luisito wrote:
es obligatorio usar sendmail por eso necesito ayuda!!!
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-esC
Hola amigos:
Tengo instalado centos 5 y ya lo baje todas las actualizaciones.
Estoy instalando bind-9.3.3-10.el5, creo el archivo named.conf, el de mi zona y
el de resolucion inversa, loevanto el servicio sin problema, pero al hacer
hacer:
host proxy
Host proxy not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
host
Alguien sabe que sucede con el servidor de lista SPAM ORDB-RBL.ORG que
actualmente esta bloquiando cualquier cosa lo que es SPAM y lo que no ¿?¿?¿?
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Saludos a todos...
Tengo instalado en un Centos 5.1 Firebird 1.5.5 nptl, la maquina es un
IBM System x3650 con procesador Quad-Core Intel Xeon X5355 a 2.66 GHz, el
problema ocurre cuando tengo una gran carga de usuario, firebird (1.5.5)
me indica
que esta trabajando al 100% pero si veo la
Henry Villavicencio wrote:
Hola amigos:
Tengo instalado centos 5 y ya lo baje todas las actualizaciones.
Estoy instalando bind-9.3.3-10.el5, creo el archivo named.conf, el de mi zona y
el de resolucion inversa, loevanto el servicio sin problema, pero al hacer
hacer:
host proxy
Host proxy
Juan Morales Diaz wrote:
Estoy instalando unos paquetes en centos 51, pero al realizar la
sigueinte operacion me da el siguiente error:
rpmbuild -tb courier-imap-4.3.1.tar.bz2
El me pide que instale algunas dependencias, ya las instale.
Pero despues al volver a ejecutar:
rpmbuild -tb
Carlos Mario Guerra Téllez wrote:
Alguien sabe que sucede con el servidor de lista SPAM ORDB-RBL.ORG que
actualmente esta bloquiando cualquier cosa lo que es SPAM y lo que no
¿?¿?¿?
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
Carlos Mario Guerra Téllez wrote:
Alguien sabe que sucede con el servidor de lista SPAM ORDB-RBL.ORG que
actualmente esta bloquiando cualquier cosa lo que es SPAM y lo que no
¿?¿?¿?
sacalo de tu server por que no va mas
Correcto, eso fue lo que hice, gracias
--
Este mensaje ha sido
We have a public server and we did the following for SSH:
* Only Protocol v2
* Only key authentication, no password and large keys (just for the fun).
* Disable root login.
* Monitoring, we usually blacklists IPs trying to log in with many
unsuccessful attempts, using some custom scripts and
Hello,
I have a machine that seemed to reboot by itself yesterday, in
/var/log/messages I only see:
Mar 25 14:26:45 asterisk shutdown[19256]: shutting down for system reboot
When I type: last reboot
I see:
reboot system boot 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 Tue Mar 25 14:28 (18:41)
So it seems
Andrew Hearn wrote:
Hello,
I have a machine that seemed to reboot by itself yesterday, in
/var/log/messages I only see:
Mar 25 14:26:45 asterisk shutdown[19256]: shutting down for system reboot
What do you mean by only see?
Are there no lines before this in /var/log/messages?
Maybe in
On Monday 24 March 2008 18:59:59 Les Mikesell wrote:
Sam Drinkard wrote:
One is from the kbs repo, and one is from rpmforge. Mostly, you're
mixing similar packages from different repositories. This is a bad
thing, and the reason for the existence of priorities, and
protectbase plugins,
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Andrew Hearn wrote:
Hello,
I have a machine that seemed to reboot by itself yesterday, in
/var/log/messages I only see:
Mar 25 14:26:45 asterisk shutdown[19256]: shutting down for system reboot
What do you mean by only see?
Are there no lines before this in
3. Install some brute force protection which can automatically ban an IP
on say 5 / 10 failed login attempts
The only software I know that could do this isn't supported anymore
(trisentry) or is too confusing and I don't know it yet (snort).
Suggestions?
denyhosts is pretty
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:31 +, Andrew Hearn wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Andrew Hearn wrote:
Hello,
I have a machine that seemed to reboot by itself yesterday, in
/var/log/messages I only see:
Mar 25 14:26:45 asterisk shutdown[19256]: shutting down for system reboot
What do
This looks like a normal shutdown command was issued from somewhere,
IMO. I would check the other log files under /var/log and its sub-
directories for entries around this time. Especially secure.log*. Also,
I don't know your configuration, but is there a cron or at entry that
has a scheduled
William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:18:51 -0400:
~ ? Got me on that one.
home dir plus prompt. It looks funny, yes :-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
Craig White wrote on Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:26:04 -0700:
rpm -e --justdb some_package
I had hoped for a solution that automagically removes those 50 packages.
