CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0323 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0323.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
513cbea0fee3d2e0b2c7731c081b4cdc
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0951 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0951.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
1b1bde0b4188df08b87e878edebaa69f
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0951 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0951.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
1b1bde0b4188df08b87e878edebaa69f
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0952
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0952.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
d94ae2a61adbac653d9fc57af3834432
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0952
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0952.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
1a2ae636d7b13190364782950f113e8e
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0953
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0953.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
4e3a0ef4b2ed1019df88196f418c86b7
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0953
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0953.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
33ba3b44c574c0749ada598ba3ff74d0
Estimados Listeros, quiero solicitar su ayuda en esto, puesto que soy un
neofito, necesito configurar mensajes de autorespuesta en caso de vacaiones,
tengo configurado Sendmail+dovecot+mailscanner Favor de Guiarme como
hacerlo ... donde leer.
Gracias de Antemano
Saludos Cordiales
Rodrigo Julio
--- Rodrigo Julio Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gracias Luis, lo probaré.
bueno, eso quizas te aporte una interfase comoda
para realizar, pero . alguna vez sabras como
funciona por dentro la cosa? creo que obrando de esa
manera solo trasladas la filosofia de M$ windows al
nuevo entorno
Con respecto al USERMIN. Lo que pretendí fue dar una opción ya que por
experiencia mía quienes quieren colocar o manipular este tipo de avisos son
los usuarios que manejan interfaz gráfica o USUARIOS M$ WINDOWS como lo
llaman.
Lo que pretendo es que un usario windows sea un poco mas
Buen día, tengo un servidor con CentOS 5 que acabo de instalar, pero me
equivoque al instalar, tengo 2 discos duros de 70 Gb., en lo que me
equivoque fue que me hizo un solo disco de 70 con los 2, y no lo quiero
así, yo se que es bueno por que hay respaldo, pero no lo necesito así,
me sirve
si, corregi ese error pero igulamente me sigue generando el mismo mensaje
- Mensaje original
De: Maximo Mosalvo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Enviado: martes, 2 de octubre, 2007 12:49:44
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] SARG
Rene Chirivi wrote:
La doble barra que esta en le path
hello,
i saw this thread a bit late, but I had /am having the exact same issues
on a dual-2-core-cpu opteron box with a 9550SX. (Centos 5 x86_64)
What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
everything except / (3ware say their cards are fast, but only on XFS)
AND using
On CentOS5 with the latest updates applied, the logwatch filter for
postfix returns way too many lines from the log. I get an unmatched
entries message and all messages that have gone through the system is
listed.
Here is an example:
8F930A8092: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], orig_to=[EMAIL
Thank you so much for helping me
Now I am trying to use the following command to backup
all files in hda to sda3 (mount on seconddrive folder)
in the same machine and also excludes
/usr/bin/rsync -avz --exclude=/boot1
--exclude=/seconddrive --exclude=/proc /* /seconddrive
try below .
it
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:41:28PM +0200, Morten Torstensen wrote:
On CentOS5 with the latest updates applied, the logwatch filter for
postfix returns way too many lines from the log. I get an unmatched
entries message and all messages that have gone through the system is
listed.
Yeah. My
Rajeev R Veedu wrote:
I have a cups setup for printing purpose. The problem I am facing is
that it doesn’t print more than 1 copy of the same document in single
print command.
could someone guide me how to fix this problem?.
Did you use lp -n num-copies filename... or lpr -#num-copies
Stephen Harris wrote:
Yeah. My fix was to copy the services/postfix file in to
/etc/logwatch/scripts/services/postfix
and edit the file.
Thanks, your patch solved the problem for me. Tho all the config files
are under /usr/share/logwatch on my system. There are some stubs in
/etc/logwatch
Les Bell wrote:
You can suppress messages by adding regexp patterns to
/etc/logwatch/conf/ignore.conf. For example:
Thanks, that can be a handy way too. But I preferred to fix the filter
and will keep ignore.conf as a last stopgap measure.
