[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0055 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 kernel - security update

2008-02-04 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0055 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0055.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: kernel-2.6.9-67.0.4.EL.i586.rpm kernel-2.6.9-67.0.4.EL.i686.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0055 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 kernel - security update

2008-02-04 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0055 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0055.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: kernel-2.6.9-67.0.4.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-67.0.4.EL.x86_64.rpm

Re: [CentOS-virt] Build VirtualBox OSE for CentOS?

2008-02-04 Thread Johnny Hughes
Brian McKenna wrote: I think the problem here is that CentOS isn't designed for personal use, nor do many of us feel that a binary only application should be included when a perfectly fine open source version is available. Also, I personally feel that the full version is more crippled than the

Re: ¡Por favor, un poco de ayuda! Re: [CentOS-es] Problema s con Xvnc y xinetd

2008-02-04 Thread Guillermo Salas M
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 12:56 +0100, ArcosCom Linux User wrote: ¿no hay nadie que sepa un poco de esto? Talvéz nadie aquí lo sabe y por eso no responden. Porqué no buscas soporte de pago? No entiendo porqué el enojo. Cuando se tiene una situación de _emergencia_ lo mas apropiado es recurrir al

[CentOS-es] Problemas para clonar disco

2008-02-04 Thread David Ferreira
Hola amigos, Tengo un servidor basado en CentOS 4.5, con una distribución de particiones estándar: /dev/hda1/boot /dev/hda2VolGroup00 -LogVol00/ -LogVol01swap El disco duro tiene sectores defectuosos y, aunque el

Re: [CentOS-es] Nagios

2008-02-04 Thread Fequay
log Feb 4 08:58:58 sipproxy nrpe[21053]: INFO: SSL/TLS initialized. All network traffic will be encrypted. Feb 4 08:58:58 sipproxy nrpe[21053]: Error: Request contained command arguments! Feb 4 08:58:58 sipproxy nrpe[21053]: Client request was invalid, bailing out... Feb 4 08:58:58 sipproxy

Re: [CentOS-es] Nagios

2008-02-04 Thread Guille
2008/2/4, Fequay [EMAIL PROTECTED]: log Feb 4 08:58:58 sipproxy nrpe[21053]: INFO: SSL/TLS initialized. All network traffic will be encrypted. Feb 4 08:58:58 sipproxy nrpe[21053]: Error: Request contained command arguments! Feb 4 08:58:58 sipproxy nrpe[21053]: Client request was

Re: [CentOS-es] Samba + antivirus

2008-02-04 Thread ArcosCom Linux User
Yo no lo he probado ni sé cómo funciona, pero busca información sobre el módulo clamfs (creo que es así cómo se llama). Sería tema de montarte un sistema de ficheros virtual que embeba el escaneo de ficheros. Creo que es ese el propósito del módulo clamfs (o como se llame). En la documentación

Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-04 Thread John Bowden
On Sunday 03 February 2008 12:12:49 Steve Searle wrote: Around 12:06pm on Sunday, February 03, 2008 (UK time), Jimmy Bradley scrawled: and open it up to find out. Is there a command entered by way of the terminal window that will tell me what kind of cpu I have? I want to say that it's an

Re: [CentOS] Java and Xalan

2008-02-04 Thread Upul Godage
You need to add the xalan.jar etc to the classpath. Something like this. export CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:/xalan/xalan.jar:/xalan/xml- apis.jar:/xalan/xercesImpl.jar:/xalan/serializer.jar http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/commandline.html Upul On Feb 4, 2008 3:09 PM, http://www.pas-world.com [EMAIL

[CentOS] Java and Xalan

2008-02-04 Thread http://www.pas-world.com
Hello, I have some problems running some tools of java in CentOS. Anyone know where is the problem for this? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ java org.apache.xalan.xslt.Process Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.apache.xalan.xslt.Process at

Re: [CentOS] NTP server

2008-02-04 Thread Rainer Traut
Scott Ehrlich schrieb: I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows XP with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate with it via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the Windows Firewall. The C5 system does not have any firewall

[CentOS] CentOS 5.1 on Dell R200 with 6iR?