Thanks, anyway, I'll dig up all the packages from the yum log and try it.
rpm --help
It's easy to overlook functionality in that long
Robert Spangler wrote on Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:33:02 -0400:
Is an option but a waste of time as a scanner will find the port it was moved
to.
It's not a waste. Port scanning takes time, so, in general, those brute-force
bots just try port 22. Only if someone really wants to hack you and
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 07:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
The idea of only allowing for strict ip address is good but what if you
are on the move?
If you have a static IP address, this is not a problem. You VPN into your
home LAN and from there to the restricted machine.
If you are going
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I am looking online trying to find a procedure to automount a CIFS
share but need to use username/domain/pass in the credential file
thats referenced in fstab. Its not working, anyone know of a resource
that works in CentOS5.1?
If it matters, the unc has a dash and a $
Check if you allow write access to snmp and from whom. A reboot request could
have been issued via snmp.
-Ross
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Wed Mar 26 07:09:06 2008
Subject: Re: [CentOS] System Rebooted
Check if you allow write access to snmp and from whom. A reboot
request could have been issued via snmp.
it could but you'd need something to map the OID being hit to either a
script or the reboot command
___
CentOS mailing list
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 08:20 -0400, Rick Barnes wrote:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I am looking online trying to find a procedure to automount a CIFS
share but need to use username/domain/pass in the credential file
thats referenced in fstab. Its not working, anyone know of a resource
that
This works for me using a credentials file:
username=DOMAIN\hostname
password=password
I know the $ doesn't make a difference because I mount my AD homedir
that has a $ at the end, I don't think the dash would make a difference
but I'm not a 100% positive.
Rick
I later found that and it is
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:31:16 +0100:
I'll dig up all the packages from the yum log and try it.
That still fails for a few packages because of the order I got from the
log. I was able to erase all of them from the rpm db now. But the whole
thing very much looks like a bug, or
Robert Spangler wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:03:48 -0400:
If you are going to use VPN then why not setup your remote site to use VPN
and
bypass SSH altogether then?
There could be several reasons, for instance:
1. SSH is all what is necessary
2. it's probably easier to have *one* VPN and
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:03:48 -0400:
If you are going to use VPN then why not setup your remote site to
use VPN and bypass SSH altogether then?
There could be several reasons, for instance:
1. SSH is all what is necessary
2. it's probably easier
Bowie Bailey wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:18:56 -0500:
Use VPN to connect to your network and then ssh through the VPN tunnel
to any machines you need to work with. This way only the VPN is exposed
to the Internet.
if the machines are within the LAN, yes. My original point was that if you
if the machines are within the LAN, yes. My original point was that if you
have a static IP address for your local LAN *and* you want to restrict the
*remote* machines to be ssh-connectable only from that LAN (which is a
good security measure) *and* you are on the road you can still work on
Hi all,
I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install.
The goal here is to have unix/linux usernames/passwords used for the
samba shares (which i'll setup using webmin, as I find it easy that
way). At present, the home share and one for the company's public share
are in place.
I can
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:18:56 -0500:
Use VPN to connect to your network and then ssh through the VPN
tunnel to any machines you need to work with. This way only the
VPN is exposed to the Internet.
if the machines are within the LAN, yes. My
Ray Leventhal wrote:
Hi all,
I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install.
The goal here is to have unix/linux usernames/passwords used for the
samba shares (which i'll setup using webmin, as I find it easy that
way). At present, the home share and one for the company's public
share
John R Pierce wrote:
Ray Leventhal wrote:
Hi all,
I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install.
The goal here is to have unix/linux usernames/passwords used for the
samba shares (which i'll setup using webmin, as I find it easy that
way). At present, the home share and one for the
on 3-26-2008 6:55 AM Ray Leventhal spake the following:
Hi all,
I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install.
The goal here is to have unix/linux usernames/passwords used for the
samba shares (which i'll setup using webmin, as I find it easy that
way). At present, the home share and
I would like to use the above config, i think.
Can cyrus-imap work nicely with Maildir ? If so is there one available
thats configured with msql support?
In the past i have used courier-imap but ideally i want to use sieve
thanks
___
CentOS
on an ASUS P5K-E wifi (wifi disabled in bios) board with:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E
Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12)
centos 5.1 did not configure the device.
Anyone else see this or have a solution?
