Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki restructure

2007-10-06 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado
On 9/27/07, Dag Wieers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, ... I would propose something like this: http://wiki.centos.org/FrontPageProposal and move everything to the subsections (maybe even move page references to fit in these subsections). With a change like this, the wiki will

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0933 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 elinks - security update

2007-10-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0933 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0933.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: elinks-0.9.2-3.3.5.2.i386.rpm src: elinks-0.9.2-3.3.5.2.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0933 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 elinks - security update

2007-10-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0933 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0933.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: elinks-0.9.2-3.3.5.2.x86_64.rpm src: elinks-0.9.2-3.3.5.2.src.rpm signature.asc Description:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0933 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 elinks - security update

2007-10-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0933 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0933.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: elinks-0.11.1-5.1.0.1.el5.x86_64.rpm src: elinks-0.11.1-5.1.0.1.el5.src.rpm signature.asc

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0933 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 elinks - security update

2007-10-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0933 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0933.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: elinks-0.11.1-5.1.0.1.el5.i386.rpm src: elinks-0.11.1-5.1.0.1.el5.i386.rpm signature.asc

Re: [CentOS] How to enable my RAID again

2007-10-06 Thread Centos
Find out what disk belongs to which md-set and try the --assemble option.. This should fix it, I think Theo Band wrote: Hi I have setup software RAID two years ago using FC3 using the graphical installer (RAID1). In the mean time I installed CENTOS4.5 and everything is running fine. At least

[CentOS] Damaged rpm database?

2007-10-06 Thread M. Fioretti
Hello, while doing some maintenance on a Centos 4.4 box, I ran rpm -qa --last and got: error: rpmdb: damaged header #91 retrieved -- skipping. ...lots of lines identical to the one above and finally: the_last_package_I_installed_yesterday.rpm all the other rpms in reverse installation order

RE: [CentOS] Damaged rpm database?

2007-10-06 Thread Steven Haigh
1) This could be anything. From file system corruption, to a bug. 2) rpm --rebuilddb will do what you need. -- Steven Haigh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [CentOS] Damaged rpm database?

2007-10-06 Thread M. Fioretti
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 04:24:35 AM -0700, Akemi Yagi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On 10/6/07, Steven Haigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) rpm --rebuilddb will do what you need. Run this command with lots of caution. Take a look at this page: http://www.oldrpm.org/hintskinks/repairdb/ and

Re: [CentOS] flex package marked as fc6 and no flex-devel?

2007-10-06 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 11:38 +0500, umair shakil wrote: Salam, What is the problem the haan?? go and install flex. Regards, Umair Shakil ETD On 9/29/07, Steven Haigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm in the middle of setting up a build

[CentOS] CESA-2007:0933 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 elinks - security update

2007-10-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0933 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0933.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: elinks-0.9.2-3.3.5.2.i386.rpm src: elinks-0.9.2-3.3.5.2.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

[CentOS] expand physical volume

2007-10-06 Thread Thomas Antony
Hi. I added a disk to a hardware raid 5 array and now i want to expand the LVM physical volume. There are now 4 sas 146GB disks in the server. The virtual disk /dev/sdb from the raid controller has been resized successfully with the server management software osma. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#

Re: [CentOS] Damaged rpm database?

2007-10-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 10/6/07, M. Fioretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 04:24:35 AM -0700, Akemi Yagi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On 10/6/07, Steven Haigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) rpm --rebuilddb will do what you need. Run this command with lots of caution. Take a look at this page:

[CentOS] GFS-kernel module - Version Magic Error

2007-10-06 Thread Manish Kathuria
Are the RPMs for the latest GFS kernel module GFS-kernel-2.6.9-72.2.0.8 to be used with the version 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL available ? I tried to compile the Source RPMs available from the Red Hat site but the modules can't be loaded because of invalid module format arising from version magic issues.

Re: [CentOS] Duplicating My CentOS Install For Other Other Systems

2007-10-06 Thread mouss
Antonio Dupont wrote: Hello, I have a CentOS install that has updated packages, and different users with certain privileges and modified GNOME menus. When a user logs in they are very limited to what they can do. i.e. browse the internet, run some php scripts on the local MySQL database I

Re: [CentOS] A quick question about ./configure

2007-10-06 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 12:33 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: On 9/27/07, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/27/07, Jim Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/27/07, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: umair shakil wrote: snip As already pointed out by two big boys... when

Re: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication

2007-10-06 Thread Frank Büttner
John R Pierce schrieb: Whats available for doing near-realtime master-slave file replication between two CentOS systems? Cronjobs running rsync won't cut it. Ideally, I'd like something that works like SLONY-I does for Postgres databases, where all file system block level transactions on