2008-02-04 Thread Plant, Dean
Hello list, Can anyone confirm if CentOS 5.1 works happily on a Dell R200 with a SAS 6iR RAID controller. Thanks Dean ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Connect to local console from SSH session

2008-02-04 Thread Marcelo Roccasalva
On Feb 4, 2008 1:15 AM, Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to see what is happening on the local console to see the status of something I left running, is there a way to do this? cat /dev/vcs1 (you'll need to setup 80x25 if using X) -- Marcelo ¿No será acaso que ésta vida

Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-04 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:36:28PM +, John Bowden enlightened us: Around 12:06pm on Sunday, February 03, 2008 (UK time), Jimmy Bradley scrawled: and open it up to find out. Is there a command entered by way of the terminal window that will tell me what kind of cpu I have? I want to

Re: [CentOS] cannot rewrite shadow password file

2008-02-04 Thread Samuel Rochas
Dear Michel, Great thank you, this is working now. Will this work after a reboot too? Could you now explain me what was wrong with my SELinux setup? Thank you Regards Samuel Michel van Deventer escribió: On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 17:29 +0100, Samuel Rochas wrote: Dear Michel,

[CentOS] Strong security in user's accounts and paswords..

2008-02-04 Thread israel.garcia
Hi, I have some databases running on CentOS4 with users accessing the shell (bash), so I'd like to strong the security on my server in user's accounts and passwords.. I mean, enforcing strong passwords, min/max age passwords, locking passwords when you fail 3 times, and all this stuff. Is there

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 loses ip address (newbie question)

2008-02-04 Thread Johnny Hughes
John R Pierce wrote: frankly3d-centos wrote: Reserved ip in 192.168.x.x range for CenOS 5 (Samba Server) loses samba clients due to eth0 losing it's ip. eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:61:72:AB:98 inet addr:169.254.66.122 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-02-04 Thread Milton Calnek
mouss wrote: Les Bell wrote: mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you consider this security through obscurity, then why not publish the list of your users on a public web page? after all, you should use strong passwords, so why hide usernames? Usernames are comparatively hard to guess, and

Re: [CentOS] Re: Monitor power save question

2008-02-04 Thread David G. Miller
I wrote and now I'm answering my own post: nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David G. Miller wrote: Section Device Identifier Videocard0 Driver vesa EndSection [..] and the video card is (this is a single card that

Re: [CentOS] Strong security in user's accounts and paswords..

2008-02-04 Thread Mark Van Bogart
I'm running RHEL 4.6 and am using the features you are looking to implement. PAM is the direction to look. I have included my /etc/pam.d/system-auth file as example: #%PAM-1.0 # This file is auto-generated. # User changes will be destroyed the next time authconfig is run. authrequired

Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-04 Thread Warren Young
Jimmy Bradley wrote: would I really gain anything right now by going to a 64bit machine? Not unless you put at least 4 GB of RAM in it, and from your description of what you do, you have no good reason to do that. If you don't have enough RAM to need 64-bit addressing, you're just slowing

RE: [CentOS] Connect to local console from SSH session

2008-02-04 Thread Joseph L. Casale
cat /dev/vcs1 Marcelo, No way to actually interact though, without using 'screen' as mentioned beforehand if for instance I needed to answer a question? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

RE: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 at 11:56am, Ross S. W. Walker wrote You can't use an MBR partition table on a volume that large there is a max 2TB disk size limit and 2TB partition size limit for MBR, so you must use GPT. For completeness' sake, MBR=master boot

Re: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 at 11:33am, Rob Lines wrote I have just finished creating an array on our new enclosure and our CentOS 5 server has recognized it. It shows as the full 6tb in the LSI configuration utility as well as when I ran fdisk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# parted /dev/sdb Warning:

RE: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
I would seriously start thinking about using LVM on such a large storage unit. You can't use an MBR partition table on a volume that large there is a max 2TB disk size limit and 2TB partition size limit for MBR, so you must use GPT. There is a real lack of reliable and easy GPT tools under

[CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Rob Lines
I have just finished creating an array on our new enclosure and our CentOS 5 server has recognized it. It shows as the full 6tb in the LSI configuration utility as well as when I ran fdisk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# fdisk /dev/sdb Note: sector size is 2048 (not 512) The number of cylinders for

[CentOS] Overclocking core 2 duo on centos 5

2008-02-04 Thread Ern jura
Anyone out there ever overclocked core 2 duo on centos 5 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] IPTables GUIs

2008-02-04 Thread Miskell, Craig
Miskell, Craig wrote: Hi, This is semi-OT, but is Centos-related. I'm looking for an IPTables GUI to help us with our expanding network configuration. I know there's plenty out there, but most of them seem to manage the firewall on the computer on which they run, or