--
//Morten Torstensen
//Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Morten Torstensen wrote:
Anyway, patching /usr/share/logwatch/services/postfix with your patch
fixed it.
/usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/postfix of course...
--
//Morten Torstensen
//Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And if it turns out that there is a
Hi all
I am wandering how to control /proc/sys/fs/file-max
ls it automatically?
and what is for?
and the maxium?
Thank you
-
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo!
Answers.
I found wxWidgets at
http://rpms.jackal-net.at/yum/centos/4/repodata/repoview/X11.Libraries.group.html
Thanks
Adriano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:27:36 -0300
Adriano Frare [EMAIL PROTECTED] took out a #2 pencil and
scribbled:
Dear Friends,
I need RPM for CENTOS 4.5 to
At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
everything except / (3ware say their cards are fast, but only on
XFS) AND using very low nr_requests for every blockdev on the 3ware
card.
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for this. In my
matthias platzer wrote:
hello,
i saw this thread a bit late, but I had /am having the exact
same issues
on a dual-2-core-cpu opteron box with a 9550SX. (Centos 5 x86_64)
What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
everything except / (3ware say their cards are
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Morten Torstensen wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Yeah. My fix was to copy the services/postfix file in to
/etc/logwatch/scripts/services/postfix
and edit the file.
Thanks, your patch solved the problem for me. Tho all the config files
are under
At 09:24 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Actually the real-real fix was to use the 'deadline' or 'noop' scheduler
with this card as the default 'cfq' scheduler was designed to work with
a single drive and not a multiple drive RAID, so it acts as a govenor on
the amount of IO that a
Simon Banton wrote:
At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
everything except / (3ware say their cards are fast, but only on
XFS) AND using very low nr_requests for every blockdev on the 3ware
card.
Hi
Greg Swallow wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Has someone else gotta LPRng to work on CentOS 5?
Sorry, I wasn't subscribed to the list when this message was posted, so my
reply won't be threaded properly...
Anyways, we build LPRng rpms for SME Server, which is based on CentOS. (7.x =
chloe K wrote:
Hi all
I am wandering how to control /proc/sys/fs/file-max
ls it automatically?
and what is for?
and the maxium?
Thank you
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. *Go to
Yahoo!
Hi,
My denyhosts stop working. How do i check why isnt it working anymore for
me?
Thanks
Oct 2 22:59:17 beyond sshd[15690]: Failed password for root from
221.7.37.142 port 49836 ssh2
Oct 2 22:59:17 beyond sshd[15692]: Received disconnect from 221.7.37.142:
11: Bye Bye
Oct 2 22:59:18
What is the recurring performance problem you are seeing?
Pretty much exactly the symptoms described in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7372 relating to read
starvation under heavy write IO causing sluggish system response.
I recently graphed the blocks in/blocks out from vmstat
Simon Banton wrote:
What is the recurring performance problem you are seeing?
Pretty much exactly the symptoms described in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7372 relating to read
starvation under heavy write IO causing sluggish system response.
I recently graphed the blocks
CentOS List wrote:
Hi,
My denyhosts stop working. How do i check why isnt it working anymore
for me?
Thanks
[snipped log entries]
at the risk alarming you at this point I strongly recommend you run
chkrootkit on your system. If your system has been compromised then
that in and of itself
I sometimes clone working machines by separating RAID1 mirrors and
letting each re-sync with a new partner in different machines. What
will happen if a mismatched pair of these drives ever end up together in
the same machine? If there is any chance that they would automatically
be paired, is
At 12:41 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
If the performance issue is identical to the kernel bug mentioned
in the posting then the only real fix that was mentioned was to
switch to 32bit from 64bit or to down-rev your kernel, which on
CentOS means to go down to 4.5 from 5.0.
The irony
Sorry for the delay - I got pulled off to another cirtical project for
a while. Thanks for the info on crypt guys...
I still haven't solved this problem... I've tried mulitple different
copies of the string - and it is the complete string. The next thing
I'm going to try is a different password
Simon Banton wrote:
What is the recurring performance problem you are seeing?