Re: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication

2007-10-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For GFS you dont't need SAN's. You can do it simly. Or take DRBD, but for it you must compile an kernel module. http://www.drbd.org/ CentOS provides DRBD. See: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Ha-Drbd Akemi

Re: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication

2007-10-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Akemi Yagi schrieb: On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For GFS you dont't need SAN's. You can do it simly. Or take DRBD, but for it you must compile an kernel module. http://www.drbd.org/ CentOS provides DRBD. See:

Re: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication

2007-10-06 Thread gjgowey
If using a file system for the file storage isn't mandatory then I would go with an rdbms such as Postgres with the file stored in a blob field of a table. If the systems are in the same location and can use a shared Filesystem then I would look into getting a netraid scsi card or something

Re: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication

2007-10-06 Thread William L. Maltby
Previous reply: wrong key. Sorry. On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 12:01 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Akemi Yagi schrieb: On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For GFS you dont't need SAN's. You can do it simly. Or take DRBD, but for

Re: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication

2007-10-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 10/6/07, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe they are up-to-date now. My understanding is that there is some delay after a new kernel comes out, but it should not be more than a few days. But we have to remember that the whole CentOS project is based on voluntary

Re: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication

2007-10-06 Thread John R Pierce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If using a file system for the file storage isn't mandatory then I would go with an rdbms such as Postgres with the file stored in a blob field of a table. If the systems are in the same location and can use a shared Filesystem then I would look into getting a

Re: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication

2007-10-06 Thread gjgowey
A program that acts as an interface between the rdbms and whatever wants the files can be constructed easilly. Personally I would look into using java to create an applet that uses jdbc to get the files from the rdbms and then uses regular java libraries to ftp it. Stream to stream

[CentOS] Re: Asterisk

2007-10-06 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Friday, October 05, 2007 9:11 PM + Tony Mountifield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That very much depends on who you ask. Many people (myself included) prefer the original version which is actively developed by

Re: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication

2007-10-06 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 13:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: On 10/6/07, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Would not the dkms facility, as described here http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules ameliorate version problems? I'm not sure, but it seems to be

[CentOS] Slightly OT: Building latest ImageMagick on CentOS 3

2007-10-06 Thread Bart Schaefer
I grabbed the latest ImageMagick.src.rpm (version 6.3.6, I believe) from imagemagic.org and verified that I can compile it by hand on CentOS 3. I then commented out all the BuildPrereq and BuildRequires lines and verified that rpmbuild -bc ImageMagick.spec behaved sensibly. However, when I try

Re: [CentOS] expand physical volume

2007-10-06 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Saturday 06 October 2007, Thomas Antony wrote: Hi. I added a disk to a hardware raid 5 array and now i want to expand the LVM physical volume. There are now 4 sas 146GB disks in the server. The virtual disk /dev/sdb from the raid controller has been resized successfully with the server

[CentOS] New launcher in Gnome

2007-10-06 Thread fred smith
Hi! In Centos 5, when I add a launcher to the desktop, it doesn't allow me to choose an icon for the launcher. After creating it, right-click/properties also has no way to choose an icon. It seems to assign one itself, and the one i get looks like a small terminal window, or something. How can

Re: [CentOS] Gnome panels

2007-10-06 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:08:32 -0400 fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know how to tweak Gnome to revert to the single-panel form? Just right-click on the panel that you don't want and delete it. Right-click on the other one and use the properties menu to increase its size. Once you're

Re: [CentOS] New launcher in Gnome

2007-10-06 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:14:48 -0400 fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I pick the icon for a desktop launcher myself? When creating the launcher, click where it says no icon to select your icon. Afterward, you can select properties, then click on the icon where it appears on the Basic

Re: [CentOS] Gnome panels

2007-10-06 Thread fred smith
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:15:13PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:08:32 -0400 fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know how to tweak Gnome to revert to the single-panel form? Just right-click on the panel that you don't want and delete it. Right-click on the other

Re: [CentOS] New launcher in Gnome

2007-10-06 Thread fred smith
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:17:52PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:14:48 -0400 fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I pick the icon for a desktop launcher myself? When creating the launcher, click where it says no icon to select your icon. Afterward, you can

Re: [CentOS] Gnome panels

2007-10-06 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 16:23 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:19:13 -0400 fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But how do I get the menus, etc., from the top panel onto the bottom one? Right-click on the item you want to move, select move, move it to the bottom one. Or