Tried forcing sky2 module, but init just
Tim Alberts wrote:
So I setup ssh on a server so I could do some work from home and I
think the second I opened it every sorry monkey from around the world
has been trying every account name imaginable to get into the system.
What's a good way to deal with this?
SSH question. Can I setup a
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:16 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-26-2008 6:55 AM Ray Leventhal spake the following:
Hi all,
I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install.
The goal here is to have unix/linux usernames/passwords used for the
samba shares (which i'll setup using
We have CENTOS version 3,4 and 5 on DELL servers. What I want to know is how
to setup SFTP log file similiar to vsftpd.log. I knew /var/log/secure provide
me login user information, but I need more detail like file name, get/put,
etc.
Thanks you for help.
Andrew Hearn wrote:
Hello,
I have a machine that seemed to reboot by itself yesterday, in
/var/log/messages I only see:
Mar 25 14:26:45 asterisk shutdown[19256]: shutting down for system reboot
When I type: last reboot
I see:
reboot system boot 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 Tue Mar 25 14:28
Scott Silva wrote:
I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install.
The goal here is to have unix/linux usernames/passwords used for the
samba shares (which i'll setup using webmin, as I find it easy that
way). At present, the home share and one for the company's public
share are in
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 13:26 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
on an ASUS P5K-E wifi (wifi disabled in bios) board with:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E
Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12)
centos 5.1 did not configure the device.
Anyone else see
Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-26-2008 6:55 AM Ray Leventhal spake the following:
Hi all,
I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install.
The goal here is to have unix/linux usernames/passwords used for the
samba shares (which i'll setup using webmin, as I find it easy that
way). At present,
Les Mikesell wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install.
big snip
Thanks in advance,
-Ray
If you are going to use smb passwords anyway, why set security to
share?
You should set security to user and make sure you keep unix users
and samba users synced.
snip
With user level security you can't connect to different shares as
different users, so if you remove the 'public' from the home section
(as you probably should) and let people connect as themselves, they
will have to also connect as themselves to the public shares.
And now that Ive
on 3-26-2008 10:32 AM John spake the following:
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:16 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-26-2008 6:55 AM Ray Leventhal spake the following:
Hi all,
I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install.
The goal here is to have unix/linux usernames/passwords used for the
Hi,
I just setup a dedicated server on OVH, and I wonder: what's the best
way to monitor connection attempts? Like: folks trying to connect on
various ports?
Cheers,
Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Scott Silva wrote:
Not to complain about hijacking threads (which is very irritating), but
I think the link you have referenced is more a problem with the CIFS
protocol and not samba security. Samba share mode is more for shares
that you want everybody to have access to. Home directories,
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 18:23:32 Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-26-2008 10:32 AM John spake the following:
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:16 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-26-2008 6:55 AM Ray Leventhal spake the following:
Hi all,
I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install.
The goal
Ray Leventhal wrote:
With user level security you can't connect to different shares as
different users, so if you remove the 'public' from the home section
(as you probably should) and let people connect as themselves, they
will have to also connect as themselves to the public shares.
John wrote:
snip
If you are trying to add it use the system-config-network. I run
basically the same mother board on my home PC and it does work. (the
driver) GUI - System | Administration | Network | Hardware Tab | New.
yeahtried that till blue in the face. The device is just not being
No. cyrus has its own mail store format. Which is similar to maildir,
but ...
cyrus can authenticate against everything which can be authenticated
against via pam (I use ldap), so mysql shouldn't be an issue, if there
are pam modules to do that. That all works via saslauthd.
ok thanks -
Anne Wilson wrote:
Like John, I fought long and hard to get user share working. I read
Eeverything I could, including buying Samba3 by Example. In the end I
admitted defeat and went back to shares.
If you really want a public share with no authentication at all, share
mode is probably
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. cyrus has its own mail store format. Which is similar to maildir,
but ...
cyrus can authenticate against everything which can be authenticated
against via pam (I use ldap), so mysql shouldn't be an issue, if
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ray Leventhal wrote:
Normally you have to add the users yourself with their passwords since
the encryption is different than the linux passwd file uses and it can
only be done when you still have the plaintext.
smbpasswd -a login_name
But didn't you say you used
Like John, I fought long and hard to get user share working. I read
Eeverything I could, including buying Samba3 by Example. In the end I
admitted defeat and went back to shares.
Anne
As the powers that be are
on 3-26-2008 11:31 AM Ray Leventhal spake the following:
yet more from my samba saga. Making the change from security=share to
security=user has resulted in my aforementioned login prompt box from
Windows.
