Hi,
I saw some errors in the Amamda backup article that I would correct
and then I would like to start a Banners article that describes what
files have what meaning like, motd, issue, issue.net and what info they
should/could contain.
I have also worked a lot with Asterisk and is keen to move
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 11:48:44AM +0100, Mats Karlsson enlightened us:
I saw some errors in the Amamda backup article that I would correct
and then I would like to start a Banners article that describes what
files have what meaning like, motd, issue, issue.net and what info they
should/could
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 11:48:44AM +0100, Mats Karlsson enlightened us:
I saw some errors in the Amamda backup article that I would correct
and then I would like to start a Banners article that describes what
files have what meaning like, motd, issue, issue.net and what info
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Mats Karlsson wrote:
Hi,
I saw some errors in the Amamda backup article that I would correct
Go ahead. But edit with care.
I will, I'm not normally the careless dude.
and then I would like to start a Banners article that describes what
files have what meaning
On 12/17/07, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
...
Could we add the following image:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postgrey?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=postgrey-en.png
I found the article very clear and easy to read. I would like to thank
you with this image, if it helps of course.
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
On 12/17/07, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
...
Could we add the following image:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postgrey?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=postgrey-en.png
I found the article very clear and easy to read. I would like to thank
you with
Saludos hermano.
Hola a todos y especialmente a Hector, ya arregle el problema, en vez de
cambiar de IDE a AHCI tenia que cambiarlo a Raid...y funciono.
¡Qué bien! Me alegro por ti. :D Además, estamos aquí para ayudarnos, ¿no?
Un saludo.
Lo propio para ti.
Amos Shapira wrote:
On 13/12/2007, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amos Shapira wrote:
I'll just try to avoid updates for now.
Why? It is *highly* unlikely that 5.1 will break *anything* for you. I
mean: Those are still the *SAME* software versions as in 5.0. And those
are the same
Amos Shapira wrote:
Hello,
So I've watched a few threads about the new 5.0 vs. 5.1 upgrade and
have a couple of (hopefully) practical questions about this:
Context - I'd like to stick to 5.0 at least for a while until the dust
around 5.1 settles down (and I'm back from holidays).
As an
I'm in the process of setting up a new system and I have found that the
system is hibernating when its sitting idle for a long period of time.
How do I stop this?
TIA, Jeff
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hmm, I'm never encountered this myself. Could it be BIOS power
management settings?
- Chris
On 24 Dec, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a new system and I have found that
the system is hibernating when its sitting idle for a long period of
time.
I set them to user defined and then disable for all the options.
Chris Brentano wrote:
Hmm, I'm never encountered this myself. Could it be BIOS power
management settings?
- Chris
On 24 Dec, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a new system and I have found
Hi Jeff,
This wouldn't be an IBM netvista wouldn't it? I have the same behaviour on my
machines as well.
Phil
On December 24, 2007, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a new system and I have found that the
system is hibernating when its sitting idle for a long period of
Phil Savoie wrote:
Hi Jeff,
This wouldn't be an IBM netvista wouldn't it? I have the same behaviour on my
machines as well.
Phil
On December 24, 2007, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a new system and I have found that the
system is hibernating when its sitting
I have a netvista and have not been able to upgrade my kernel since
2.9.9-34.0.2. I wouldn't call it hibernating, just after a long period of
idle time (overnight), it runs really slw.
Would really love it figure this one out.
TIA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
...
How did the RPM database have the right values for the sqlite3 file before
prelink was run? Or, another way, why was the file different in the first
place, that running prelink against it fixed it? And
hi,
Just want to wish everyone a happy holiday season and a good new year
ahead.
Its been a great year for CentOS and for everyone involved with it
including the developers, supporters, contributors, editors, bug
reporters, everyone. You all know who you are. And I want to take this
Hi Thomas,
I may have a solution which I found on an Ubuntu list. Seems that my BIOS
needed upgrading as it wasn't the latest. This is what the ubuntu list
indicated as to what the underlying problem was. I just upgraded my bios
just now and will see what happens, i.e., if it slows down
Hi ALL,
Short description of my problem:
I am not able to make wireless network working on the IBM ThinkPad T43p.
System: T43p
OS: CentOS 4.4
kernel: 2.6.9-34.EL
firmware: ipw2200-firmware-3.0-3.nodist.rf.noarch.rpm
What did I do ?
- installed firmware from RPM package
- removed kernel
19 matches
Mail list logo