RE: [CentOS] Connect to local console from SSH session

2008-02-04 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Mon, February 4, 2008 1:16 pm, Joseph L. Casale wrote: By 'console' do you mean a text-mode console or the GUI desktop running a local session? There are ways to connect to the latter remotely via vnc. Sorry, I mean the text based console. I am familiar with the VNC method. jlc You might

RE: [CentOS] Connect to local console from SSH session

2008-02-04 Thread Joseph L. Casale
By 'console' do you mean a text-mode console or the GUI desktop running a local session? There are ways to connect to the latter remotely via vnc. Sorry, I mean the text based console. I am familiar with the VNC method. jlc ___ CentOS mailing list

[CentOS] RE: Strong security in user's accounts and paswords..[SOLVE]

2008-02-04 Thread israel.garcia
Hi Mark and thanks for your soon answer.. I found this excellent guide on internet http://www.puschitz.com/SecuringLinux.shtml... here I could fine all I was looking for about securing my database server running on CentOS.. Regards Israel, I'm running RHEL 4.6 and am using the features you

Re: [CentOS] IPTables GUIs

2008-02-04 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Miskell, Craig wrote: Hi, This is semi-OT, but is Centos-related. I'm looking for an IPTables GUI to help us with our expanding network configuration. I know there's plenty out there, but most of them seem to manage the firewall on the computer on which they run, or only handle

[CentOS] kickstart post install show in a window

2008-02-04 Thread Jerry Geis
Is there a way to get all the commands in the post install section from kickstart to show in a window on the X window screenas they are being executed? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-04 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Monday 04 February 2008, Warren Young wrote: Jimmy Bradley wrote: would I really gain anything right now by going to a 64bit machine? First, I'm not really disagreening with you, many users probably wouldn't see any advantages with x86_64. But you facts were a bit off... Not unless you

RE: [CentOS] IPTables GUIs

2008-02-04 Thread Mike Kercher
Hi, This is semi-OT, but is Centos-related. I'm looking for an IPTables GUI to help us with our expanding network configuration. I know there's plenty out there, but most of them seem to manage the firewall on the computer on which they run, or only handle one firewall at

Re: [CentOS] Overclocking core 2 duo on centos 5

2008-02-04 Thread Michael Simpson
On 2/4/08, Ern jura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone out there ever overclocked core 2 duo on centos 5 Have to ask why you would want to do that? CentOS is an enterprise OS designed to give as stable a platform as possible so overclocking your processor is kinda going against the aim of using

Re: [CentOS] kickstart post install show in a window

2008-02-04 Thread Gary Richardson
The output is on one of the virtual terminals. If you do a text mode install, or hit alt-f1 and search around for the right console, you'll find it. One possible trick would be to run everything in a subshell (see

RE: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 at 11:56am, Ross S. W. Walker wrote You can't use an MBR partition table on a volume that large there is a max 2TB disk size limit and 2TB partition size limit for MBR, so you must use GPT. For completeness' sake, MBR=master boot record, not a partition table. The

Re: [CentOS] One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.

2008-02-04 Thread Bill Campbell
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, John Horne wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 13:11 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2008, Brian Mathis wrote: ... Log parsing scripts often don't provide the immediacy that rate limiting does when under attack. You'd have to run the script constantly parsing

Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 06:01:11 -0700 Warren Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you don't have enough RAM to need 64-bit addressing, you're just slowing the system down, making it deal with larger addresses for no benefit. While my Centos machines are all running 32-bit at the moment, I have

RE: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
Rob Lines wrote: On Feb 4, 2008 3:16 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with LVM, you could join several smaller logical drives, maybe 1TB each, into a single volume set, which could then contain various file systems. That looks like it may be the result.