Pretty much exactly the symptoms described in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7372 relating to read
starvation under heavy write IO causing sluggish system response.
I recently graphed the blocks
Simon Banton wrote:
At 12:41 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
If the performance issue is identical to the kernel bug mentioned
in the posting then the only real fix that was mentioned was to
switch to 32bit from 64bit or to down-rev your kernel, which on
CentOS means to go down to
on 10/2/2007 3:41 AM Morten Torstensen spake the following:
On CentOS5 with the latest updates applied, the logwatch filter for
postfix returns way too many lines from the log. I get an unmatched
entries message and all messages that have gone through the system is
listed.
Here is an
At 13:03 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Have you tried calculating the performance of your current drives on
paper to see if it matches your reality? It may just be that your
disks suck...
They're performing to spec for 7200rpm SATA II drives - your help in
determining which was the
on 10/2/2007 9:45 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
I sometimes clone working machines by separating RAID1 mirrors and
letting each re-sync with a new partner in different machines. What
will happen if a mismatched pair of these drives ever end up together in
the same machine? If there is
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Simon Banton wrote:
At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
everything except / (3ware say their cards are fast, but only on
XFS) AND using
Scott Silva wrote:
on 10/2/2007 9:45 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
I sometimes clone working machines by separating RAID1 mirrors and
letting each re-sync with a new partner in different machines. What
will happen if a mismatched pair of these drives ever end up together
in the same
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:57:28PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Simon Banton wrote:
At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
everything
I've been handed a Supermicro system that is using the Intel® H6300ESB
Serial ATA Controller (Supermicro P4SCI motherboard). When I install
CentOS5, everything seems to work OK, but it has absolutely horrid disk
performance. Upon further inspection, it seems that the SATA disks are
being
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Simon Banton wrote:
At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
What I did to work around them was basically switching
to XFS for
everything except / (3ware say their cards are
on 10/2/2007 11:36 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 10/2/2007 9:45 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
I sometimes clone working machines by separating RAID1 mirrors and
letting each re-sync with a new partner in different machines. What
will happen if a mismatched
Scott Silva wrote:
Are you using the latest from www.logwatch.org (7.3.6) or the old
version bundled with CentOS?
I am using the base yum repos. No time to remember to chase down a
myriad of different program packages from different websites. I am sure
this problem is solved in newer
Hey,
I'm trying to run a kickstart script on a new piece of hardware...
I've never used this HW before, so it's possible that there may be
something faulty...
After the DVD boots, I type linux ks=http://blah/blah.ks; and hit enter.
Once I get to the anaconda line which says running
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:15:44AM -0400, David Mackintosh wrote:
Ok, so if you tuned in last time, I couldn't make the installation/upgrade of
PHP5 from the Centos4 CentOS Plus repository work. Not one to be easilly
dissuaded, I shapened my shovel and dug myself a hole.
[...]
Now, my users
I just want to confirm that this is a bug before reporting it to Bugzilla.
I started with the sample named.conf included in the distribution and found
that I couldn't query my server from outside my LAN. I finally traced it
down to the match expressions in the sample's external view.
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to exclude a directory (and all file and sub-directories
under that directory) when using rsync.
I have spent two days on google, but everything that I can find there
involves excluding individual files, not an entire directory.
I have tried the following commands,
I am trying to exclude a directory (and all file and sub-directories
under that directory) when using rsync.
I have spent two days on google, but everything that I can find there
involves excluding individual files, not an entire directory.
Have you tried a simple rsync --exclude remove_dir
This may work. If worked, Pls reply to the list by appending SOLVED to the
subject line. Then, Others can beniit.
rsync -avz --delete --exclude=**/stats --exclude=**/error
--exclude=**/files/pictures -e ssh -i /root/rsync/mirror-rsync-key
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/www/ /var/www/
(The --delete
At Tue, 2 Oct 2007 it looks like Alfred von Campe composed:
I am trying to exclude a directory (and all file and sub-directories
under that directory) when using rsync.
I have spent two days on google, but everything that I can find there
involves excluding individual files, not an
55 matches
Mail list logo