I noted, while doing a 'service smb restart', that this turns up in
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 18:59:41 Les Mikesell wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
Like John, I fought long and hard to get user share working. I read
Eeverything I could, including buying Samba3 by Example. In the end I
admitted defeat and went back to shares.
If you really want a public share
Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-26-2008 11:31 AM Ray Leventhal spake the following:
yet more from my samba saga. Making the change from security=share
to security=user has resulted in my aforementioned login prompt box
from Windows.
I noted, while doing a 'service smb restart', that this turns up
Anne Wilson wrote:
This is becoming a real hijack, which I didn't intend. However,
All users that are intended to be able to share have a user account on the
samba server. All users have samba passwords matching their login passwords,
whether in windows or linux. I couldn't even get
on 3-26-2008 11:55 AM Clyde E. Kunkel spake the following:
John wrote:
snip
If you are trying to add it use the system-config-network. I run
basically the same mother board on my home PC and it does work. (the
driver) GUI - System | Administration | Network | Hardware Tab | New.
I do some occasional tech work for a cable TV/Internet service provider. They
have now offered me free services, including cable Internet. I currently have a
DSL service through the telephone company and, for several reasons including the
fact that it is really unlimited service with no cap and
Tom Brown wrote:
No. cyrus has its own mail store format. Which is similar to maildir,
but ...
cyrus can authenticate against everything which can be authenticated
against via pam (I use ldap), so mysql shouldn't be an issue, if there
are pam modules to do that. That all works via
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 19:20:22 Ray Leventhal wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
This is becoming a real hijack, which I didn't intend. However,
All users that are intended to be able to share have a user account on
the samba server. All users have samba passwords matching their login
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
This is becoming a real hijack, which I didn't intend. However,
All users that are intended to be able to share have a user account on the
samba server. All users have samba passwords
I just migrated my working Fedora Core 8 desktop to CentOS 5.1 and went from my
nice 1680x1050 resolution to 1280x1024. I have made all the possible xorg.conf
changes I found on the net to no avail. I tried system-config-display –reconfig
and it allows me to pick the resolution but reverts back
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 18:59:41 Les Mikesell wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
Like John, I fought long and hard to get user share working. I read
Eeverything I could, including buying Samba3 by Example. In the end I
admitted defeat and went back to shares.
If you really want
On your Windows box, set up a user and password that match *exactly*
what was entered for *samba* user/password. I can browse and connect
to samba servers with security = user .
Akemi
Hi Akemi,
I've done that with my own un/pw on my WinXP machine as well as the new
CentOS/Samba server.
Tim Alberts wrote:
So I setup ssh on a server so I could do some work from home and I
think the second I opened it every sorry monkey from around the world
has been trying every account name imaginable to get into the system.
What's a good way to deal with this?
- keep your ssh up to date.
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 19:34:18 Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
This is becoming a real hijack, which I didn't intend. However,
All users that are intended to be able to share have a user account on
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
This is becoming a real hijack, which I didn't intend. However,
All users that are intended to be able to share have a user account on the
samba server. All users have samba
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:37:09 -0600
Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know what might need to be done in CentOS for this to work?
http://www.melvilletheatre.com/articles/intel-widescreen/index.html
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
on 3-26-2008 12:15 PM Anne Wilson spake the following:
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 18:59:41 Les Mikesell wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
Like John, I fought long and hard to get user share working. I read
Everything I could, including buying Samba3 by Example. In the end I
admitted defeat and went
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:55 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
John wrote:
snip
If you are trying to add it use the system-config-network. I run
basically the same mother board on my home PC and it does work. (the
driver) GUI - System | Administration | Network | Hardware Tab | New.
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:55 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
John wrote:
snip
If you are trying to add it use the system-config-network. I run
basically the same mother board on my home PC and it does work. (the
driver) GUI - System | Administration | Network | Hardware Tab | New.
on 3-26-2008 12:11 PM Ray Leventhal spake the following:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ray Leventhal wrote:
Normally you have to add the users yourself with their passwords since
the encryption is different than the linux passwd file uses and it can
only be done when you still have the plaintext.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On your Windows box, set up a user and password that match *exactly*
what was entered for *samba* user/password. I can browse and connect
to samba servers with security = user .
Akemi
Hi Akemi,
I've
Greg Bailey wrote:
Is there any chance someone could have hit the ctrl-alt-delete key
combination on the console to trigger the reboot? I've had people do
that inadvertently thinking they were on a Windows machine...