Re: [CentOS] Update problem

2008-02-04 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Feb 4, 2008 12:27 PM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was doing updates on a server and I think that the network connection got reset. So I guess the yum update didn't complete and I now get this when I run 'yum update': Looks like your problem is similar to the

Re: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Rob Lines
On Feb 4, 2008 3:34 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rob Lines wrote: On Feb 4, 2008 3:16 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with LVM, you could join several smaller logical drives, maybe 1TB each, into a single volume set, which could then contain

Re: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Rob Lines
On Feb 4, 2008 3:16 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with LVM, you could join several smaller logical drives, maybe 1TB each, into a single volume set, which could then contain various file systems. That looks like it may be the result. The main reason was to keep the amount of

[CentOS] Update problem

2008-02-04 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Hi, I was doing updates on a server and I think that the network connection got reset. So I guess the yum update didn't complete and I now get this when I run 'yum update': === Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local

Re: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread John R Pierce
Rob Lines wrote: This would appear to be your problem. Unless you have strong reasons to use 2K sectors, I'd change them to the much more standard 512. After that, parted should have no issues whatsoever. In looking back through the configuration. The 2kb sectors were set

Re: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Rob Lines
This would appear to be your problem. Unless you have strong reasons to use 2K sectors, I'd change them to the much more standard 512. After that, parted should have no issues whatsoever. In looking back through the configuration. The 2kb sectors were set in the Array in the Variable

Re: [CentOS] Install on two discs with Software Raid and LVM

2008-02-04 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
That's old information, kernel swapper can handle all types of dev mapper setups these days (well all types on fixed media). -Ross - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'CentOS mailing list' centos@centos.org Sent: Mon Feb 04 17:43:50 2008 Subject: RE:

RE: [CentOS] Install on two discs with Software Raid and LVM

2008-02-04 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Create a swap lv in the vg you created out of /dev/md1, assuming /dev/md0 is /boot. -Ross Oh, I thought it wasn’t good to run swap inside software raid? If I was wrong, I assume this is beneficial since if one of the HD’s tanks while its running, it will survive the failure and not need to

[CentOS] Re: tail command

2008-02-04 Thread Scott Silva
on 2/4/2008 2:23 PM Bill Campbell spake the following: On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, Scott McClanahan wrote: On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 14:09 -0800, Scott Silva wrote: on 2/4/2008 1:56 PM Scott McClanahan spake the following: In centos 4 we used tail in the following way: tail +83 file That would tail

[CentOS] Install on two discs with Software Raid and LVM

2008-02-04 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I am mirroring two drives during install, what's the best practice here for the swap partition? Maybe two separate lv's from independent vg's *not* mirrored for swap and the let the OS manage it? Boot and the / vg will be mirrored. Thanks! jlc ___

[CentOS] Re: tail command

2008-02-04 Thread Scott Silva
on 2/4/2008 1:56 PM Scott McClanahan spake the following: In centos 4 we used tail in the following way: tail +83 file That would tail the contents of the file starting at line 83. In centos 5 that same command complains about the file +83 not being found. It appears that the + option in

Re: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Rob Lines
On Feb 4, 2008 4:49 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:To move an external array to a new server is as easy as plugging it in and importing the volume group (vgimport). Typically I name my OS volume groups CentOS and give semi-descriptive names to my external array volume groups,

Re: [CentOS] Re: tail command

2008-02-04 Thread Scott McClanahan
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 14:09 -0800, Scott Silva wrote: on 2/4/2008 1:56 PM Scott McClanahan spake the following: In centos 4 we used tail in the following way: tail +83 file That would tail the contents of the file starting at line 83. In centos 5 that same command complains about

Re: [CentOS] Re: tail command

2008-02-04 Thread Bill Campbell
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, Scott McClanahan wrote: On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 14:09 -0800, Scott Silva wrote: on 2/4/2008 1:56 PM Scott McClanahan spake the following: In centos 4 we used tail in the following way: tail +83 file That would tail the contents of the file starting at line 83. In

[CentOS] tail command

2008-02-04 Thread Scott McClanahan
In centos 4 we used tail in the following way: tail +83 file That would tail the contents of the file starting at line 83. In centos 5 that same command complains about the file +83 not being found. It appears that the + option in tail doesn't work the same way in centos 5. Is there another

RE: [CentOS] Install on two discs with Software Raid and LVM

2008-02-04 Thread Joseph L. Casale
That's old information, kernel swapper can handle all types of dev mapper setups these days (well all types on fixed media). Ross and Les, Thank you! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] Large RAID volume issues

2008-02-04 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
Rob Lines wrote: On Feb 4, 2008 3:34 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rob Lines wrote: On Feb 4, 2008 3:16 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with LVM, you could join several smaller logical drives, maybe 1TB each,

Re: [CentOS] Install on two discs with Software Raid and LVM

2008-02-04 Thread nate
Joseph L. Casale wrote: I am mirroring two drives during install, what's the best practice here for the swap partition? Maybe two separate lv's from independent vg's *not* mirrored for swap and the let the OS manage it? Boot and the / vg will be mirrored. More of a comment than a answer but I

