a midsized 208VAC-capable (single-phase OK,
but has to be 208 and not 240, or at least jumperable) UPS to the effort,
about a 3000VA unit or so, that would help matters considerably! All my good
UPS's are 120VAC at this point (my one good
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 11:12 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 06:56 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
That's the right setting, but you (sometimes) need to completely restart
X (or maybe only kdm?) for any changes in Xaccess to take effect.
I wasn't sure
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 06:56 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Craig White wrote:
Anyway, KDM is display manager and I am only getting grey screen with X
...
# tail -n 3 /usr/share/config/kdm/Xaccess
# The following line was added by ltspcfg
#
*# Allow remote connects
how do I enable
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Lamar Owen wrote:
If someone would like to donate a midsized 208VAC-capable
(single-phase OK, but has to be 208 and not 240, or at least
jumperable) UPS to the effort, about a 3000VA unit or so,
that would help matters considerably!
As it turns out, I _may_ actually
At 23:07 +0800 14/9/07, Feizhou wrote:
Well, I do not think it will help much with a larger journal...you
want RAM speed, not single 250GB SATA disk speed.
Right now, I'd be happy with being able to configure the 3Ware care
as a plain old SATA II passthru interface and do software RAID1 with
At 11:16 -0400 14/9/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Yes, a write-back cache with a BBU will definitely help, also your config,
The write-cache is enabled, but what I've not known up to now is that
the absence of a BBU will impact IO performance in this way - which
seems to be what you and
I'm hoping that someone on this list can shed some light on how
Linux/CentOS decides which IP address to report when a Windows desktop
attempts to access it via SAMBA/WINS.
The CentOS system in question is running a single NIC and OpenVPN
which adds two additional virtual NICs. This is a backup
On Friday 14 September 2007, R P Herrold wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Lamar Owen wrote:
If someone would like to donate a midsized 208VAC-capable
(single-phase OK, but has to be 208 and not 240, or at least
jumperable) UPS to the effort, about a 3000VA unit or so,
that would help matters
I noticed a new upstream kernel was released yesterday and now wondered
how long until the corresponding version of the centosplus kernels are
updated?
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0705.html
--
Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the
intelligence of the
--- Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 14 September 2007, R P Herrold wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Lamar Owen wrote:
If someone would like to donate a midsized
208VAC-capable
(single-phase OK, but has to be 208 and not 240,
or at least
jumperable) UPS to the effort, about
[Veering off-topic; mods, I'll not continue this branch of the thread much
longer]
On Friday 14 September 2007, John R Pierce wrote:
I've gotten away with running some 208V equipment on a 120V UPS using a
step-up transformer which had a 208V tap (and 220V, 240V). Of course,
3000VA is
Brett Serkez wrote:
I'm hoping that someone on this list can shed some light on how
Linux/CentOS decides which IP address to report when a Windows desktop
attempts to access it via SAMBA/WINS.
...
Ultimately I'd like the CentOS system to always report its 10.44.0.x
address. Is there anyway to
Hi,
today in yum update show this problem:
Segmentation fault
Any idea about this problem?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 9/14/07, Daniel Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
today in yum update show this problem:
Segmentation fault
Any idea about this problem?
Could you provide us a bit more detail please?
Which version of centos are you using, and on which architecture?
Do you have any additional
Centos 5, i386
I dont have additional repositories.
The system was installed recently..
On 9/14/07, Jim Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Daniel Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
today in yum update show this problem:
Segmentation fault
Any idea about this problem?
When using ifcfg-eth0:x files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/, should
each file (where x increments appropriately) point to DEVICE=eth0:x or
DEVICE=eth0:0?
I apparently have my alias files all ifcfg-eth0:0 - ifcfg-eth0:7 show
DEVICE=eth0:0. Is this right? It seems odd to me and while it does
[Administrivia: should this be on CentOS-devel instead of the regular CentOS
list? If so, please redirect.]
On Friday 14 September 2007, Lamar Owen wrote:
Whew. As typical, you have thoroughly thought through things. Let me see
if the beast will power up and whether the OS/2 console
I apparently have my alias files all ifcfg-eth0:0 - ifcfg-eth0:7 show
DEVICE=eth0:0. Is this right? It seems odd to me and while it does
seem odd, the alias IPs are being appropriately responded to, answering
pings and nameserver requests.
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0 =
On 9/14/07, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/RangeOfIpsOnEthx
Suggestions are welcome and much appreciated.
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
Jim Perrin wrote:
On 9/14/07, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/RangeOfIpsOnEthx
Hi Jim,
Thank you for the link...it's definitely good to know one can assign a
range of IPs with ease using that type of directive.
As my additional IPs were not
I rebooted yesterday. Have 2 kernels
I haven't messed with python recently
On 9/14/07, Jim Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Daniel Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
today in yum update show this problem:
Segmentation fault
Any idea about this problem?
Could you
On 9/14/07, Daniel Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Centos 5, i386
I dont have additional repositories.
The system was installed recently..
And the rest of the information?
Also, run yum in debug mode and see what it says.
yum -d6 update
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
Barry Brimer wrote:
I apparently have my alias files all ifcfg-eth0:0 - ifcfg-eth0:7 show
DEVICE=eth0:0. Is this right? It seems odd to me and while it does
seem odd, the alias IPs are being appropriately responded to, answering
pings and nameserver requests.
geekylucas wrote:
Hi,
I attempted to ugprade glibc glibc-devel and ended up removing them
entirely by accident. *idiot*
What are the steps needed to get glibc back onto my system.
Absolutely nothing is working at the moment, rpm, yum, etc. I presume
I'm going to have to boot from a rescue
Brett Serkez wrote:
pretty sure thats configurable in SMB.CONF
[global]
interfaces = [ (ip address or network interface or ip/mask or
broadcast/mask) ...]
Researched this before I emailed originally, this doesn't do it.
Even if I specify only the subnet I want in all these
Bill Campbell wrote:
It appears that it's installing i386 and x86_64 versions of
packages. ``rpm -qa | sort | uniq -c'' shows 337 packages with
the duplicate names.
rpm based distributions have supported and handled multilib for a very
long time. You might want to read up about that and how
Hello List,
I need to access some data a MS-SQL server ie run a stored procedure or
user-defined function or a select every so often maybe 3 times a day.
Have centos 4.5 on intel xeon. Is there an obvious certain-to-succeed
approach?
perl DBI + ODBC spings to mind, have not tried it yet -
Tony Barratt wrote:
Hello List,
I need to access some data a MS-SQL server ie run a stored
procedure or
user-defined function or a select every so often maybe 3 times a day.
Have centos 4.5 on intel xeon. Is there an obvious certain-to-succeed
approach?
perl DBI + ODBC spings to
Tony Barratt wrote:
Hello List,
I need to access some data a MS-SQL server ie run a stored procedure
or user-defined function or a select every so often maybe 3 times a day.
Have centos 4.5 on intel xeon. Is there an obvious certain-to-succeed
approach?
perl DBI + ODBC spings to mind, have
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Tony Barratt wrote:
Hello List,
I need to access some data a MS-SQL server ie run a stored
procedure or
user-defined function or a select every so often maybe 3
times a day.
Have centos 4.5 on intel xeon. Is there an obvious
certain-to-succeed
55 matches
Mail list logo