After rebooting servers 3 or 4 times that way myself, I now disable this
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On your Windows box, set up a user and password that match *exactly*
what was entered for *samba* user/password. I can browse and connect
to samba servers with security = user .
But you probably don't have any
on 3-26-2008 12:27 PM Frank Cox spake the following:
I do some occasional tech work for a cable TV/Internet service provider. They
have now offered me free services, including cable Internet. I currently have a
DSL service through the telephone company and, for several reasons including the
It is possible, because I am doing it. I have share=user and have home
directories viewable by the user and the admin (me). I have various
departmental shares that each department can access and no one else
(but the admin -- again me). Even shares that aren't browsable, so no
one even
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 13:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
I do some occasional tech work for a cable TV/Internet service provider. They
have now offered me free services, including cable Internet. I currently
have a
DSL service through the telephone company and, for several reasons including
Then try this: Open Windows Explorer - Tools - Map Network Drive -
Connect using a different user name.
This will prompt you to enter both username and password. If you
still cannot connect this way, the problem is somewhere else.
Akemi
Hi Akemi,
I tried your suggestion with the same
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:42 -0400, Ray Leventhal wrote:
On your Windows box, set up a user and password that match *exactly*
what was entered for *samba* user/password. I can browse and connect
to samba servers with security = user .
Akemi
Hi Akemi,
I've done that with my own
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:47 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-26-2008 12:15 PM Anne Wilson spake the following:
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 18:59:41 Les Mikesell wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
Like John, I fought long and hard to get user share working. I read
Everything I could, including buying
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Anne Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On your Windows box, set up a user and password that match *exactly*
what was entered for *samba* user/password. I can browse and connect
to samba servers with security = user .
Akemi, they have always been
DO the user credentials on the windows boxes match the credentials on
the samba box?
Did you turn off simple filesharing on the XP machines?
in an effort to prove that at least my creds match, I dropped from root
to my regular user status in shell and did
smbpasswd
this is what happened:
Hi John,
Ok, Ray and Anne Post me your Samba Version rpm -q samba. Akemi has
helped me with my samba problems but I can't get nowhere when I put
mode=user. Believe this or not I have never had this kind of problem
with samba. I want to be able to authenticate by the logged on client
machine, so
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 13:08 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
Also, an entire transaction will go over only one of the lines,
meaning you will only get the throughput of one line at a time.
I forgot to mention that independent applications (therefor many
independent connections) won't use just
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:08:58 -0700
Timothy Selivanow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only way that you would be able to use them is a semi-load-balancing
formation. What I mean by semi is that all traffic that exits one
interface will always return to that one. Also, an entire transaction
will
Ray Leventhal wrote:
DO the user credentials on the windows boxes match the credentials on
the samba box?
Did you turn off simple filesharing on the XP machines?
in an effort to prove that at least my creds match, I dropped from
root to my regular user status in shell and did
smbpasswd
on 3-26-2008 1:01 PM Ray Leventhal spake the following:
It is possible, because I am doing it. I have share=user and have home
directories viewable by the user and the admin (me). I have various
departmental shares that each department can access and no one else
(but the admin -- again
Anyone know what might need to be done in CentOS for this to work?
http://www.melvilletheatre.com/articles/intel-widescreen/index.html
Frank,
I installed 915resolution but when executing it, it says Intel Chipset
detected but cant determine type...
Any ideas?
Thanks!
jlc
Ray Leventhal wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:11:26 -0400:
Any idea why I can't seem to browse in anything other than 'share' mode?
The user mode keeps popping up an authentication box for which there
seems not to be a correct answer...meaning I re-auth, but I keep getting
the box, with
Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:08:58 -0700
Timothy Selivanow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only way that you would be able to use them is a semi-load-balancing
formation. What I mean by semi is that all traffic that exits one
interface will always return to that one. Also, an
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 13:13 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Anne Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On your Windows box, set up a user and password that match *exactly*
what was entered for *samba* user/password. I can browse and connect
to samba servers
Tom Brown wrote:
I would like to use the above config, i think.
Can cyrus-imap work nicely with Maildir ? If so is there one available
thats configured with msql support?
In the past i have used courier-imap but ideally i want to use sieve
if it's just for sieve, you can use dovecot. it's
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:31:06 -0600
Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed 915resolution but when executing it, it says Intel Chipset
detected but cant determine type...
Any ideas?
The latest version of 915resolution is apparently 0.5.3, available here:
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:35 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
If you had 2 Internet firewalls each with their own default route, each
doing NAT. On each of these firewalls you had a squid process running
proxying requests and chaining requests from one squid to the other
depending either on,
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