Re: [CentOS] Install on two discs with Software Raid and LVM

2008-02-04 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
Create a swap lv in the vg you created out of /dev/md1, assuming /dev/md0 is /boot. -Ross - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'centos@centos.org' centos@centos.org Sent: Mon Feb 04 17:29:45 2008 Subject: [CentOS] Install on two discs with Software Raid

Re: [CentOS] Install on two discs with Software Raid and LVM

2008-02-04 Thread Les Mikesell
Joseph L. Casale wrote: I am mirroring two drives during install, what's the best practice here for the swap partition? Maybe two separate lv's from independent vg's *not* mirrored for swap and the let the OS manage it? Boot and the / vg will be mirrored. If you would like to keep running

[CentOS] Re: Install on two discs with Software Raid and LVM

2008-02-04 Thread Scott Silva
on 2/4/2008 2:43 PM Joseph L. Casale spake the following: Create a swap lv in the vg you created out of /dev/md1, assuming /dev/md0 is /boot. -Ross Oh, I thought it wasn’t good to run swap inside software raid? If I was wrong, I assume this is beneficial since if one of the HD’s tanks while

Re: [CentOS] Re: tail command

2008-02-04 Thread MHR
On Feb 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 2/4/2008 2:23 PM Bill Campbell spake the following: On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, Scott McClanahan wrote: The default syntax for tail for the last 20 years or so would be ``tail -83 filename''. That would be for the LAST 83

Re: [CentOS] Connect to local console from SSH session

2008-02-04 Thread Les Mikesell
Joseph L. Casale wrote: cat /dev/vcs1 Marcelo, No way to actually interact though, without using 'screen' as mentioned beforehand if for instance I needed to answer a question? By 'console' do you mean a text-mode console or the GUI desktop running a local session? There are ways to

[CentOS] Cluster fun

2008-02-04 Thread Scott Ehrlich
I've priced some 1 and 2U Dell servers. Now, I'd like to perform a price comparison of COTS hardware for 1 and 2U servers. What VAR companies do people recommend I check out for putting machines together? I'm perfectly capable of installing and swapping hardware components when/where

Re: [CentOS] Cluster fun

2008-02-04 Thread nate
Scott Ehrlich wrote: I've priced some 1 and 2U Dell servers. Now, I'd like to perform a price comparison of COTS hardware for 1 and 2U servers. What VAR companies do people recommend I check out for putting machines together? I'm perfectly capable of installing and swapping hardware

Re: [CentOS] Re: tail command

2008-02-04 Thread Alex White
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:58:27 -0800 MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: On Feb 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 2/4/2008 2:23 PM Bill Campbell spake the following: On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, Scott McClanahan wrote: The default syntax for tail

[CentOS] adapting perl check_snmp_load script for CentOS environment

2008-02-04 Thread Rogelio
I'm trying to use some perl scripts on a CentOS box (Nagios03) that were previously working on a Gentoo (Nagios01) box. Any ideas on what I might to do try to resolve this? WORKS ON GENTOO nagios01 new # ./check_snmp_load.pl -H myserver.mydomain.comhttp://ha-vpn-internal.clacorp.com -C

[CentOS] Need help in analyzing ntop data

2008-02-04 Thread ankush grover
Hi, I want to do some analysis of NTOP data. Currently I have installed NTOP on Centos 5.1 and I am able to see some network data being graphed. But there is no documentation given whether NTOP is showing Network Throughput in MBytes or MBits for ex I am getting Throughput Min: 163.7k , Max:

Re: [CentOS] adapting perl check_snmp_load script for CentOS environment

2008-02-04 Thread John R Pierce
Rogelio wrote: I'm trying to use some perl scripts on a CentOS box (Nagios03) that were previously working on a Gentoo (Nagios01) box. Any ideas on what I might to do try to resolve this? WORKS ON GENTOO nagios01 new # ./check_snmp_load.pl -H myserver.mydomain.com

[CentOS] system gets suspended automatically!

2008-02-04 Thread Chandra
Hello! I am running CentOS-5 with latest kernel available by deault (2.6.23). I installed it on a Dell XPS machine having Intel Quad processors (4 parallel cpus). I use it to run a computational program and I need to keep the program running for 1-2 months continuously. I generally boot it in